User talk:Batong1930

Hello, Batong1930, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 02:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Addition of false information to multiple articles

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

In this edit, you falsely added Maryland, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Minnesota as states that Bush was the only Republican to win reelection without, which is not true. And in this edit, you falsely claimed that the electoral votes were counted on January 8 in 2004 (they were counted on the 6th, as always). Please fact check your edits before submitting, or seek help on the talk page. Best, Cpotisch (talk) 06:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of presidents of the United States

Howdy. Would you please get a consensus for images changes at List of presidents of the United States's talkpage. Rather then boldly making such changes. GoodDay (talk) 01:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of presidents of the United States. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 02:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE.... bring your proposed changes to the talkpages of those articles, instead of slow edit-warring. GoodDay (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as GoodDay requests, you really should go to the talk page of those articles and discuss any changes you wish to make. There is actually a policy that states "Communication is Required", meaning that if you to continue making edits to those pages, you do not have the option of ignoring other editors. Your editing is reaching the point of being disruptive. (Perhaps an admin might even find you are now past that point which will result in sanctions.)

You've already been warned, yet you continue, leaving other editors very little choice but to report you, and leaving an admin very little choice but to block you. - wolf 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

f**k you Batong1930 (talk) 05:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, well this will be very useful, since you can't seem to stop edit-warring or start discussing, it won't be long until you're reported to one admin board or another, and this will show that you're not just a newbie struggling with the rules or having problems with ESL, but a wilfully disruptive user. I will be sure to add your... charming reply to that report to confirm just that. Have a nice day - wolf 07:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop Your disruptive editing on List of presidents of the United States and List of vice presidents of the United States. As has been said by others, "Communication is Required"; it is imperative you to go to the talk page of these articles and discuss any changes you wish to make. Drdpw (talk) 02:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The convention was held in 1835, not 1836

Howdy. The Democratic Party held its convention to nominate candidates for the 1836 presidential election, in May 1835. So, please don't re-name the convention page 'or' rename links to it. GoodDay (talk) 01:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Johnnie Bob. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 00:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 00:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Presidency of Barack Obama

Template:Presidency of Barack Obama has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Presidency of Bill Clinton

Template:Presidency of Bill Clinton has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message to Batong1930

Please don't add unnecessary pipes to links, per WP:NOTBROKEN. Remsense ‥ 论 23:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George W. Bush. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 01:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fuck you Batong1930 (talk) 01:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at September 11 attacks, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 01:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Remsense ‥ 论 01:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Remsense ‥ 论 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 03:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biden & Harris

I understand what you're trying to do, concerning the succession boxes at Biden & Harris. But, it breaks the functionality of them. Best to wait, until inauguration day. GoodDay (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]