User talk:Athaenara/Archive 8

This is an archive of discussions from 2010.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, do so on the current talk page.

← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 →

Conflict of interest discussions in 2010

Stratford Career Institute

As a representative of Stratford Career Institute, we feel our page has been unfairly deleted. The purpose in listing our school on your site was to allow users to get the most accurate information about our school. We consider our Wikipedia listing to be informative in nature and not for promotional purposes.

Stratford Career Institute is a legitimate distance learning schools that was founded in 1991 and has enrolled more than one million students worldwide in that time.

There are a number of similar career institutes/distance learning schools listed on Wikipedia (Penn Foster, Ashworth, US Career Institute, Blackstone) and more. All of these schools' cover the same information in a similar manner to the Stratford Career Institute page.

We certainly welcome any suggestions for improvement of our listing and are happy to modify content etc, but do request that we are able to relist our school. We feel we are eligible to have an online presence on Wikipedia and that our listing is valuable to users.

We are respectfully requesting that our listing be reinstated.

Thank you for your consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stratfordcareer (talk • contribs) 16:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There may be a misunderstanding here about what Wikipedia is. It is an encyclopedia, not a free web host. Article content must be neutral, supported by references and citations of independent reliable sources.

Three versions of that article have been deleted by three different administrators, the first version as an attack page, the second as astroturfing, and the third as unambiguous advertising. You may appeal the deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review, but did you read and understand the {{uw-coi}} information which was posted on your user talk page? — Athaenara ✉ 20:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI template

→ see also: template page history

Please notice that Template:Uw-coi has been updated. Today you put an old version on User talk:Podurai and User talk:Artrg. The best way to use this template is {{subst:Uw-coi}} Debresser (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used to subst the template but found it increasingly aggravating to have to re-edit the text for additional articles or username cautions, so I edited my own version of the text (embedded here for convenience). Thank you for prompting me to check its current form and update the Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices part. — Athaenara ✉ 20:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Happy editing! Debresser (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taxsimple

Deleted article recreated

Hi there. Just want to inform you that the article which you deleted a few minutes ago has been recreated by the same editor. Amsaim (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. You've been alert to the problem, so it's probably not news to you that I blocked the Ryantaxsimple account and deleted the spam again. — Athaenara ✉ 18:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trozzolo Communications Group

I'm trying to get a page put back up or have the opportunity to rewrite it. Is that allowed? 70.245.115.121 (talk) 03:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to rewrite the contents of the page. Am I allowed to do that if it is a deleted page? Moraqjo (talk) 03:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read and understand the {{uw-coi}} I posted on your talk page last month? – Athaenara ✉ 06:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Human trafficking in the Philippines

→ see also: page history

How to explain references

Hello, I wanted to ask a question in regards to an article on Human Trafficking Im involved in. The article has often been the subject of edits over the years where users have continuely tried to remove all mentions of child prostitution and foreign pedophelia from the article. The excuse for this has always been along the lines of NPOV. This is despite the fact the article has some close to 200 references, and every sentence of that article has one or more references. Now, I could very easily add 10 references to every sentence in the article, but doing this would make the article appear very messy. The thing is that many of the references cite the same ongoing trend, etc. Now, Im wondering, without me having to clutter the article with thousands of references, is there a way or banner, etc that explains all the references collectively also represent most of the sentences? Meaning that although say a certain sentence may have only one or two references tagged on its end, one must take note of all the references which also support each sentence. Do you understand what Im trying to say. Hope Ive expressed what Im trying to ask here, thankyou Susanbryce (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the article and noticed at least one area where the format could be improved for a reference which was used more than once. For example, the identical "Prosecutions" section citations which are currently numbered 145, 146, and 147 could have the <ref name="name"> source </ref> format in the first instance and the <ref name="name"/> format in subsequent ones.

The Signpost had an interesting reference system updated item last September about using list-defined references to have all long-form citations in the {{reflist}} itself and short-form in-line citations in the text. I've used it in a few articles (e.g. here and here) and think it's an improvement but the prospect of converting a long pre-existing article with many citations can be daunting.

If some sources support most of the text, one method is to have those sources listed in a references section while in-line citations are displayed in a footnotes section (Wikipedia:Footnotes#Style recommendations refers to Wikipedia:Citing sources#Shortened footnotes for this).

Unfortunately, I'm not sure I fully understand how to implement what you have in mind. Help talk:Footnotes or Wikipedia talk:Citing sources might be good places to ask. – Athaenara ✉ 22:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stewart Enterprises

I saw the article for Stewart enterprises while in Huggle and the article was speedy deleted before I could edit it. Despite the COI issues, the article was fairly neutral in wording and made an explicit claim of notability in being the second largest funeral services provider in the United States. While sources were not added properly, there were inline sources provided. I'd like to ask that the article be undeleted so that appropriate changes could be made to address any issues with the article. As a neutrally written article it would appear that WP:CSD#G11 does not apply. Alansohn (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that it was fairly neutral (especially the "Stewart’s funeral homes and cemeteries offer families a complete range of services and products including family consultations, burial preparation, flowers and caskets to mausoleums, lawn crypts, markers, and urn niches ..." line) but you can take it to deletion review or ask one of the admins listed here for a copy to improve. – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Netpointers

unblock request

Dear Athaenara

I'm contacting you due to a block of my account and deletion of my article.

I've been instructed to please include all relevant details in the query I'm making.

Start of block: 07:20, 20 March 2010

Expiry of block: infinite

Intended blockee: NETPOINTERS

My current IP address is 166.179.89.71 and the block ID is #1846363

NETPOINTERS → Naturesnorthvik

Current name: NETPOINTERS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
Requested name: Naturesnorthvik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
For global renamer: rename user
Reason: I'm new to Wikipedia and had no intention whatsoever of either setting up a Spamusername nor writing an article for publicity and/or promotional purposes. The article is for the interest of what's called "Cross Optimsiation", which is what a Danish company called Netpointers has developed. It has never been my intention to run the risk or being blocked for this. I sincerely hope that the block is no longer necessary because I now understand what I've been blocked for. I'll not do it again and I'll make productive contributions at all times.

FYI - I've also contacted the user "Beeblebrox" about unblocling my account. I please ask you for your understanding and I'm happy to edit any part the article, if this will be required to get listed. I'v acted in good faith and I'm not a spammer. Many thanks for your understanding. I'll look forward to hearing back from you soon. Kindest and warmest regards, Michael. 166.179.89.71 (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael. The problem here is that an "advertising agency and search engine marketing company ... offering search engine optimisation, web promotion and search engine marketing strategies" (quote from deleted article) is apparently trying to use Wikipedia for that very purpose. Wikipedia:Search engine optimization#Best Practices for SEOs and SEMs Participating in Wikipedia has some insight into that.

As for the unblock request and username change, see the instructions on User talk:NETPOINTERS in the "What can I do now?" portion of the block notice. – Athaenara ✉ 23:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Child Watch Phuket

→ in re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child Watch Phuket

Hello, Im trying to save an article from deletion. Its on Child Watch Phuket. I would appreciate your involvement in editing the article and possibly helping to find some further references. Being in Thailand makes it very difficult to find information in English. thankyou,Susanbryce (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SAGES

I just created an article for the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). It was deleted speedily for unambigous advertising by you. It's a non-profit organization which is involved in educating surgeons. I am willing to delete any sections which are considered advertising since this was not the intent, but please undelete the article. I was hoping to have other members of the organization provide more information and input this week.

Axygos (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New York Food Tours

Hi. Is there a possibility my page can be userfyed so I can edit it. I am re-reading the Business policy, as well as the Organizations FAQ. I want to work on my article to make it a valid one for Wiki. Thanks,

Superdeed 17:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, see here for that. – Athaenara ✉ 21:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get for the original draft to be uploaded in my useraccount for further editing? Thanks,

Superdeed —Preceding undated comment added 17:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

See the instructions at the top of the category page. – Athaenara ✉ 21:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A few days ago I posted an article about New York Food Tours, which was nominated for Speedy Deletion under the G11 criteria. I have edited the article and re-read the Wikipedia Business and publication policy. I believe I have edited the article so that it does not violate any of these rules. Is there a way I can get feedback from you, or should I just post the article? I am aware of the guidelines, yet I do not want this to harm my account or block the New York Food Tours company from Wikipedia. Thank you. Superdeed (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The userspace version still reads more like an enthusiastic magazine article than an encyclopedia entry, but editing for neutrality (WP:NPOV) may salvage it for a move to article space. If you have a conflict of interest, that may not be easy. WikiProject Food and drink editors might come forward to assist you if you ask on the project's talk page. Good luck. – Athaenara ✉ 21:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Schooloutlook

Shouldn't Schooloutlook (talk · contribs) be blocked for infringing the username policy? "Schooloutlook" is the name of the company advertised on the userpage and talk page. Thanks, Goodvac (talk) 07:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest WP:UFA, but you already reported it. – Athaenara ✉ 07:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found Organic

You deleted a page I created called "found Organic" on the basis of unambiguous advertising or promotion.

Can you please explain why?

The content was scripted as a generic business overview, much like Innocent drinks, Pom Wonderful, etc to name 2 of hundreds of brands that have a brief summary of their operations.

If there is changes that need to be made can you please tell me what they are, in which i will make them.

Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfound007 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The product sounds great, but the entry was tagged {{db-g11}} because it was written like a promotional press release, not a neutral encyclopedia entry. When one has a proprietary conflict of interest it's difficult to write about a subject in the objective style which is appropriate for an encyclopedia. Aside from style issues, the text must be supported by independent reliable sources (WP:RS) which demonstrate the product's notability (WP:N). You may be able to get some help with it by asking on the WikiProject Food and drink talk page. Good luck. – Athaenara ✉ 21:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tier 5(Five) Unemployment Insurance Political Activism

Hello, can you please take this article which was deleted and userfy it into my personal sandbox? I understand the mistakes in the article and am happy to correct them and ask for editorial assistance before any attempt to publish again. The article was in no way meant to be an advertisement and the content that was included from change.org/petitions was the full text of a public petition to government and it was quoted as such and only intended to reflect, in full, the complete context of the public petition to government. I will be happy to summarize the content in the petition and cite the sources. Also, the citations from blogs can be replaced with other news sources such as CNN, WorldNewsVine, and MSNBC which have reported the same content.Usunemployed (talk) 05:47, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles. There are instructions at the top of that page. – Athaenara ✉ 05:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as someone who is in that category, I would personally not resurrect it. There was no content in there that was based on any reliable sources and it was all directly promotional. It seems unlikely, but if you really, really feel the need to start an article, create a new draft in your userspace - there's nothing salvageable from that first incarnation. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contegro

Can you explain why the Contegro CMS page was deleted? We made sure there was not advertising or marketing focus to the content.

If you could userfy the content rather than deleting the page it would be much appreciated. Vaughanreed (talk) 20:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you are the founder and managing director of the company, I posted a {{uw-coi}} notice on your talk page below the previous notices. – Athaenara ✉ 21:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Athaenara, thank you for your response. Contegro is a well know CMS system in New Zealand and would be a suitable addition to the Wikipedia list of Content Management Systems. Can you help or suggest how I could go about adding Contegro as a Article so that we can get it listed within the Proprietary software - Microsoft ASP.NET section. The last article I created was factual and inline with the other listed products so I'm not sure where I went wrong. Your help would be very much appreciated Vaughanreed (talk) 08:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It will be clearer to you if you read the coi guideline and other pages linked in the informative messages posted to your talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 11:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceClaim

Hi Athaenara,

You deleted my SpaceClaim page and while I most likely understand your reasoning, I am more concerned with tracking down the content of my post which I can't seem to find anywhere. Can you possibly advise on a way I might find what I wrote somewhere on the Wikipedia site so I can use it to revise and make it more appropriate for Wikipedia.

Thanks! Ben —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsharbaugh (talk • contribs) 15:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page history shows that a dozen or more users edited it after it was created in September 2008, and it had been tagged for multiple issues, including {{advert}} and {{self-published}}, for more than a year. It was finally tagged {{db-spam}} this month.

Your position at a PR firm retained by the company does not confer page ownership (see WP:OWN). You might want to take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review, but keep in mind that your conflict of interest does cloud the issue. – Athaenara ✉ 23:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KidStart

Can you explain why my entry was deleted as there are other similar entries on Wikipedia ie quidco?

I do not work for the company but do use it and am often asked about it by other mums wanting to do the same, hence the article.

Regards

Emmamme (talk) 09:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Quidco article has been challenged (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quidco). I undeleted KidStart for now, but as it's still tagged {{db-g11}} you may wish to add a {{hangon}} tag to the article and explain your objections on the article's talk page.

If it is deleted again, try Wikipedia:Deletion review. – Athaenara ✉ 20:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Preferred Hotel Group

You deleted this article today and I am requesting that it be undeleted and moved to my user subpage in order to make improvements per ukexpat's suggestion. Any further suggestions you have to help make the article more suitable for Wikipedia would also be appreciated. Kpmtk19 (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 02:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extentia Information Technology

Please restore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extentia_Information_Technology . There's a fair amount of coverage from the past 5 years on Google News http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Extentia+Information+Technology%22&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a . The company is legitimate, is a though leader on travel domain and iPad related technology, and is well known in Pune, India for its support of social causes. They will also do a 'fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic' per your suggestion. Please help. Wikiven (talk) 07:13, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been deleted four times so far. I wouldn't restore it but you can try Wikipedia:Deletion review if you wish. – Athaenara ✉ 10:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll try the review. Wikiven (talk) 10:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Multibionta

Hi Athaenara:

I have a few question regarding the speed deletion of the Multibionta Wiki page. Firstly, I understand the points that were provided regarding the "Marketing campaigns" subheading and links. I actually agree with these items for removal as it does seem like product promotion. I really want you to know that this was not the intent. I developed this page as a result of a a digital coupon found online and numerous questions posted by interested viewers. That said, the Multibionta page's intent is to provide an unbiased look at what Multibionta exactly is, how it works, and some scientific data on multivitamin/probiotics. I recieved a notification that the page was considered an "orphan" as well as a tip to add categories. Upon following this direction, I did realize that some of the page's content should be revised (noteably the marketing related information). All other information is purely unbiased and substantiated by the scientific studies referenced (I'm a healthcare guy). With this in mind, am I able to repost the page, add the "hangon" leader, and revise the content to not include any marketing related information? Originally, I thought this content would be of value to readers given the context in which I developed the page, but have since realized that it should not be included within Wikipedia pages. I am relatively new to the Wiki community and would love to hear your insights on improving this page so that it is at a quality/standard suitable for Wikipedia.

Thanks so much, Athaenara. I really appreciate your time and guidance. Have a great day and looking forward to your response.

Cheers,

(Ry4Health 17:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

It was quite overtly promotional, with most of the content nearly identical to that on the manufacturer's own web pages, but you can try Wikipedia:Deletion review. – Athaenara ✉ 22:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Law and Social Policy

Hi Athaenara,

I am trying to make a page about an organization and I keep getting it deleted. The information that I have about the organization is very basic and the format I am using is similar to other wiki pages that I have viewed that are also only about a organization. I was wondering what I need to do to the page in order for it to be allowed to be kept on the internet. I also wrote hang on to the page and wrote a small message below that but the page was deleted regardless. Thank you very much for your help. I appreciate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaanahall (talk • contribs) 18:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was both spam and a copyright violation of the organization's own website. Advice and suggestions were posted on your talk page, so review the messages there. – Athaenara ✉ 22:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Docupoint

Per your request, I fixed the DOCUPOINT company page to remove a few passages that could have been interpreted as advertising. I understand and hope the changed entry is now OK. Thx. Brad Bishop —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brad Bishop (talk • contribs) 20:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Qiqqa

Hi Athaenara - pls will you userfy me the Qiqqa code so that I can repost it once I have some external credibility. I thought I had 7 days :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmejardine (talk • contribs) 22:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. By the way, the seven day convention applies to articles for deletion and proposed deletion processes, not to {{db-g11}}. – Athaenara ✉ 22:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Qiqqa revisited

Hi Athaenara - hope you are well. I have spent some time revisiting the Qiqqa entry to remove any subjective opinion from the copy text. What stands now is just factual information (I hope!). Could you please reconsider whether it now meets your standards of a factual piece of information? It is currently living under my user page / Qiqqa.

Thanks, Jimme —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmejardine (talk • contribs) 16:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is subject to Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. You could move it back to article space (see Help:Moving a page for how to do that) and await results. – Athaenara ✉ 21:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CaliforniaWineLover

Wikipedia criteria for speedy deletion excludes the sandbox and the users' own user space. This was a test page within the user space so that I could work out the formatting of articles using information that I had handy. If I was posting outside of the my own user space please let me know. CaliforniaWineLover (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2010 (UTC)CaliforniaWineLover[reply]

RoboCoaster

Hi,

I created the RoboCoaster wiki page today but you deleted it (G11). I tried to follow the example set by other roller coaster manufacturers, why has it been deleted? Who can i get to check it and make sure it's right etc if i redo it?

I only started using wiki yesterday! Help!

(Discoeagles (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I've undeleted it for now. If it's deleted again, try Deletion review. – Athaenara ✉ 23:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bogle Stroll

Hello,

I have removed your speedy-G11 tag from this article because I believe the article is not so promotional in tone that it would "require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic." I agree that it has some problems with tone and style, but the subject appears to be notable (per Google News) and I believe the article is fixable.

Thparkth (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Meteo Show

Athaenara,

Earlier today, the new article titled "The Meteo Show" was deleted from Wikipedia. It was claimed to be insignificant, but I believe this to be a mistake. Is there any way the article could be revived for slight revisions, or at least the original text to be sent to me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Banjo999 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The youtube phenomenon you're attempting to add to Wikipedia fails the notability guideline, but you may ask one of the admins in this category for a copy. – Athaenara ✉ 01:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Open wireless architecture

Hey. You deleted the article as spam and copyvio, but the copyvio claim doesn't hold since OTRS persmission had been received. Would you mind reconsidering your deletion? - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 11:17, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's spam. I won't restore it, but you can try deletion review. – Athaenara ✉ 22:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Chang

deleted page

Hi, I encountered a deleted page under Jeff Chang (poker player)

Can I please receive a copy of the old page and also any tips on what exactly constituted the page for deletion. this way I can learn for the future. thank you very much —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter86754 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

retrieving deleted post

Hi, is there a way i can retrieve my deleted post of jeff chang poker player for my own reference and so I can re evaluate my mistakes. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter86754 (talk • contribs) 00:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bren School of Environmental Science & Management

Hello,

The article/page I posted today about the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management at UC Santa Barbara was deleted. After I wrote it, I received a warning that it could qualify for quick deletion. I read the reasons for that, understood them and then set out to address them, removing anything that did not occur to me as "encyclopedic" and recasting the article in a "neutral" tone. I then re-saved the page. I see articles for institutions of higher learning all over wikipedia and cannot understand why mine was deleted.

I did receive a couple of notes after the article was deleted, and referencing line 8 and line 15. But since the article has been deleted, I have no way of knowing what those lines were or what offenses I may have committed within them.

People do look for the Bren School, and for graduate schools in general, and people do use Wikipedia to find them. I am new authoring on Wikipedia and am trying to do it right. Any guidance appreciated. I'd especially like to have a copy, at least, of my deleted page and a tip on how to fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brenwikiedit (talk • contribs) 00:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Global Hotel Alliance

You previously deleted a page entitled Global Hotel Alliance for blatant advertising tone. The page has now been redone and I would appreciate your comments and approval to make it more relevant for Wikipedia. Vickyelliot (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mentez

Athaenara,

I created a talk page for Mentez to request the creation of that article. I thought I did everything necessary to request the page. -- I explicitly stated that I had a conflict of interest. -- I tried to give as much information as possible

You left me a message on my User_talk:Malandrew page. As far as I can tell I followed the COI guidelines completely. Where did I go wrong?

I would like to re-submit a request for the creation of this article, but I need to know what mistake I made so i don't make it again.

Thanks,

Andrew

P.S. The page in question: Talk:Mentez#Proposed_addition :was deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Malandrew (talk • contribs) 18:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A link to Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations was included in the {{uw-coi}} posted to you. If you find that insufficient, you can try the conflict of interest noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 23:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William Grauer

Hi there,

I had posted an article on William Grauer on Wikipedia a few months ago which you had deleted. I revised the article significantly (a copy is below). I re-posted as well. What other changes might you recommend I make to help make the article qualify? The individual I am writing about argued a monumental case for the Supreme Court. I appreciate your help, as this is my first Wiki article. Happy to incorporate any suggestions you might have.

I understand I also need to make sure it is not an orphaned article. Is there a minimum number of sites that I should link it to so as not to be orphaned?

Thank you!

Article copy: [removed]

Computerperson4000 (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiren's Boot CD

The article was not an advertisement at all, and this is coming from a viewer of said article only (I never edited it).

I occasionally viewed this article to keep up-to-date on Hiren's Boot CD which is (and will be for a good while) a Boot CD that many poorer techies use to learn about various software contained in said CD.

Please undelete it, and make a proposal for deletion, rather than simply deleting it without merit.

I have a feeling you'll find many people with similar views if you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.181.17 (talk) 08:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether you were aware of the articles for deletion discussion (link above). Notability was in doubt and the article had no sources other than the product's proprietary website. If you wish to pursue it further, I can recommend Wikipedia:Deletion review. – Athaenara ✉ 08:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Glor

Hi there - I noticed there was a page for Jeff Glor (CBS News correspondent and anchor) that was created awhile back, but then deleted, in April. I was just wondering if there was anything factually incorrect on the page or if there's any other information I can give you to update it. This is Nicole Glor writing, Jeff's wife. Thanks so much. You can also reach Jeff at glorj@cbsnews.com if you need to verify anything.

Nicole Glor nicole@gtmediacomm.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.27.242 (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created in April 2009. After it was tagged in April 2010 as a copyright violation of http://election.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/13/eveningnews/main2680551.shtml , the original author requested deletion per {{db-g7}}. – Athaenara ✉ 01:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Glor's page as delete...trying to figure out why....can anyone help?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeff_Glor&action=edit&redlink=1

03:02, 24 April 2010 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "Jeff Glor" ‎ (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)

Dfarber (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)dfarber[reply]

See my previous reply above. – Athaenara ✉ 19:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Day poster 2010 3c.jpg

Hi there,

I am inquiring as to the deletion of the image "Bad Day poster 2010 3c.jpg", which was flagged as a copyright violation. As this artwork was created by us using our own photographic materials I am at a bit of a loss as to whose copyright is being violated?

As a newbie to Wikipedia postings I would welcome any further clarification about this matter, and whether this image can be re-instated.

TIAAland62 (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to the file log, it was deleted per {{db-g7}}. – Athaenara ✉ 11:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Litera

I'm confused about why the page was deleted so quickly. I'm new to wiki and reviewed a bunch of the help articles before writing and posting. I know I deleted the speedy deletion template, but that was inadvertant. I interpreted the directions as if you write on the talk page you delete the tags and the discussion takes place there. I had a few other users help with editing the page and none of them thought it was advertising. I'm hoping you can point out what specifically made you think it was advertising? I'd like the opportunity to fix the page before it is deleted. From the time it was tagged until it was deleted was less than a hour. Thanks for your help. Docexpert101 (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to proceed with this in spite of the {{uw-coi}} and other information posted on your talk page (which I hope you have read), you can try Wikipedia:Deletion review and/or the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 14:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to be confrontational here, I'm just trying to figure out how to change the tone or delete content that is promtional. I posted something on the Litera talk page saying the same thing, and next thing I knew the page was gone and there was no opportunity for discussion. I'm just looking for how to improve the article. I have read my talk page, but all it did was state statues and rules but didn't tell me how or why my page fell under those. I understand you think there is a COI, but there isn't. (I don't see much point in trying to convince you of that.) I understand you think its advertisting, but I'm asking why? It doesn't assert one product or company is better than others, it gives a description of what the company does, products offered and clients. I've looked at other companies pages, like Masterfoods, and feel like the Litera page followed the same format and had a similar tone. Again, I'm not being confrontational, I'm trying to make it right because I worked hard. Thanks. Docexpert101 (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those notices offer and link to good advice, so please read them. Your article duplicates content from the company's website, blogs, and press releases which offer its own view of itself, without citing independent reliable sources attesting to its notability. It's promotional, not encyclopedic. I don't care to be confrontational, either. – Athaenara ✉ 15:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HPC Advisory Council

Why the page for HPC Advisory Council was deleted?

There are pages for commercial companies, such as IBM, Cray etc, and I dont see a reason to delete a page that review the history of the HPC Advisory Council. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.237.3 (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was written by the HPC Advisory Council chairman, tagged {{db-spam}} by another Wikipedia editor for deletion as advertising or promotion, and subsequently deleted. – Athaenara ✉ 21:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So why was it deleted? I know that it was deleted, but the issue that I dont agree with the data being deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.237.3 (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me rephrase that. The article was written by the chairman of the HPC Advisory Council (see the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline). It was tagged and later deleted as advertising or promotion (see Wikipedia:Spam). – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tata Communications

Hi,

I used to maintain the Wikipedia entry for Tata Communications. I saw it's been deleted this month for blatant advertising. Since I hadn't made any updates for close to 2 months now, Would it be possible to access the page history and content (and if possible, the final edit responsible for the page's being tagged as advertising) so we can correct it?

Ashish Tewari —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.244.73.4 (talk) 06:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After TataCommunications was blocked, you registered as Technologyusa and continued to edit. Neither account was used for any encyclopedic purpose, but rather to edit articles about your company solely.

You, the online marketing manager for your company, need to understand that single-purpose accounts with a conflict of interest have no credibility here when they are used solely to promote particular commercial interests (see Wikipedia:Spam). – Athaenara ✉ 07:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Axelrod

I don't fully understand your targeting for deletion of this article. This article was not intended to promote the doctor, merely, just to serve as a informative collection of her notable work on Breast Cancer. Based on her research and media appearances, it should be evident that the individual does qualify. You cite "conflict of interest." I assume this is because I work for the individual, however, who would know more about that person than a primary source? Should wikipedia be writen by secondary sources instead?

The language quoted on the other website was written primarily by myself. I request that the page be undeleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkayal (talk • contribs) 05:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It turned up in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, perhaps as a result of new pages patrol, and was essentially a curriculum vitae or résumé, not an encyclopedia article. If you haven't read our policies and guidelines or any of the other helpful pages which were linked in messages on your talk page, please do so now. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It turned up there because of what it claimed to be a copyright violation from another page, however, I wrote that page as well and have full rights to its use. I have read the policies and guidelines, and respectfully, I would like to point out that it is in compliance and is not "unambigous promotion" as you have flagged and does not require a substantial rewrite under G11. I would like the opportunity to insert the references to each research papers abstract and references to the IMBD re: the media appearances as well. I will also rewrite the first section to summarize it if it continues to be flagged. Re: it beign a "CV" I based the format of the article on other notable MDs. Perhaps flagging it for correction would have been a more appropriate action as opposed to deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkayal (talk • contribs) 14:42, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you compare the current version with the one you deleted on July 25? I almost tagged it as spam before I even realized it had already been deleted as such once before. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's essentially a résumé created by one of the subject's employees, who blanked the warnings from his or her user talk page (diff) after re-creating the article. In my view, it qualifies for {{db-spam}} as repeatedly created by a single-purpose account with no interest in the encyclopedia other than promoting Axelrod. Have you considering posting the problem on the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard? – Athaenara ✉ 05:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woodbridge Group

I dont understand what you admins think is wrong with this article. It simply provides factual evidence that would be found in any database and is of value to those interested in investment banking and financial services. I think its a crime to remove the article due to "self promotion" when different articles from 60 to 70 other banks, styled in exactly the same way have been allowed to remain. I cant think of one good reason for removing this article when other articles targeted for speedy deletion are clearly jokes and spam---- not kidding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario989 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butcher Burns

Hi Athaenara

I am interested in recreating a page that I drafted (under a different username - i forgot my password) for Butcher Burns LLP. I do not seek to activly promote the company but I think it has a right to a presence on Wikipedia. Last time I made the page, it was deleted without me really getting a chance to discuss this with anyone.

If you can help, I would appreciate it.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgglasby (talk • contribs) 14:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Assassyn

Wondering what section of the page for Hollywood Assassyn you deleted was considered Advertising? I used the Mobile Band page as a template to create the Hollywood Assassyn page. Also, can I retrieve the work for editing? Hollywoodassassyn (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Labdoo

Our page was deleted

Hi Athaenara, I was writing an article about a humanitarian project we are developing. The project is non profit. What i was writing in the article is how the project works, because we thought this could be a way to share knowledge. The concepts we describe there are related to the work by some economists in the economic field of commons-based peer production, so we were writing the article for informative reasons, not for advertisement.

Perhaps i misunderstood how wikipedia articles need to be written, but i've seen many other ngos having a description of their organizations in the wiki so was trying to mimic that. What should i correct to get my article accepted? kindly advice. Our page is: Labdoo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordi.ros (talk • contribs) 23:03, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't understand the {{uw-coi}} information posted on your own talk page, you may be able to get additional advice on the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 00:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks, I was not aware about the talk page. In my talk page, i had a copyright warning message for the images i uploaded, since i had not added the copyright. I have just fixed this, and added a GNU license to each of the figures i uploaded. In addition, there is a coi warning in my talk page. I believe the article is written in a neutral language, but it does include a small paragraph in it explaining how our project compares to traditional humanitarian projects. It was not intended to be a competitive statement, the paragraph does not say our approach is better, it just mentions the difference, the two approaches are complementary. If I delete such section, will you be able to accept our article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordi.ros (talk • contribs) 06:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The conflict of interest warning on your talk page links pertinent guidelines and policies with which you should familiarize yourself. As I said in my previous message, the conflict of interest noticeboard may be more helpful to you. – Athaenara ✉ 07:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, if that's ok, i am going to work again on the page under my domain :Jordi.ros/Labdoo without publishing it to the global domain, and when ready, i will try to publish it again. Perhaps i can seek your advice before publishing it again to the global domain. I will read again the coi noticeboard, i think i might need to keep the page really short and informative. --Jordi.ros (talk) 08:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{WikiProject Computing}} lends support to articles such as Computer recycling, so their talk page* seems a good place to ask for assistance with things like article organization, sourcing, appropriate categories (such as Category:Computers and environmental issues), etc. Good luck. – Athaenara ✉ 09:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

* (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing)

Idol Radec

Hi, my previous Idol Radec post was deleted. And I completely understand why because I didn't have a clue of what I was doing. Below is the new page I'd like to submit. Please let me know if I've made any mistakes that need to be corrected before I submit. Thank you so much.

[ spam removed 01:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC) ]

Nooniekas (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The version you posted here would very likely be tagged {{db-g11}} for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising / promotion. See the Wikipedia:Spam guideline for more information. – Athaenara ✉ 21:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ODABA

Hi Athaenara,

I tried to provide an article about ODABA, but it has been deleted immediately. The reason to add this article was that ODABA is listed in the list ob object-oriented database management systems, but without any explanation (unresolved reference) what it is about. Similar to ObjectStore and other database systems in the list, I tried to provide a short definition, but, obviously, I made something wrong. Can you tell me, what went wrong? Maybe, it was a mistake, to choose the username ODABA. I noticed this the next day when the user had been deleted. I created a new user name and added the article again, unfortunately with a misspelled name Odaba, and hence, the reference in the database list is still unresolved, which I would like to correct in a proper way. I am not going to promote ODABA using Wikipedia. ODABA is Open Source (GPL) and exists since more than 15 years, and I would like to explain to people, what it is. Please, let me know, when Wikipedia is not the right place for publishing this sort of knowledge.

Thank you for helping me Nadja —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadja1960 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tera Melos

Regarding the Removal of Tera Melos' Band Page

Athaenara,

What level of significance/importance do bands' pages need to prove the bands have garnered in order for them to be safe from deletion by you and your cohorts? Do 1,759 people on Facebook [external link redacted] who label themselves as fans of the band contribute at all to their level of significance? Does 22236 friends on their Myspace Music [external link redacted] page contribute? How about 1254 followers on Twitter [external link redacted]? I believe all of those followers and fans believe Tera Melos are important.

But I have a feeling neither you nor your Wikifriends care about them in the slightest.

How about the fact that they are an essentially genre-less band (or at least are striving to be genre-less) thriving in a music culture whose inhabitants' main goal is to sound the most like others who have already come and gone? I don't really see why The Airborne Toxic Event has any more right to retain a Wikipedia page than Tera Melos. Is it their level of renown that puts them past the point of 'unimportant' into the realm of 'important'?

Furthermore, why delete the page outright? Is it really so important for you and the other self-labeled 'Curators' and 'Cleaners' and 'Librarians' to add another page deletion to your list? Why not put the page on a sort of probationary period so that its frequenters (of which there are many in this case, I assure you) can have the chance to right the wrongs you all have imposed upon the page?

I understand that without guidelines and rules and moderators working to keep this place neat, it wouldn't be a tenth of the fantastic thing that it is now. I also admit that I am not exactly a master of all things related to Wikipedia, not by a long shot. But I do believe that perhaps there is a point where things need to be reassessed. Again, I admit I am new to this entire thing and only an infrequent browser of Wikipedia. I just have a strong moral compass, and despite my personal bias toward the band whose page you have aided in the deletion of, I feel doing what you have done without warning is wrong and unfair.

I hope you will reconsider your actions. There are a lot of upset people.

--76.124.172.82 (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Notability (music) guideline may help you (I did not edit, tag, or delete either article). – Athaenara ✉ 21:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CnR Create

Deletion of our wikipedia entry - explanaition request

Hi Althaenara, I saw that you reviewed and deleted my entry to Wikipedia for CnR Create. I would appreciate if you can comment on your reasoning:

1) I took a reference from an EXISTING Wikipedia entry from Bond No.9 - and we basically copied entirely the way THEY presented themselves.

2) Now if Bond Nr. 9 can publish their Wikipedia entry in the way they did - why would ours be deleted and not allowed to be published ? We do not intend to publish ANYTHING DIFFERENT than they (or for the matter other perfume companies) did.

I would appreciate to understand this better. Furthermore it would be valuable to know more about if we need to change something what this would have to be.

Kind regards

Andreas Kolar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.10.136.227 (talk) 13:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You created it using a single-purpose account named for the company (see the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline and the {{uw-coi}} warning posted on that account's talk page). It was tagged {{db-g11}} for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline). Bond No. 9 was similarly created, tagged, and deleted. – Athaenara ✉ 21:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Athaenara,

I saw that Bond Nr. 9 has been taken out from Wikipedia - so the behavior of Wikipedia is now consistent. We appreciate your comments as to how to add an article to Wikipedia and the reasoning for taking out our company CnR Create is now understandable.

We will look into how to improve - and ask an independent person to write an independent view of our company. In case this still does not work we may just accept not to be listed on Wikipedia. Our purpose to be listed is not for advertising - we have many other means to achieve advertising through the internet, but to allow people to know about the company.

In the meantime - thanks and appreciate your swift reaction.

AK —Preceding unsigned comment added by CnRCreate (talk • contribs) 10:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley V. Henson, Jr.

→ in re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley V. Henson, Jr.

You just deleted an article where another editor had added a speedy delete tag a few minutes ago. The speedy was added believing that the primary author requested deletion. This is not entirely the truth. The individual that added the speedy was not the primary author. Nor has the article been edited entirely by one editor. The article is currently at AfD with open discussion. The editor has been indef blocked for disruptive editing and blanking the AfD page, among other actions. The latest tag was added by another editor a bit late to the party, responding to old issues and requests. Cindamuse (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. – Athaenara ✉ 20:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thamks. While I think it's best the article be deleted, the AfD should run its course. Cindamuse (talk) 06:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Talkatics is back

→ see also: user page log

Howdy. You deleted User:Talkatics as a CSD:G11 yesterday, and it has re-emerged in its original form. Thought you'd want to know. Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, and thanks for the heads up. After I re-tagged it as spam, the page was re-deleted by another admin who blocked the account as well. – Athaenara ✉ 00:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Marketing Excellence, Inc

I'm confused about rating this article as Unambiguous Advertisting or Promotion. We included no advertising in the article, listing what we do but never once encouraging people to visit our website or do business with us. Our goal in creating an article was to allow people in our community to find information about our company; our logo appears in several areas in the community because of the high level of community engagement we perform, and we wanted people to be able to find out more about us.

The majority of the article was designed to provide a history of the company, list community engagement and involvement, and describe technologies that we have contributed to the direct marketing arena through our own internal development. We linked to several charitable organizations for whom we perform services, thus verifying our claims, and while we are not nationally known we are notable within our own community.

Finally, every effort was made to ensure a neutral tone, avoiding marketing speak. I would like to do anything possible to make the article conform to Wikipedia standards. Thank you for your assistance. Jimkennel (talk) 21:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parris Cues

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parris_Cues

Athaenara, I have read you conflict of interest information and have already requested that my account be unlocked so as to change my username, any assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. At the time of creation I was unaware that the use of a business name was an issue.

The intended use of this Wiki page is not for advertising or promotion, but to enable users to be better informed about the organisation. Main aim was to ensure that information posted was factual and correct, with the best interest of the Wiki community in mind. The only reason an external link to the Parris Cues website was included was to satisfy the 'content must be referenced to a valid source' rule, so as to avoid deletion.

Also as there is a current wiki page regarding John Parris, (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Parris) the intention is to refer the pages to each other to enhance the content of both.

213.212.75.70 (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Athaenara, I have changed username and resubmitted a revised artice (Parris Cues) that has been vetted by other Admins on my talk page. Ccfreeman (talk) 22:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to warn or block user John J Bulten

Greetings,

This user

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:John_J._Bulten [John J. Bulten (talk · contribs) banned through February 2012]

is pushing his anti-science, fundamentalist views, engaging in original research, and now edit-warring.

He is an editor from a right-wing, ideological website and is thus pushing an agenda. His edits are akin to anti-science fundamentalists attempting to take over articles on Darwinism and evolution.

In any case, this certainly needs the attention of a third-party, reliable admin.Ryoung122 18:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-seed

→ in re: INGfertility (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Darb8033 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
→ see also: User talk:Athaenara/Archive 9#INGfertility and Darb8033

Looks like you deleted Pre-Seed and I blocked the original editor for username vios. Can you take a look at the notes the new user has left on my talk page about wanting to try again. There are a bunch of different issues (copyvio / OR) that they have introduced through their requests, but in the spirit of growing (rather than limiting) the project I was thinking about giving them another chance as long as they are willing to follow the rules. Your thoughts? 7 01:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not inclined to cut much slack for coi spas. If the product has truly achieved notability, it shouldn't be difficult for uninvolved parties to write an appropriately sourced and encylopedic article about it. You may get more feedback on the COI noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 02:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cayman Karting

Request for further information

Could you provide more details on why the Cayman Karting page was deleted without discussion? In terms of notability this was written to provide information on a national sports facility and many other articles exist on other kart tracks around the world - Category:Karting_venues. It was written from a neutral point of view with multiple internal links and referenced through links to many online national newspaper articles. Much time was taken to ensure that the article provided detailed, accurate and referenced factual content. Thanks. Caymandriver (talk) 12:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PALA

→ in re: Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 21#Polish American Librarians Association (PALA)
→ see also: user Palalib (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hi,

An editor objected to your recent speedy deletion of Polish American Librarians Association (PALA) at WP:REFUND. While REFUND isn't quite the venue for overturning speedy deletions, I thought a dialog might be helpful. If you get a moment please drop by and leave a note at the discussion. Thanks. Protonk (talk) 18:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I commented there. – Athaenara ✉ 22:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bombard Renewable Energy

Request to redo the Bombard Renewable Energy page

Hi I am new to Wikipedia and i recently created a Bombard Renewable Energy page without knowledge/reading the wiki's guide. However, I have read through the guidance and I understand what major mistake I made on my first wiki page. Is it possible for you to allow me to recreate the Bombard Renewable Energy page, that follow the Wikipedia's rules and guidance? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokoyoshi (talk • contribs) 06:45, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From the deleted article's talk page:

Hi I am new at this Wikipedia and I am currently working on a Wikipedia page for my company that I am working with,Bombard Renewable Energy. Please give me some time to do some changes to meet Wikipedia's requirement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokoyoshi (talk • contribs) 18:42, 8 October 2010
Hello and welcome, but please have a read of WP:Conflict of interest. Thanks, Top Jim (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the info cna you look over my page again and see if I shift the "tone" of the page? Thanks in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokoyoshi (talk • contribs) 19:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
It's mostly a copy & paste of marketing boilerplate from your company's website, and will almost certainly be deleted shortly. Top Jim (talk) 19:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Your company may or may not be notable (see the Notability (organizations and companies) guideline). It would be best to wait until independent editors without your conflict of interest see fit to write a neutral and appropriately referenced article about it. – Athaenara ✉ 00:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WwTrails.org – World Wide Trails Archive

Hello! I have posted an article about a website wwTrails.org. This is a website that archiving hiking and mountain bike trails around the world. If you are a trail lover, you know how hard it is to find trails in new places, when you go on vacation for example. wwTrails.org designed to deals with this issue, allowing its visitors to find, review and take virtual ride on trails in unknown territory, all over the world. Copyrights wise, I have wrote every word in this article, none was copied from the Internet, and the entire article review the trails subject from a very uncommon view point, and provide natural information about the ability of wwTrails.org. Although wwTrails is only about a year old it has 10s of thousands trails in it, and several unique features. Would you please visit the website and judge for your self? I took freedom to send you few links that demonstrate best what this website is all about.

The 2 reasons for the deletetion: 1. Copyrights - 100% of this article was written by me. All external links are going to a website I created and 100% own. None was copied and paste or taken from other site or other authors. 2. Promotion - It is true that visitors that would read about the website and will visit it will promote it, but the website is a .org, completely free for everyone, is cover an important issue for those who loves trails and is an institute on its own rights. 3. Wikipedia ask to be extra careful where conflict of interest may be, such as in my case where I write about a website I have made, but please read the article and you'll find no ranking (such ans Yah - Very good site -you must go there) no denounce over other websites (such as "Unlike other bad website the good wwTrails is so and so) an no promotional language involved. The article is informative and objective, and express neither express positive nor negative opinion.

I do request that 1. Please visit the links below and judge for your self. 2. Please reconsider and reinstate the article.

Nothing is wrong when private individual create a significant work that can benefit the public and genuinely try to inform people who may be interested.

I do hop that you'll visit and reconsider the website.

Thank you so, Tal Bahir.

Links:

[linkspam removed]

Please look at the bottom of the page and you'll find my name as the copyrights owner. Last, if you choose not to publish the article, please refer me to a list of requirements that once satisfied the article will be published. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talbahir (talk • contribs) 13:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that your page, which had no reliable independent sources supporting its content, qualified for {{db-g11}} deletion as a commercial for your website. Please read the neutral point of view policy and the notability (web) guideline if there is any uncertainty in your mind about the informative pages linked in the {{uw-coi}} warning on your talk page. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 22:22, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Athaenara. Would you be kind enough as to clue me where would I find reliable independent source for the new features included in that website? Would it be proper to create links to pages demonstrated the features described in the article? Do I have to wait till the website will become a powerhouse before it can have a place in Wikipedia? I'd like to think that there should be a way to describe it on Wikipedia for it is a piece of information that is useful and genuine for those who are closed to the subject. I do know that you should avoid usage of Wikipedia as a commercial platform for financial gain, but is the dividing line between Wikipedia values and spam is drawn where someone may benefit from a Wikipedia article? Please clue me which way path I take that will satisfy Wikipedia's demand and will allow wwTrails to be value in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.103.87 (talk) 05:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wwTrails

Dear Athaenara. Would you be kind enough as to clue me where would I find reliable independent source for the new features included in that website? Would it be proper to create links to pages demonstrated the features described in the article? Do I have to wait till the website will become a powerhouse before it can have a place in Wikipedia? I'd like to think that there should be a way to describe it on Wikipedia for it is a piece of information that is useful and genuine for those who are closed to the subject. I do know that you should avoid usage of Wikipedia as a commercial platform for financial gain, but is the dividing line between Wikipedia values and spam is drawn where someone may benefit from a Wikipedia article? Please clue me which way path I take that will satisfy Wikipedia's demand and will allow wwTrails to be value in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talbahir (talk • contribs) 05:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Notability (web)#Criteria. – Athaenara ✉ 19:52, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Migration Specialties

If I modify the content of the Migration Specialties page as follows, to outline our company, is that acceptable? Basically I'll modify the introduction as below and only place a link to our website in the links section, dropping all other content. Our goal is to have a Wikipedia page that counters our competitor Stromasys while staying within Wikipedia guidelines.

"Founded in 1992, Migration Specialties International, Inc. is a privately held corporation focused on living up to its mission statement of Continuity in Computing through preservation of critical legacy software applications. The companies' solutions range from software migrations between platforms to full virtualization of legacy hardware on modern host systems.

Migration Specialties offers specific solutions for OpenVMS and Tru64 Unix operating systems; Digital PDP-11, VAX hardware; Digital, Compaq, and HP AlphaServer hardware; and HP 2100 and 1000 hardware (A400, A600, A700, A900, A990). The company also offers OpenVMS porting services to HP Integrity servers.

The company is headquartered in Florence, Colorado. It has offices in the Netherlands and agents in the UK and Puerto Rico."

Bclaremont (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BIPAC

→ in re: BIPAC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Yudanashi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and 74.96.186.205 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
→ see also: Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 45#BIPAC article and many external links added by representative of group

Deleted page BIPAC and its creator under discussion on COI Noticeboard

I see that you agreed that the BIPAC article was an ad, and thus speedy-deleted it. That page's creator has also been adding many links to a website owned by BIPAC; I have requested help dealing with that problem here. I undid a few of the links myself but there really are a pile of them, so if there exists some automated tool to get rid of them all at once, that would be great. betsythedevine (talk) 02:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed several more (rollback is handy). – Athaenara ✉ 02:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Today I am less of a noob as I have reviewed the WP:COI and other policies and have learned much. The external links were clearly a COI and should be removed. I will go through and delete the ~20 links I made. However, I still disagree that the article was an ad, but I am more than willing to look at it from a completely different perspective and rewrite it. I ask that you restore the article, add a tag for Speedy deletion under G11 and allow me to tag it with a hangon tag giving me very little time, but time enough, to make substantial changes to the article. Is this acceptable to you? Yudanashi (talk) 18:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yudanashi and the (new) BIPAC article are now under dispute again on here. betsythedevine (talk) 19:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NSU SSC

Hi, The page north south university social services club nsussc was deleted by you.my sincere apologies if the page violated rules.however the article was aimed at readers knowing about youth social activities in a poor country. And I would have evebtuaally added details.I request you to reconsider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Midad Arif (talk • contribs) 00:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lilith (photographer)

Hi. You deleted the subject page. Would you please userfy it to User:Gasteren/Lilith (photographer) so that we might get it up to this project's standards or copy it to another project? Thanks! — $Jeff G. ツ$ 04:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer not to do that for spam-generating single purpose accounts such as Gasteren (he can try requests for undeletion if he wishes). – Athaenara ✉ 06:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understand. In that case, would you mind commenting on his sole remaining content contribution to WMF projects (a photo of Lilith (photographer)) at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lilith in 2010.jpg? Thanks again! — $Jeff G. ツ$ 02:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia {{db-g7}} makes that easy, but speedy deletion on Commons seems to be more complicated; I don't know what to recommend. – Athaenara ✉ 02:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have replied there. I was looking for a characterization of the spam and the spammer's character. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 17:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas DeMark

Hi Athaenara,

I posted an article about Thomas DeMark on 10/24/10 that you deleted 10/25/10. Tom is highly respected on Wall Street- known as the Markets Wizard's Wizard. His is actually being considered for a Nobel Prize for his work. I was concerned that www.marketstudies.com might appear as an advertisment, however I dont have any other current public content to provide users as a reference. Please let me know how I can get a post about Tom DeMark to persist. Thank you. Roderick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbentley9 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any verifiable references from reliable sources to use in building the article? — $Jeff G. ツ$ 17:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DeOlivera Twigg Eubanks Creative

Question Regarding Removal of DeOlivera Twigg Eubanks Creative

I am inquiring as to the specific reasons my post for "DeOlivera Twigg Eubanks Creative" was removed and labeled as ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion.) Granted, I am new to Wikipedia in that this was my first attempt at publication; however, I believe my article maintained a stringent adherence to the guidelines at Wikipedia:Starting an article. Furthermore, I am curious as to how the Leo Burnett Worldwide and Crispin Porter + Bogusky articles remain published when DTE Creative has garnished nearly as many accolades, has maintained corporate growth for nearly 4 decades and is largely attributed to having solely provoked a major industry shift in the early 80's. Perhaps my article was prematurely published? If so I do understand; however, it was my intention to have other individuals expand upon the initial publication and citations as that is the working model of Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your time and prompt attention to this matter as my attempt at publication of this article is time sensitive due to it's affiliation with a school project. Lastly, any advise you can provide in appropriately editing the article prior to resubmission would be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

-Ashton F. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashtonfields (talk • contribs) 18:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was written from the Austineubanks account and identical to your {{userspace draft}}. Please read the {{uw-coi}} which was posted on your user talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 21:50, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stromasys

Deletion of the Wikipedia page "Stromasys"

Dear Athaenara,

recently you deleted the Wikipedia-page about the company Stromasys and its products. Apparently this page did not conform to Wikipedia´s content policy. I´d be grateful if you could explain to me your objections to the content, so that we can create a page that conforms to Wikipedia´s policy.

Thank you in advance for your help in this matter.

Best regards Tanja Semet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boogaart (talk • contribs) 14:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So that your company can create a page? Please read the {{uw-coi}} information posted on your user talk page, particularly Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations. – Athaenara ✉ 20:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by future HDI projections of UN

The page should be restored. G7 doesn't apply (multiple authors) and the page wasn't blanked. See Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates#FLC tagged for speedy deletion for a discussion on this. Imzadi 1979 → 20:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 21:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd asked for deleting the page List of countries by future HDI projections of UN, beacuse I really was the author of the substantial content of the page! Do you know of any other substantial author? I ask you again to delete the page I created. It's based on a research no longer valid, as I expalained on the talk page, and I was the author of the substantial content of the page. Cohneli (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be best if discussion progresses toward a result upon which all concerned may agree rather than insisting upon {{db-g7}}. – Athaenara ✉ 22:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But I created the page, and everybody can realize that I'm the only substantial author! You suggest that the discussion progresses toward a result, but the discusstion ended in my declaration that I'm the only author of the page, and nobody has responded to that! Why can't I put a {{db-g7}} where I'm the only substantial author? Which "result" should we wait for, whereas nobody succeeds to refute my claim that I'm the only substantial author? Which another substantial author does anybody know of? Would you do me a favor? Just check out and realize that I'm the only substantial author! Cohneli (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed deletion (diff) based on the reasoning in your 16:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC) post on the article talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 00:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me:

1. According to Wikipedia guidelines, can an editor place a {{db-g7}} request, when this editor is the only one who contributed the substantial content of the page?

2. Would you like to do me a favor? To follow the following description of the sequence of events, which proves (by clear diffs) that I was the only editor who contributed the substantial content of the page?

3. After having read this description, do you agree that I was the only editor who contributed the substantial content of the page?

Here is the sequence of events, which proves that User:Cohneli was the only editor who contributed the substantial content of the page.

On 19:24, 24 October 2010: User:Cohneli created the page.

19:24, 24 October 2010, and 19:39, 24 October 2010: Two identical versions.

After 19:39, 24 October 2010, until 21:46, 24 October 2010: All edits made during this period were of User:Cohneli's.

21:46, 24 October, and 22:45, 24 October 2010: The only difference between these two versions was the change of the dashes "-" to the dashes "–".

After 22:45, 24 October 2010, until 08:44, 26 October 2010: All edits made during this period were of User:Cohneli's.

08:44, 26 October 2010, and 14:46, 29 October 2010: Two identical versions.

14:46, 29 October 2010, until 17:40, 30 October 2010: All edits made during this period were of User:Cohneli's.

17:40, 30 October 2010, and 18:49, 4 December 2010: Two identical versions.

18:49, 4 December 2010, until current version: All edits made during this period were of User:Cohneli's.

Cohneli (talk) 10:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[outdent] It could have been deleted (as it was) per your reasoning but the proverbial ton of bricks would then fall, courtesy of other editors who think the article can be salvaged and are updating it (primarily The Rambling Man). The situation has moved beyond db-author regardless of your assertion of ownership (please see the ownership of articles policy). If you wish to pursue it further, Editor assistance/Requests is one alternate venue. – Athaenara ✉ 22:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership? I've never claimed that. I'm just talking about by having been the only author who contributed the substantial content. When I asked to delete the article, you deleted it, and you based your decision on my being the only author (who contributed the substantial content), but some minutes later you restored it, although nobody had claimed that they had intended to "salvage" it. So why did you restore it? i.e. what was bad in your first decision to delete it? Cohneli (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, according to the nine diffs I described above, do you think that I can still be considered the only author who contributed the substantial content? Cohneli (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although I really don't want to be involved in this, I'll make an observation. Your contributions since your registration about six weeks ago indicate that you have shown an interest in only one article, which suggests that yours is not just a single-purpose account but a single-article account.

Apart from the apparent ownership issues which I mentioned last month, I don't know what's up with that, but if you still want the thing deleted you can follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion to open a community deletion discussion. – Athaenara ✉ 18:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response.

Re the single-article account: You're right, I don't want to be a "single-article" account, and this is one of the reasons why I want to delete this single article to which I contributed the substantial content, in order to be a "zero-article" account...:) Anyways, there is another reason for my desire to delete this article: I think it's a wrong article, which can never be updated, because it's based on an old methodology no longre used by UN, while the new methodology has another article!

Re the ownership issue, I have already responded to it, but you haven't referred to my response. See above my response, on 11 November, at 08:05.

Thank you for your advice to open community deletion discussion.

Thank you for your consent to "make an observation": I would like to know if you think that the nine diffs I presented above, prove that I can be considered the only author who contributed the substantial content to the article.

Cohneli (talk) 18:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can be but clearly other editors found your insistence on it to be an insufficient basis for deletion. I remind you of the statement displayed below the edit box on all Wikipedia pages:

If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.

Other than that, I have no further comments. – Athaenara ✉ 18:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The users who asked you to restore the article you had deleted, only claimed that I couldn't be the only author who contributed the substantial content to the article. However, they were wrong. Any other editor who presented any other claim (i.e. who claimed that the article can be updated), came up only after you restored the article you had deleted; Also this "other" claim was wrong (as I explained in my previous response), but this is another matter. I've only asked you about the substantial content, and thank you for your response. Cohneli (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FocusVision

I understand you deleted the page for FocusVision. It is the first time I write a page for Wikipedia and I modeled it after the iModerate page, which is a company similar to FocusVision. Can you explain where I fell short? I am willing to revise it if necessary.

For perspective, FocusVision is well know in the market research industry. In fact, FocusVision has become a generic name synonimous whith live streaming of focus groups, i.e., often clients ask to "focusvision" their focus groups. The company was even mentioned in Time magazine (one of teh reference I included) and on NBC (I could not find the clip). Thanks in advance for your response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grosgogeat (talk • contribs) 23:20, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article about your company was deleted per {{db-g11}} as unambiguous advertising. Please read the {{uw-coi}} information posted to your user talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 00:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is it different from the page for iModerate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grosgogeat (talk • contribs) 00:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both are self-promotional and created from single-purpose accounts with conflicts of interest (coi spas). I undeleted yours and re-tagged it. – Athaenara ✉ 02:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tks. I will revise it to remove the description about the services and keep it more generic. I hope it will address your concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grosgogeat (talk • contribs) 13:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I revised the article to remove all the advertising language and I asked one of the users (who has no connection to the company) to also edit the article. I hope it addresses your concerns. Otherwise, I will be glad to try again if you let me know the specific paragraphs that are still an issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grosgogeat (talk • contribs) 20:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insatanity Wikipedia Page deletion

This page should have not been deleted, It was not a repost, it had new information that was asked to be added to sustain it being a page. This page should be allowed to be. It was deleted for improper reasons and encompasses abuse of power by administrators. Ruinsofman (talk) 04:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Love Festival

Hello,

I attempted to write an article called One Love Festival, but I used that as my username and apparently it was seen as advertising, I have created a personal account and would like to reattempt the article to ensure it is seen as purely factual, is there anything that can be done?

Thank you in advance Mel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel Ruben (talk • contribs) 21:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Oaks Federal Credit Union

Athaenara, you deleted a page I created, Pacific Oaks Federal Credit Union, several months ago for "unambiguous advertising." As a Wikipedia newbie, I read all the cautionary notes about creating a page, and then modeled my page EXTREMELY close to Wescom Credit Union's page. During the deletion process, I pleaded for feedback from the Wiki storm troopers to no avail. The page was simply deleted. I truly attempted to follow the rules, used an abundance of caution in the language, and copied the format and form of a similar page on a similar topic. With the utmost deference, respect, and ring kissing and deep bowing, oh WikiGoddess, what may I do have the secret council restore this page? Or, are there just simply different rules for different folks, rendering wikipedia entirely unreliable and random? Shane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.227.79 (talk) 00:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MyOmanInfo

Hi Athaenara, MyOmanInfo page has been deleted although it is merely an information website. Please advise why it has been deleted. Thanks. MyOmanInfo team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myomaninfo (talk • contribs) 13:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lingerie Group

Did you mean to delete the page or tag it? here? --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 23:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To tag it. – Athaenara ✉ 00:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitol Media Solutions

Hi, I came to update office location information on Wikipedia for Capitol Media Solutions and the page has been deleted. I did not create the page, but I am one of a few people in charge of keeping Capitol Media online information updated. Can you provide us with information on why the page was deleted and what we need to do to get it back? Thank you. Callie@capitolmediasolutions.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.16.111.42 (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitol Media Solutions

In the process of updating my company information I came to Wikipedia to find that our page had been deleted. I was not the creator of the page and would like to make the changes necessary to get our article back up. Would you please forward the article that was previously posted so I can make the changes? You listed(Unambiguous advertising or promotion)as the reason it was deleted. Please contact me at 404.347.3316 or email me at Callie@capitolmediasolutions.com 68.16.111.42 (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your request for a copy of the article which was deleted as spam, consult my bulletin board above for the category of admins who may provide that.

As for your desire to have an article about your company on Wikipedia, please read the conflict of interest warnings on User talk:Andreahrizk. – Athaenara ✉ 18:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MCGHealth Inc

Hi there. I was wondering why my page was up for speedy deletion last week and then ultimately deleted? I know it was listed because of advertising purposes, but in no way was that the case, it was created with the intent of pure encyclopedic purposes much like other hospital and healthcare systems that are found on Wikipedia. Please advise the next step so I can improve upon this (the content) and not have this happen in the future. Thank you for your help and time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LFed25 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recreate MCGHealth page

Hi. I want to recreate the MCGHealth page with revised content. Any pointers to suggest? I've seen several articles that have the same points that I had in my original article (in fact I modeled it after other ones) and it still got deleted. Please advise. Thanks LFed25 (talk) 14:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your page was unambiguous advertising and promotion, regardless of your claim to the contrary, with no citations of independent reliable sources to demonstrate its notability. If you haven't read the {{uw-coi}} warnings on your talk page, please do so. – Athaenara ✉ 17:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calms Technologies

Why do you want to deleted my article? I just want to share the information with others, not to promote my company product. So, please don't delete my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakuraismail (talk • contribs) 08:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete my article...

Why do you want to deleted my article? I just want to share the information with others, not to promote my company product. So, please don't delete my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakuraismail (talk • contribs) 08:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Neeley

help please

I am unaware of how a redirect page is removed. I donated a full resolution notable file to Wikimedia that was once listed as figurenude_26_by_Curtis_Neeley.jpg that redirects now to figurenude_26_by_CN_Foundation.jpg or similar. Could you remove the redirect so that a 404 error would replace it? I am trying to keep my children from encountering my figurenude art while at schools etc. We have made a great deal of progress but I am afraid the redirect will support Google Inc continuing to display a thumbnail of a nude. Could you remove the redirect? Could you let me know of your response? Enjoy the holidays. CurtisNeeley (talk) 14:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That redirect doesn't actually exist on Wikipedia but on Wikimedia Commons, where I'm not an admin, so you'll have to ask over there about it, but I can follow through locally if you want another image to be deleted – Athaenara ✉ 18:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ma'am I will go there. I thought the two were the same. I will inquire there. I do not want anything deleted. I only want my name removed so it stops returning in safe searches by my daughter at school when searching for my name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CurtisNeeley (talk • contribs) 17:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eresourceinfotech

→ in re: user Eresourceinfotech (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block

I think a block is needed on User talk:Eresourceinfotech‎, he has now uploaded a new spam page. Cheers - [CharlieEchoTango] 06:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the heads-up. – Athaenara ✉ 07:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that, thanks. Cheers - [CharlieEchoTango] 07:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zamora

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamora (musician) (May 2010)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Zamora (January 2007)
User:Fandezamora/Zamora (pianist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Angel2021 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Dr.luigibenedetti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Katydelmar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Angelamuziotti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Fans de zamora (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Fandezamora (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Zamorafan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Alejandrozamora (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Zamora (musician) now at (pianist)

Greetings! You deleted Zamora (musician) earlier this evening as blatant spam and protected the page. Angel2021 (talk · contribs) has created a new version at Zamora (pianist). I don't see the spam issues, although the article is heavy on the bibliography and discography and lacking in prose. It's also very weakly sourced. Is this okay to move back to the prior title, or do you have the same concerns? —C.Fred (talk) 04:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like you, I deleted one version; Courcelles protected it. – Athaenara ✉ 15:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Michelakis

Please restore my User Page

Dear Athaenara,

Please restore my user page...User:Michelakis. I was not using it as a means of self-promotion or advertising. It simply contained auto biographical information and a list of all the websites referencing that information. The link with my name Mike Michelakis and the page User:Michelakis/Mike Michelakis were also deleted. Please restore these as well. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelakis (talk • contribs) 03:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I restored my User Page following Wikipedia Guidelines per John CD (Talk). Thank you. Michelakis —Preceding undated comment added 05:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Cardiffer

You may want to delete again and salt the article. The guy keeps coming back and re-creating. Thanks. Regards, --Manway (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spam deleted again, user blocked. – Athaenara ✉ 09:48, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Wikipedia user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Athaenara/Archive_8.