User talk:Bardigang
April 2018
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Drip (song), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Per WP:BRD when your edit has been undone you should discuss the edit on the talk page rather than restoring it. Meters (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
User:Meters please see Talk:Invasion of Privacy (album) where it has already been discussed - several users have reverted Hayman's edits as he is spreading false info thus he is the disruptive editor in this case, not me. Bardigang (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Bardigang, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Bardigang! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/WP_teahouse_logo_3.png/40px-WP_teahouse_logo_3.png)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
April 2018
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Be Careful (Cardi B song). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]![]() |
Hi Bardigang! You created a thread called Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]![]() |
Hi Bardigang! You created a thread called Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |