User talk:BarrySpinno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to English land law, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think there was any such notice there! Just transferred some text to a more appropriate page on land law. BarrySpinno (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to English land law, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was moved to the land law page - rather than deleted. Hope that makes sense. BarrySpinno (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to British Airways plc v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 01:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google LLC v Commission moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Google LLC v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 01:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Commercial Solvents Corporation v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 01:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AstraZeneca plc v Commission moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to AstraZeneca plc v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AKZO Chemie BV v Commission moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to AKZO Chemie BV v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest, @User:Seawolf35 and @User:CycloneYoris - but the pages are referenced - check out case citation to understand the references for law articles. I've also put in a book for you. Hope that helps for the future. BarrySpinno (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! BarrySpinno, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Maylingoed. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Australian labour law—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 04:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're referring to, but I'm updating the whole page. Do give suggestions if you have any for what you'd like to see. BarrySpinno (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 22:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 17:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Australian labour law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boards. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to British Airways plc v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creepTalk 16:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. scope_creepTalk 16:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BarrySpinno: Please, Just ignore this. I thought because the article was single reference, it wasn't viable, and took the thing to the wrong. Just ignore. I must have half sleeping. scope_creepTalk 20:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, BarrySpinno. Thank you for your work on AstraZeneca plc v Commission. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs more secondary sources and explanatory material derived from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, BarrySpinno. Thank you for your work on Google LLC v Commission. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs secondary sources and material derived from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uk public[edit]

Hello BarrySpinno,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uk public for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Uk public to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Remsense 05:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Uk public has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12 § Uk public until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mercedes and Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Oz lab has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Oz lab until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Oz labour has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Oz labour until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Merger Regulation 2004 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Merger Regulation 2004 until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S curve.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]