User talk:Barqnbyte

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barqnbyte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dianna wrongly associates me with a banned user and it is clear that it was done solely because I edited this hotly contested page. Run an IP check and tell me if this ever came up - There is nothing to link me and even more, the edits made were meant to be helpful as to the critique of the page as noted in the tags. This is unfair. How can anyone make changes to enhance and improve if it receives this treatment? Maybe the admin who blocked me might want to look over the edits and see rather than simply ignoring the edit and blocking. The article in question for Ron Torossian needs some help and the only help it gets is from those who are seeking to have tagged as non-notable. I added several pieces to show notability and took out a redundancy in the listing of 5W Public Relations revenues, but there seemed to be no due process, just ignore and revert. Barqnbyte (talk)

Decline reason:

I don't know why you are so sure that Diannaa blocked you purely on the basis that you edited a particular page, nor why, if that be so, Diannaa has not blocked all the editors who have edited that page. However, I have found much more evidence than just that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dianna wrongly associates me with a banned user and it is clear that it was done solely because I edited this hotly contested page. Run an IP check and tell me if this ever came up - There is nothing to link me and even more, the edits made were meant to be helpful as to the critique of the page as noted in the tags. This is unfair. How can anyone make changes to enhance and improve if it receives this treatment? Maybe the admin who blocked me might want to look over the edits and see rather than simply ignoring the edit and blocking. The article in question for Ron Torossian needs some help and the only help it gets is from those who are seeking to have tagged as non-notable. I added several pieces to show notability and took out a redundancy in the listing of 5W Public Relations revenues, but there seemed to be no due process, just ignore and revert. Barqnbyte (talk)