User talk:Benrudd7478

Welcome!

Hello, Benrudd7478, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Nantucket have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. User:HopsonRoad 20:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nantucket – Cape Cod

Hi Benrudd, I note that you assert that Nantucket is 30 mi. from Cape Cod in some of your edits. As you are new to Wikipedia, you may be unfamiliar with the requirement to cite WP:Reliable sources, i.e. some published source that substantiates what's written in WP. A simple measurement in Google Earth demonstrates that the distance from points along the shore from Harwich to Hyannis are about 18 miles to the National Wildlife Refuge on the norther tip of the island. Let's find a cited distance, e.g. the ferry route from Hyannis to Nantucket Town, and use that. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 21:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dylan Fernandes

The article Dylan Fernandes has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ɯɐɔ 💬 16:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Local elections in Nantucket

Hi Benrudd, I notice that you made some unreferenced good-faith additions of local election results at Nantucket. I just wanted to give you the courtesy of a fuller explanation why I reverted those additions. The primary reason is that local elections for selectboard, etc. typically don't qualify under Wikipedia:Notability (events). As a selectboard member in my community, my election does not rise to the level of being notable to a reader of Wikipedia. Look also at some major jurisdictions, like Boston. There the type of government is noted and the mayor's name is mentioned, but elections to the city council are not included in the article. Remember also that a Mayor is typically a much more powerful figure than a selectboard chair. The former manages the municipality; the latter runs the meetings of the public body and may represent its actions to the public. If you feel that this perspective is incorrect, let's discuss it at Talk:Nantucket, where other editors can offer their perspectives. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 12:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Barrett (Massachusetts Politician)

The article John Barrett (Massachusetts Politician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Iffy★Chat -- 14:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Benrudd 7478. You and I have had a couple of edit conflicts now, and in the last one you reverted my text edits and my removal of now-inapplicable tags on this article, so please let me know when you're finished editing the article so we won't continue to conflict. Among other tasks, the title of the article needs to be changed to John Barrett (Massachusetts politician) per WP:NCCAPS, the text of the article could be expanded, and the format would benefit from some tweaks. Thanks, --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve William L. Crocker, Jr.

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Benrudd7478, thanks for creating William L. Crocker, Jr.!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:US House 239-195 (1V).svg

Thanks for uploading File:US House 239-195 (1V).svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

116th US Congress

Howdy. What exactly are you trying to do at 116th United States Congress? The number right now is 234 Democrats to 200 Republicans, with 1 to b determined. GoodDay (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Current number is 239-195 according to NY times

NY times is incorrect. GoodDay (talk) 19:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Christopher Hendricks) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Christopher Hendricks.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please be aware of creating dabs - e.g. there are multiple meanings of Acushnet and Democratic

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Edwin Rudd, from its old location at User:Benrudd7478/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Rudd (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sam-2727 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'd say that extremely local coverage doesn't indicate notability. Also, try to clean up the language so it's written in a neutral tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edwin Rudd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edwin Rudd, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 (talk) 23:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Benrudd7478! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sam-2727 (talk) 23:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edwin Rudd

Hello, Benrudd7478. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edwin Rudd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]