User talk:Bananabhai

Welcome![edit]

Welcome, Bananabhai!

Hello, Bananabhai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 17:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC) [reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sooryavanshi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Reliable source says 160 crore budget. So do not change it. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at RRR (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bachchhan Paandey, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 01:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Annaatthe. - Arjayay (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Namma Veettu Pillai. - Arjayay (talk) 10:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Beast (2022 film). Ab207 (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beast (2022 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kaathuvaakula Rendu Kaadhal. - Arjayay (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Don (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to stop. You have been repeatedly warned and even blocked over this behavior. As far as I can tell you have not responded to any of the messages left on your talk page. If it becomes necessary to address this problem again, your next block will be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A limited-duration block after a failed block and nine warnings on an account with 100 edits. Okay. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Don (2022 film). – NJD-DE (talk) 18:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]