User talk:AugustusAudax

Hello, AugustusAudax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 04:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Hi and welcome!

Hi @AugustusAudax, thanks for joining the wikipedia editor community!

It's great that you're being bold and jumping right into improving articles.

I just reverted your edit to the hatnote on Life, but I wanted to encourage you to continue diving into edits and try not to be discouraged by the technicalities and policies that come up as you make your first edits. The policies are important, but it's a lot more important that you have fun.

One of the best ways to find articles that need work is to visit a WikiProject and look for tasks listed there.

Enjoy and feel free to reach out on my user talk page if you have questions!

The void century (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not social media (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

You've submitted this for review as a potential article in mainspace, but it looks like you intended it to become a Wikipedia essay. If so, you don't need to go through the Articles for Creation review process.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not social media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AugustusAudax! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Hedwig (disambiguation) has been accepted

Saint Hedwig (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American

Please note that disambiguation pages like American are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not include articles whose title is not easily confused with the disambiguation title; instead add {{in title}} to the See also section

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes

Hi AugustusAudax, I see you've been adding a number of hatnotes to high-profile articles lately. I appreciate your enthusiasm but I've reverted some of these additions and might revert some more. Just like with the above, there's no need to add hatnotes to distinguish articles that are not easily confused; Adam and Atom are sufficiently different that no such hatnote is needed and the same goes for India and Indiana. We don't have to account for any possible confusion a reader might have, just what is actually likely, and these articles especially already have plenty of necessary hatnotes so that adding unnecessary ones makes them take up a lot of space at the top of the article. In addition, there's also no need to add hatnotes for specific articles that are already covered by a general disambiguation page: e.g., Indiana Territory is already included in Indiana (disambiguation), so there's no need for a mention of it in the hatnote. I hope this helps Lennart97 (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blair Hess (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

A single performance under this pseudonym is insufficient to require a redirect.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blair Hess and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: -dom (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing: The very first sentence is -dom has the meaning of, "a suffix denoting a rank, status, or domain." and this is attributed to Merriam-Webster. Being very surprised by the inadequacy of this definition, I took a look at the M-W source. It says no such thing. "What Wikipedia is not"? An article on the same subject was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-dom. Why attempt to re-create it, especially when the draft is an inferior alternative to Wiktionary's version? If an article really is warranted, then use what's said in one or more among (A) R M W Dixon, Making New Words: Morphological Derivation in English (2014); (B) Laurie Bauer, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag, The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology (2013); and (C) Hans Marchand, The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, 2nd ed. (1969).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:-dom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 12:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:-dom has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:-dom. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One additional source providing significant coverage after the initial incident reports would help this draft overcome the barrier of WP:NOTNEWS. The MusicRadar source unfortunately does not contribute to this. If that doesn't work out, consider inserting this as a section on the biography article for Billie Joe Armstrong. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shoplifter (song) (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntientNestor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shoplifter (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shoplifter (song) (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shoplifter (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Abraham seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See WP:RNPOV. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. I was trying to add "Judaism" to religion with a reference, but made a mistake AugustusAudax (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slaewaz (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slaewaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha3031 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No new sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at IHeartRadio Music Festival#2012. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude (talk) 00:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stub-tagging Aglaonema modestum

I noticed that you applied a stub tag to Aglaonema modestum. In general, articles on plants that contain a detailed description of the species are assessed as Start-class. The article's talk page also had it listed as Start. If you have any questions about assessing articles it is best to inquire at Wikiprojects' talk pages. Abductive (reasoning) 03:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blooket (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems to fail WP:GNG. See previous deletion discussions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blooket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blooket

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blooket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blooket. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suicide of Chester Bennington for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suicide of Chester Bennington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Chester Bennington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Heighway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, David Heighway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Love

Hi, Augustus! Thank you very much for this removal. That text had been sitting there since 2019. Bishonen | tålk 20:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adolescent angst (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adolescent angst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagol0929 What sources in particular were unreliable? Sincerely, --AugustusAudax (talk|contribs) P.S: Aliens exist 23:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just think it overall fails WP:GNG and would be deleted at AFD Nagol0929 (talk) 11:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dookie

I belatedly noticed you added ShoutWiki as a source for "She". That is a Wiki and is not reliable material. I would have just put it in an edit summary, but I hit Enter a little before the gun. dannymusiceditor ^oops 17:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcome-1

Template:Welcome-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blair Hess

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blair Hess, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- Yamla (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blair Hess

Hello, AugustusAudax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blair Hess".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Live performance (primary topic)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Live performance (primary topic) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 4 § Live performance (primary topic) until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Slaewaz

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slaewaz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adolescent angst (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is probably a better fit to be merged and/or discussed in a page such as Angst.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adolescent angst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Slaewaz

Hello, AugustusAudax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Slaewaz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident

Hello, AugustusAudax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2012 Green Day iHeartRadio Music Festival incident".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:-dom

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:-dom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Heighway

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Heighway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Macy's Day Parade (song)

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Macy's Day Parade (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:-dom

Hello, AugustusAudax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "-dom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Macy's Day Parade (song)

Hello, AugustusAudax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Macy's Day Parade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcome-turnaround

Template:Welcome-turnaround has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. PleaseStand (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Please note

Template:Please note has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. PleaseStand (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adolescent angst

Hello, AugustusAudax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adolescent angst, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adolescent angst

Hello, AugustusAudax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adolescent angst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Social media sources

Template:Social media sources has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]