User talk:BVECJordan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, BVECJordan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need what more details needs to be added, there is even not needed of covering a depth details about the college information.
Moreover it's just a simple COLLEGE annd not even famous
All information are being cited properly.
If u don't wanna accept then
I just don't care delete the drafts if u want.
As your wish it's not my problem.. BVECJordan (talk) 10:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


April 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bongaigaon College have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BVECJordan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unreferenced, with no evidence of notability, and no context.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kalamati[edit]

Hello, the article Kalamati lacks references clearly showing notability.

Proposed deletion of Kalamati[edit]

Notice

The article Kalamati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A picnic location for tourists. Fails GNG and NGEO. Sources in the article are promotions typical of a tourist spot.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  08:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Bijni-logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bijni-logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Barak Valley Engineering College
added links pointing to Industry, Club and Canteen
Chirang district
added a link pointing to Chirang

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Basugaon College[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Basugaon College, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance tags without fixing the problems[edit]

For example, you removed {{unsourced}} from Kajalgaon even though it still has 0 source, and removed {{uncategorized}} from Patabari Fv even though it has 0 category. Aithus (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay sir thank you so much for your suggestion. I will note it from next time
Since i am a beginner
I do hope to learn a lot from you sir.
Thank you sir BVECJordan (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bengtol College
added links pointing to University Grants Commission and Bodo
Chirang district
added a link pointing to Boro
Kalamati
added a link pointing to Boro

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upendra Nath Brahma College moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Upendra Nath Brahma College,is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 09:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir for suggesting The article page is about new college sir
What is wrong with my new creation? and i have cited a citations also.
Please correct me ☺️ sir because I'm a beginner BVECJordan (talk) 20:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upendra Nath Brahma College (May 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
okay
What is the reason
Everything has been cited as far as needed
What damn reason do i need to be added again
Why my page has been moved to dreaftspace.
Damn this is so frustrating
I can't listen anymore
There was nothing wrong with it. BVECJordan (talk) 06:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the details as far as source and relaible BVECJordan (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patabari Fv moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Patabari Fv, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What the damn is wrong with this page ??
Why do u always move to draftspace
All are being cited from realiable source
What more it needs.
Damn ur most bullshit... BVECJordan (talk) 01:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bengtol
added links pointing to Nepali, Bengali and Boro
Assam Science and Technology University
added a link pointing to University Grants Commission

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Upendra Nath Brahma College[edit]

Information icon Hello, BVECJordan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Upendra Nath Brahma College, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upendra Nath Brahma College (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amteka F.V moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Amteka F.V. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and no content and no categories. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saralpara F.V moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Saralpara F.V. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

offcourae iam going to edit BVECJordan (talk) 12:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saralpara F.V (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Your job is to prove that it passes WP:GEOLAND
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why damn the bullshit need again wp geoland
It's already a citiable and citations has been cited properly 2409:40E6:E:44F7:443E:61FF:FE57:86D (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion[edit]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 17:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir so much for suggestion.
Please help me to learn I am a beginner.
I do hope learning something new from you.
Appreciate it BVECJordan (talk) 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mwnabili Picnic spot & Eco Tourism moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mwnabili Picnic spot & Eco Tourism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what more citation do we need for this creations .there is not much more information for this pace and yet ur moving to drafspace .this is bullshit BVECJordan (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwnabili (November 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok sir I will note that 2409:40E6:39:D52E:F4CD:C3FF:FE26:633B (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwnabili (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Going to need a bit better sourcing, because "spectacular" is not written from a neutral point of view.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 03:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fine BVECJordan (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwnabili (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why the dam bullshit every time you reject all the times.
I'm reaching my limit okay
It's just a small place what damn we nee again for more articles BVECJordan (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please mind your language. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What mind your language BVECJordan (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have approached to senior or experienced writer for help but none of them help me or reply how to write and cite citation more property .
All the just doing for their personal satisfy ony.
Always rejecting, always declining.
Instead tell ànd teach us what should we do to write.
Not just handky reply BVECJordan (talk) 15:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If u decline one more time I have nothing to say but delete the article BVECJordan (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwnabili (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwnabili (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"Tourist attraction place" is not a recognised geographical feature, therefore this probably needs to be reframed or else satisfy WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwnabili (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Tedious re-submissions with no improvement just wasting everyone's times
KylieTastic (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh shit ur the worst new page review 2409:40E6:3F:372:E069:37FF:FED8:9D0E (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh shit what is wrong again BVECJordan (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kokrajhar Medical College and Hospital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NMC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is there any problem with that? BVECJordan (talk) 08:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mwnabili has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mwnabili. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
U too are garbage of a...s. BVECJordan (talk) 08:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Mwnabili, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir okay.
I apologise for my harsh behaviour for today and I am willing to correct it
And please accept my humble apology..🙏 BVECJordan (talk) 11:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bhairabkunda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok
Thank you
Hope to learn better from you BVECJordan (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upendra Nath Brahma College (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoglophie was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
zoglophie•talk• 17:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok sir thank you for you review
i will try to improve the articles and citations BVECJordan (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upendra Nath Brahma College (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 02:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok sir i will improve the articles with realible source BVECJordan (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Edinburg, New York, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners if you are unsure on how to properly make citations. ✦•┈๑⋅⋯𝓜𝒆𝗿𝗿𝛄 𝓒𝒉𝗿𝖏𝙨𝙩𝒎𝝰𝙨⋯⋅๑┈•✦ Isaidnoway (talk) 17:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for your kind suggestion 2409:40E6:18:21E3:785A:53FF:FE78:7DD9 (talk) 18:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don Bosco College, Chapaguri moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Don Bosco College, Chapaguri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NSCHOOL. Cheers Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
well i appreciate it
May i know the reason why you moved to draftspace.
As it was all reliable sources already BVECJordan (talk) 06:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails WP:GNG. If you check WP:NSCHOOL, All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both.
The first 2 are primary sources and do not count towards notability. 3rd is a listing. 4th ref has only images. To get more clarity, you can see WP:THREE. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
well sir thank you
I appreciate it for ur kind suggestion
I'm gonna improve the article and add reliable sources
Help me out as I am far more to go and would be glad to learn from you. BVECJordan (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it will be possible to improve this article now. If I am right, the college was inaugurated today/yesterday and will not have enough sources to establish notability at this point. Cheers Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok sir sure
Appreciate it BVECJordan (talk) 07:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amteka F.V[edit]

Information icon Hello, BVECJordan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amteka F.V, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saralpara F.V[edit]

Information icon Hello, BVECJordan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saralpara F.V, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mwnabili[edit]

Information icon Hello, BVECJordan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mwnabili, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BVECJordan&oldid=1221946592"