User talk:Avamedina16

Possibly unfree File:Sancho Macek.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sancho Macek.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sancho Martin[edit]

The article Sancho Martin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Opencooper (talk) 23:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sancho Martin[edit]

The article Sancho Martin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sancho Martin[edit]

The article Sancho Martin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jackson Dunbar, Esq[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jackson Dunbar, Esq, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 15:40, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jackson Dunbar, Esq[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jackson Dunbar, Esq, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 21:26, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to Contest the speedy deletion, please. Can you please inform me with what's wrong with new page so that I can update it please. Avamedina16 (talk) 21:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted as G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion) and G12 (copyright infringement). Promotion is not acceptable as it is contrary to Wikipedia's purpose, and copyright infringement is not acceptable for legal reasons. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 21:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand. Which part of the page was considered copyright infringement? Avamedina16 (talk) 21:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article contained significant content copied directly from here. Wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously, and persistent violators of copyright will be blocked from editing. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 21:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Dunbar moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jackson Dunbar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 07:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyway that you can please review the edits for publishing in the mainspace? Avamedina16 (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. I do not want to personally advertise, publicize, or promote Jackson Dunbar, Esq. I just felt like he's a notable human being that deserved a Wiki for his contributions to society & for his current book.I've been admiring his work that he's done for the community of Atlanta after listening to him on a podcast because a relative of mine is going through the same chronic pain discrimination. I was inspired & decided to write an article about him on my own. He's not a friend, client, or colleague. I just wanted to create a page for him as a personal Christmas gift from me & email him the link before the holiday to show my appreciation, since I've been a Wiki contributor for some time. Where do we go from here Avamedina16 (talk) 17:58, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Avamedina16. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Jackson Dunbar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:64:7ECA:BC87:9C14:EE34:2337 (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. I do not want to personally advertise, publicize, or promote Jackson Dunbar, Esq. I just felt like he's a notable human being that deserved a Wiki for his contributions to society & for his current book.

I've been admiring his work that he's done for the community of Atlanta after listening to him on a podcast because a relative of mine is going through the same chronic pain discrimination. I was inspired & decided to write an article about him on my own. He's not a friend, client, or colleague. I just wanted to create a page for him as a personal Christmas gift from me & email him the link before the holiday to show my appreciation, since I've been a Wiki contributor for some time. Where do we go from here? Avamedina16 (talk) 17:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, Avamedina16, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as AMwikiedits (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:8D8E:11F:B561:C37B (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackson Dunbar (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jackson Dunbar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Avamedina16! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jackson Dunbar[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jackson Dunbar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]