User talk:BhamBoi/Archive 1

June 2022

Hello, I'm Nightenbelle. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to British Indian Ocean Territory—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

How so? I'm pretty sure the info was objective. I just changed the capital because the page for Camp Thunder Cove itself does not mention capital or administrative functions anywhere. BhamBoi (talk) 18:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Redirects

Hi BhamBoi, would you like me to batch-delete your recently-created redirects to Mount Lkest? The answer can be no if you'd like to keep manually tagging, but I thought I'd offer in case you wanted to save some time. DanCherek (talk) 05:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

They were created with a script, but I uploaded from the wrong file that had more redirects than I thought were necessary after creation, so I have been removing the ones that don't really work.

The thing is, I have only been deleting the ones that are XX Mount/Mt or Mountain/Mtn XX because it is really uncommon to have that word order. If you do see any more with the weird suffix/prefix swapped word order, it would really help me out if you could delete them. Thanks! BhamBoi (talk) 05:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

So, I have been keeping ones that are Mount/Mt XX and XX Mountain/Mtn and I would appreciate your help in getting rid of the odd ones. BhamBoi (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Alright, I deleted 46 more redirects that I think were in the form of XX Mount/Mt. DanCherek (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I try to not cause a headache for either of us again. Cheers! BhamBoi (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Mass Redirects

Hey BhamBoi, I appreciate your effort to contribute to Wikipedia. With that said, I think you're going overboard on the amount of redirects you're creating for various subjects. Yes, technically some of them can be misspelling, but they're not all necessarily likely. I guess what I'm saying is that you don't necessarily have to be as thought as you're seemingly trying to be. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Zelenograd

Moved from User talk:Alex Spade

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zelenograd&diff=1122869884&oldid=1122820749 you reverted my edit of adding Zelenograd to a Moscow category under the basis that it is not a part of Moscow, but it most definitely is. It’s in both the first sentence and the short description of the Zelenograd article. Why did you remove it? BhamBoi (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

It's even in the Infobox: Federal Subject: Moscow BhamBoi (talk) 02:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

MO is short name for Moscow Oblast, not for Moscow. Zelenograd is part of Moscow indeed, but both Moscow and Zelenograd are not parts of Moscow Oblast. Alex Spade (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, thanks. Didn’t realize they weren’t the same thing… oops BhamBoi (talk) 06:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christ the Protector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encantado. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York Post, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligencer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Note: Fixed!  Updated BhamBoi (talk) 06:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Split View Mountain Lodge has been accepted

Split View Mountain Lodge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! This was the first article I’d written by myself so I chose to go through AfC even though I have a sufficient edit count, and I appreciate your quick review. BhamBoi (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Redirects from alternate capitalizations

Please note that creating redirects from alternate capitalizations such as VeraCruz VeraCruz is not necessary because Wikipedia's search function automatically redirects readers to alternate capitalizations if no page exists. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I have realized this pretty recently, but this batch was from a while back. I haven’t made any more like that in a while since I’ve realized that, but those were from before I noted that. Thanks again for the reminder. BhamBoi (talk) 04:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Carus Chemical fire (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Carus Chemical fire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, BhamBoi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BhamBoi. Thank you for your work on Belyounech. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating the article. I hope you will create more articles in the future! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Bellingham, Washington

Please note that a persistent vandal has been adding less-than-notable newspapers here in the past, so notability has to be carefully enforced. Chamber of commerce listings are not a valid secondary RS. Neither WhatcomWatch nor WhatcomTalk seem to be notable enough to be listed based on a search of their mentions in regional newspapers or other established news sources. SounderBruce 01:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

What do you think of adding this paragraph?

There are multiple news outlets associated with Western Washington University, including The Front (formerly The Western Front), Western’s official newspaper covering city-wide news, Western Today, a source for official campus news operated by the Office of University Communications, Window: The Magazine of Western Washington University (usually just Window Magazine or simply Window) a magazine published two to three times a year by the university. It won multiple silver and bronze CASE Circle of Excellence awards in 2019. Klipsun is a quarterly student magazine.

References

BhamBoi (talk) 02:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Okay. Only one of those was added by me, but I thought it would be nice to include both. Thanks for your response, I see now. BhamBoi (talk) 01:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Probably excessive for the city article, but fine for the university's article. The section is meant to be a summary of what media outlets are generally used by local residents, and I don't think a quarterly magazine or the campus news website are a high priority. The sources used are also still too closely associated with the subject. SounderBruce 02:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your IP edits

Hello, I stumbled across your user page and noticed User:BhamBoi/ip edits log. It's fine if you want to note them for the sake of transparency, but I wanted to make sure you know that for privacy reasons, you are under no obligation to disclose edits you have accidentally made while logged out and in fact could request to have the IP addresses oversighted if you wanted. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 12:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Kevin M. Scott

In case you didn't see this, I have published the article to mainspace. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

The deleted article from 15 years ago was about a completely different Kevin. Have a great day! -- Y not? 01:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes I noticed, and thank you! It was ready, I was just holding it in draft space until I knew there were no issues. Cheers! BhamBoi (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add your comments on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions

Hi, noticed that you had left comments on WP:RMC for individual discussions. There is an automated process that updates the page with just the nomination statements of each move request, and thus your comments have been overwritten and are not transferred to the individual discussions. Do add your comments to the discussions by clicking on the 'Discuss' link that is prepended at each nomination statement. – robertsky (talk) 05:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh no! Didn't realize those didn't go through to the main discussions, thanks for the heads up. BhamBoi (talk) 05:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

"Storyful." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Storyful. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 9 § Storyful. until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Educators from Bellingham, Washington

A tag has been placed on Category:Educators from Bellingham, Washington indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Academics from Bellingham, Washington

A tag has been placed on Category:Academics from Bellingham, Washington indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scientists from Bellingham, Washington

A tag has been placed on Category:Scientists from Bellingham, Washington indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. The message said something along the lines of "if this category is no longer, empty, remove this tag" and as I populated it with multiple pages from Western Washington University Faculty, I thought it would be okay to remove the tag. BhamBoi (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi yes, update to my above comment: the text said "If you know of pages which are appropriate for this category, please populate it and remove this notice," and populate it I did. Why then, was it wrong to remove the tag? Thanks BhamBoi (talk) 03:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 fires in the United States

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 fires in the United States indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Tool for adding incoming links

Hi BhamBoi! You may find WP:FINDLINK a useful tool when you're adding incoming links to new articles in the future. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 16:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Guinea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WWF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, BhamBoi. I see you have been writing interesting biographies of women, including the detailed Judy Fierstein. If you intend to continue along the same lines, you might be interested in becoming a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap on Wikipedia. If you would like to join, you can sign up under "New Registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hi BhamBoi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Judy Fierstein that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Oh, I see now. That must have been an accident, as I understand the difference. Thanks for letting me know! BhamBoi (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

IPBE request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BhamBoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to request to be IP Block Exempted. IPBE states I can use this template to request. Every time I try to edit from my phone on Safari, I can’t because of Private Relay. It is really inconvenient to switch to another browser every time I want to edit on mobile, and I am in good standing and have a constructive edit record. From IPEC: "the editor agrees never to misuse the exemption to edit through a blocked anonymizing proxy (this may be checked)" I agree, I only want to edit from mobile without switching from my main browser, as I enjoy the privacy benefits from Private Relay. From IPEC: Who may request: A user affected by an IP address block that is unrelated to their editing and that prevents them editing with a logged-in account. This describes my issue. Thanks!

Decline reason:

I could grant you IPBE this way, but ... the accepted procedure for this now is that you go to WP:IPECPROXY and formally request it via the procedures there (you can do this through email). — Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Daniel Case: If you are an Admin, could you edit the nutshell on the WP:IPBE page? Thanks for your response! BhamBoi (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

I don't see why the "in a nutshell" box would need changing: Apple Private Relay is an anonymising proxy, and both the full policy and the summary direct such requests to the CheckUser queue. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

The part about using the unblock template to request… Or can you still do that for other IPBEs? BhamBoi (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

For "regular" IPBE, that's still a viable option in some cases, although WP:IPEC technically instructs users to use WP:UTRS instead. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Please don't create useless redirects that should be articles

Hi BhamBoi, I notice I'm not the first one to complain about redirects you made. Pretty please, don't create redirects like Culture of Yugoslavia/Yugoslavian culture, Religion of Yugoslavia/Yugoslavian religion, Society of Yugoslavia/Yugoslavian society, and any future such redirects that, first of all, redirect to no specific section touching on the topic on article Yugoslavia, so they're completely useless. Such redirects deceive both readers (that will expect to read something about each subject) and editors (that articles on these subjects already exist). I'll be nominating these for deletion later, to see whether you create more of them. –Vipz (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Okay, noted. I can redirect them to more applicable sections and tag them as "with possibilities" if you'd like. I figured it'd be fine as there are existing redirects for the similar History, Government, People, Politics, and Demographics of Yugoslavia but I guess these were too much. I can request deletion by author if you really think they should go. BhamBoi (talk) 04:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested deletion of all but Religion, which I moved to #Demographics and tagged for possibilities. @Vipz do you think I should request those two be deleted or let them stay as-is? BhamBoi (talk) 04:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@BhamBoi: thank you for being considerate and sorry if the request was kind of confrontational on the outlook. Government of Yugoslavia and Politics of Yugoslavia have identical problems. Most of these have no section on article Yugoslavia to redirect to at the moment. While History of Yugoslavia also doesn't, it is required to still exist to preserve attribution after a merge. #Demographics section as a target for Religion of Yugoslavia is a borderline case in my opinion, and I'd rather have these deleted too (with intention to have full articles at some point in the future, as indicated by red links on my userpage), but feel free to judge yourself. –Vipz (talk) 04:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I'll request them. If need be, someone else uninvolved can swoop back in and recreate if they deem them useful. BhamBoi (talk) 04:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stevenson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elizabeth Stevenson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on James Carrick Moore

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page James Carrick Moore, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BhamBoi. Thank you for your work on Ruth Fremson. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Thanks! I appreciate the kind feedback! BhamBoi (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Chantal Da Silva moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chantal Da Silva, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe, and currently doesn't have any, as all appear to be primary or unreliable sources. Facebook should never be used as a source. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Yeah… I really tried with that one, but I was not very proud of my work after I had published it. I really do think she's notable for her journalism work, but sources are hard to come by. The incoming links should show the amount of times her news is cited, but that doesn't confer notability by itself. BhamBoi (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BhamBoi. Thank you for your work on Mark Girolami. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article. You know what helps on articles on academics, is if you add a link to their Google Scholar profile, such as Girolami's.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

It should have been included in the authority control. BhamBoi (talk) 15:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Ken Hon is an excellent page. Good job! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much! My first Barnstar! I'm glad my wiki-writing activities are being noticed. Cheers to you! BhamBoi (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruy Finch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hawaii National Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 LaSalle chemical plant fire has been accepted

2023 LaSalle chemical plant fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

aaronneallucas (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Grace Wang (academic) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grace Wang (academic). Thanks! Marshelec (talk) 08:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I have a reply to some of your comments:

Social media should not be used as sources.

• Per WP:FACEBOOK, it can be used as a "self-published, primary source," which the link used fits.

The year of birth/age in the infobox (from an age as at date template) must be supported by an inline citation.

• I will add a ref tag to the age at date field.

Finally, it is not clear to me that the current version of the draft article demonstrates how the subject meets the high expectations for notability of academics set out in WP:NPROF...

• I think it's borderline. A tenured Full Prof. does not in itself confer notability, but shows that the university sees some value in her work. NPROF 7a states "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark." Being quoted in PBS NewsHour is definitely not "local news media" and being quoted as an expert in high-quality national news is definitely an honor, but it's among the only news quotations I found.

BhamBoi (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Cited her age at date. BhamBoi (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chantal Da Silva has been accepted

Chantal Da Silva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Detroit Urban Survival Training has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Detroit Urban Survival Training. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Wang (academic) (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Wang (academic) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 02:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, BhamBoi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 02:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ages of consent in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crosscut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

University of Twente Pure BIB (identifier)

Hello! I noticed you created this redirect a few months ago, and I was curious what the "(identifier)" disambiguator was intended to represent in the title? There may be sufficient context that I could be missing. Thank you. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi! This is linked by the template Template:University of Twente Pure, in which you need the identifier suffix to link through. Similar to how in doi:10.example, the link on "doi" routes through an "(identifier)" link. This is required on external ID templates. Thanks for reaching out! BhamBoi (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The doi template links to a page called Doi (identifier) because Doi is a disambiguation page. I've looked through a few templates that use external IDs and the only times any use a link to an "(identifier)", is when there is a conflict with other similar titles, or if the identifier itself is discussed at the target page, so the "(identifier)" specifies this discrepancy as well as the section the redirect applies to. Pure BIB is not mentioned at all at the redirect's current target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I would like to point out that the reason this is required (please read the text in Template:R from citation identifier) is that without the (identifier) suffix, incoming links from template transclusions will clutter the "What Links Here" page; this practice is not something I made up. Additionally, it is used in non-ambiguous identifier names, such as Template:PMID linking through PMID (identifier). The point you mention about the bibliographic database not being mentioned at the target is fair, and I will add info about it to the target, and then all should be resolved. Cheers, BhamBoi (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

P.S. I have also replied at the RfD. BhamBoi (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Carrick Moore

Hello, BhamBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Carrick Moore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Numeral incorporation

Hello, BhamBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Numeral incorporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Journal Tribune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WMTW.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

"University of Twente Pure BIB (identifier)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect University of Twente Pure BIB (identifier) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29 § University of Twente Pure BIB (identifier) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Detroit Urban Survival Training (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Detroit Urban Survival Training and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John Carrick Moore

Hello, BhamBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Carrick Moore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Numeral incorporation

Hello, BhamBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Numeral incorporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BhamBoi. Thank you for your work on Genesis.com. User:Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Washington Oregon Higher Education Sustainability Conference

Hello, BhamBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Washington Oregon Higher Education Sustainability Conference, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Collab?

Hello @BhamBoi, I hope you are doing good. I am here after I found you on the guild of copy editors and approaching to invite you to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Andhra Pradesh/Assembly constituencies update - 2023, where we are working to bringing in consistency to a series of articles. If you had like to join in this drive then you are most welcome. 456legend(talk) 04:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kenneth E. Goodson

Hello, BhamBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kenneth E. Goodson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Web of Science ID" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Web of Science ID has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6 § Web of Science ID until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

"Web of Science ID (identifier)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Web of Science ID (identifier) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6 § Web of Science ID (identifier) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robert I. Tilling

Hello, BhamBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert I. Tilling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at National Resource Center. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't think I did? BhamBoi (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Looking back, thanks for removing that – I had drafted my edits in my sandbox, and when I copied the text over, it included a link to the page in my sandbox from some reason. Definitely an error because I know better. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. BhamBoi (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)