User talk:Avicennasis/MainArchive/2011Q4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Album cover template migrations
Hi. I noticed you're migrating uses of {{album cover fur}} to {{Non-free use rationale album cover}}. It occurred to me that when one uses the upload form to upload an album cover, it's still preloading {{album cover fur}}. You might want to request that the upload form be changed to use {{Non-free use rationale album cover}} instead. Just an FYI. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Will do - thanks for the heads up!
Avicennasis @ 06:59, 8 Tishrei 5772 / 06:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Banner suggestion
I saw you suggestion regarding the banners at WP:VPT#Banners. Where exactly do I have to place
#centralNotice {display:none !important;}
in order to work? Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- You'd place it in your skins' .css page - Which should be here. Avicennasis @ 13:20, 9 Tishrei 5772 / 13:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Added. Thanks. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Please comment on Talk:Red-Green Alliance (Denmark)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Red-Green Alliance (Denmark). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Bot at zhwikiquote
Hi friend, just to let you know that I have granted bot flag for your request at zhwikiquote. --Ben.MQ (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
FYI
You might be interested in this. —SW— soliloquize 18:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
UAA
Is AvicBot okay? It hasn't made reports at User:Avicennasis/reports/uaa/report for almost a day. --Danger (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not sure. The cronjob might be failing. I just manually ran the script remotely - I'll look into it futher when I get home. Avicennasis @ 23:05, 22 Tishrei 5772 / 23:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
For AvicBot
|
Chips to placate you |
| Oh great robot, please accept this gift of chips and continue performing tasks that my puny meat brain becomes bored while doing. Danger (talk) 03:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC) |
AvicBot2 trial
How is the trial for AvicBot2 going? I looked at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AvicBot2 and there haven't been any updates since 16 October. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- So far, so good. It should be clearing your Signpost page today, a little before midnight, and that should happen roughly every 7 days. Avicennasis @ 22:19, 27 Tishrei 5772 / 22:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- The bot cleared the page without any problems (although another editor reverted that edit by the bot, but that was a good faith mistake). Thank you for all your work on this bot. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 02:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Avicennasis/MainArchive/2011Q4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
Please comment on Talk:Sri Lanka
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sri Lanka. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Full contents of WikiProject Film newsletter?
Hello, you are listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Outreach as preferring the full contents of the latest WikiProject Film newsletter. There has been a transition in newsletter writing and distribution, so I wanted to ask if you still prefer the full contents (which may have been delivered with some inconsistency in the past) or if you are okay with a link to the newsletter page. Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 19:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
You're invited! Wikipedia Loves Libraries DC
| Wikipedia Loves Libraries DC & edit-a-thon | |
|---|---|
 Wikipedia Loves Libraries comes to DC on Saturday, November 5th, from 1-5pm, at the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial Library. We will be holding an edit-a-thon, working together to improve Wikipedia content related to DC history, arts, civil rights, or whatever suits your interests. There may also be opportunities to help with scanning historic photos plus some swag! You're invited and we hope to see you there! | |
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC), on behalf of User:Aude
 | |||||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 • Fall 2011 • About the Newsletter | |||||
|
|
Project reports for
| |||
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | |||||
Bot malfunctioning
Your bot seems to be adding {{orphan}} tags to categories [1]. I don't think that's intended? —Ruud 12:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Correct. I've reverted the errors - I will stop and fix the script later today. Thanks for the heads up, good block. Avicennasis @ 13:38, 4 Cheshvan 5772 / 13:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Okay. I've unblocked your bot account. Cheers, —Ruud 16:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Today at 19:31 UTC your bot still added {{orphan}} to this file description page. That also doesn't make much sense.
- Looking at Special:Contributions/AvicBot, I see that was no isolated mistake. Please test your bot more thoroughly and do supervised runs first. And please clean up after that bot. Lupo 20:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed - the bot is not supposed to run this script outside articlespace. The filter that was supposed to remove all non-mainspace pages from the runlist failed - I have already found the cause and fixed it. I'll be cleaning the bot's run currently. Again, sorry - and this shouldn't happen again. Avicennasis @ 20:59, 4 Cheshvan 5772 / 20:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
Fixing double redirects
Hey, AvicBot should delay a little while before fixing double redirects, to prevent problems like this, and also to stop problems relating to page move vandalism. Redirect fixer, which also worked at the rate of knots, was disabled for a very good reason. Fixing double redirects is not an urgent issue ... I would delay it for half an hour from the time that the page was moved, at the very least. Graham87 01:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this would be practical to code - and I believe that none of the other redirect-fixing bots have such a delay. The issue is that it's hard to find the edit the causes the problem. I will look into re-coding the bot soon, however, and attempt to address this issue. Avicennasis @ 01:41, 23 Cheshvan 5772 / 01:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Avicennasis I Just want to appreciate the edits you made for the article Alfonso G. Pablo Sr.; I wish I could do some of those things.Greferjun (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Hello, Avicennasis. I notice you recently made a tag, combining multiple "issues" on the page for American Club (eikaiwa). I was wondering if you read the article and went through its references. Though tags for references and COI may have been relevant in the past, they don't seem relevant now. It seems if one were to go through the references and re-write the article from scratch, it would probably turn out pretty much the same as it is now (though one would have to be able to read Japanese, since many of the references are published in Japanese). Any thoughts? Thank you very much for your time and input! Minusminority (talk) 04:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- I use some scripts to suggest edits - this is one of them. I don't really have an opinion on the tags themselves - but if you feel they no longer apply, feel free to remove them. Avicennasis @ 01:41, 23 Cheshvan 5772 / 01:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for your reply. Actually, another editor removed the tag shortly after you made the edit...Anyway, thanks for your work...Minusminority (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Future of the US Education Program and the Ambassador Project
There is a discussion about the future and the growth of the US education program along with the future of the Wikipedia Ambassador Project here. Voceditenore (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Isaac Clarke
Stop redirecting the page to Dead Space (series)! My page has perfect references and correct information. Do not do this agian because I have the text edit saved, so if you do it again, I will re paste. User:NackFinch Nov 18, 2011. —Preceding undated comment added 23:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC).
- The bot is only fixing double redirects - it is working as it's supposed to. Avicennasis @ 01:41, 23 Cheshvan 5772 / 01:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:11, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26!
| Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
|---|---|
 |
FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
multiple issues merging
see the error XD. Regards, mabdul 20:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Weird.
Didn't expect that one! I'll try to code around that - thanks! Avicennasis @ 22:02, 5 Kislev 5772 / 22:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
AvicBot moving tags above hatnotes
Hi,
Thanks for this bot: much needed! I note though that it's moving merged tags to the top of articles, above {{other uses}} and presumably other hatnotes: [2] Is this a known bug? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:16, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yep. I've been trying to re-work the code to avoid this - Hopefully I'll get a patch in soon. Avicennasis @ 15:30, 7 Kislev 5772 / 15:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
Multiple issues box and the Catscan tool.
In the MA Project, many people use the Catscan tool to search for articles with notability problems. The Catscan tool does not find tags inside the Multiple issues box. It would be nice if the Catscan tool were improved but in the between time, it is convenient to have the Notability tag outside the Multiple issues box. It is a balance between user needs and tools needs. Thanks! jmcw (talk) 08:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. Can you post an example of the search parameters you use in the Catscan tool, so I can generate a filter list for AvicBot? Avicennasis @ 02:52, 15 Kislev 5772 / 02:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this! [4] would be typical, with the depth going to level 6. jmcw (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 18:08, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Longford Trust Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:The Longford Trust Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Bot error
Hi Avicennasis. It would appear your bot, AvicBot, has made an error when converting issue templates to the {{multiple issues}} template (diff): as a replacement for the {{too detailed}} template, it used over detailed, which is a non-existent parameter. Instead, I believe it should have used overly detailed, as this appears to be the corresponding "multiple issues" parameter. Thank you, Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 03:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, it seems it was an error; however, I have now fixed it. Thanks for bringing this to my attention! Avicennasis @ 04:00, 13 Kislev 5772 / 04:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Avicennasis. For me, your bot, AvicBot, has an irritating habit of discarding the "attempted de-orphan" information when it merges the template into a multiple issues template. This has three unfortunate effects: one is the loss of information (it no longer remembers that someone has subsequently had a go at resolving the issues, and when); the second is that the multiple issues template doesn't give the same access as the orphan template does to "Related articles" and "suggestions may be available" links; but, most importantly, is means that the page gets listed again on the Orphan articles page for the date when the Orphan template was originally added, which then gets in the way of editors who are trying to work through the Wikipedia backlog of orphaned articles. For the present, I have been resorting to separating off the orphan template again from the multiple issues template (and restoring the old "att=" date). However, I thought I had better contact you, to see if there is a better compromise. (I think there is a "do-attempt" field that I could use, which might answer my third (and most important) concern, above (I've not tried it out yet). What do you think? TheAMmollusc (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like a reasonable request - I'll look over the {{multiple issues}} template params and try to modify the script to retain this info. In the meantime, I'm stopped the grouping script. Avicennasis @ 02:48, 15 Kislev 5772 / 02:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like a reasonable request - I'll look over the {{multiple issues}} template params and try to modify the script to retain this info. In the meantime, I'm stopped the grouping script.
- Hi Avicennasis. For me, your bot, AvicBot, has an irritating habit of discarding the "attempted de-orphan" information when it merges the template into a multiple issues template. This has three unfortunate effects: one is the loss of information (it no longer remembers that someone has subsequently had a go at resolving the issues, and when); the second is that the multiple issues template doesn't give the same access as the orphan template does to "Related articles" and "suggestions may be available" links; but, most importantly, is means that the page gets listed again on the Orphan articles page for the date when the Orphan template was originally added, which then gets in the way of editors who are trying to work through the Wikipedia backlog of orphaned articles. For the present, I have been resorting to separating off the orphan template again from the multiple issues template (and restoring the old "att=" date). However, I thought I had better contact you, to see if there is a better compromise. (I think there is a "do-attempt" field that I could use, which might answer my third (and most important) concern, above (I've not tried it out yet). What do you think? TheAMmollusc (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Senkaku Islands
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Senkaku Islands. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin Sargeant
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Benjamin Sargeant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Στc. 01:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oops. Bad AWB settings - sorry! Thanks for cleaning up my goof, though! Avicennasis @ 02:34, 15 Kislev 5772 / 02:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Your user page...
...looks as crappy as my room :) It's lovely to see you around Avi. Merry Christmas. Wifione Message 18:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- And to you as well. Happy holidays! Avicennasis @ 14:28, 28 Kislev 5772 / 14:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
WP Martial Arts Project
Hello, you appear to have added the WPMA banner to a page that already had it. You might want to check for "Martialartsproject" as well as "WikiProject Martial arts." Trust this note helps. Janggeom (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Adding "Template category" to Inmediate childrens
Hello Avicennasis! I'm Theklan from the Basque Wikipedia. I've been working in the creation of the automatic taxobox as I think it's very useful for small Wikipedias. Furthermore, with the help of some bots I make template import so we can hold all the taxonomy information made in English. Well, as you will know when this taxonomy templates are created automatically we get something like this: Category:Immediate_step-children/Anthocerotophyta, in our case we get it in basque language: eu:Kategoria:Zuzeneko_alabaordeak/Muroidea. I've seen that you insert a template called Template category. So I have two questions:
- Could you explain me WHY you insert this template?
- Could you explain me HOW you insert this template? (As I think that you make it with the help of a bot).
Thanks for all! -Theklan (talk) 14:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sure thing! I create the categories as I find them - else they tend to clutter up Special:WantedCategories - and having redlinked categories everywhere isn't really 'neat', in my opinion. I use a program called TypeItIn for a this (and many other) task(s) on Wikipedia. It helps to automate some of the editing - though it's not a bot, and all edits are manually saved after I check them. You could easily get AutoWikiBrowser to perform the same function, though. Hope that helps! Let me know if you need any more info/assistance. Avicennasis @ 15:47, 2 Tevet 5772 / 15:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Thanksgiving
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thanksgiving. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |