User talk:Bhumi2tandon

Your thread has been archived

{{nobots}}

Hi Bhumi2tandon! You created a thread called Editing a protected page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Bhumi2tandon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Eagleash (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Setu Controversy (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Ram Setu Controversy may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Bhumi2tandon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok am submitting it again with corrections Bhumi2tandon (talk) 15:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Page deleted in the midst of editions

Hi My page "Ram Setu controversy" was deleted while I was in the process of making the necessary corrections. As per instruction am contacting you again to let you know that the draft is being resubmitted with corrections Bhumi2tandon (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Setu Controversy (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ram Setu Controversy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ram Setu Controversy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 15:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Please provide specific instances where you find the sources not reliable since most of the references are from leading newspapers in India and interviews by Top Geologists in India Bhumi2tandon (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Setu controversy (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Ram Setu controversy may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 17:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ram Setu controversy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ram Setu controversy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://archaeotravel.eu/?paged=2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eagleash (talk) 17:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violations

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

This appears to be the third time the page noted above has been created and identified as a copyright violation; on this occasion under a slightly different title which could be taken as an attempt to get around the issue incorrectly. Wikipedia will not accept violations and persisting could result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The copyrighted material has already been removed after you last pointed it out. This is the third time my page has been deleted in last five hours. What is this!! Bhumi2tandon (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation was pointed out with respect to reference to a website www.myRameshwaram.com that reference was deleted immediately infact the page was deleted for the first time while I was in the middle of making the requisite edit. Bhumi2tandon (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The second time no copyright violation was pointed out. Neither has any been specifically mentioned the third time Bhumi2tandon (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Bhumi2tandon, I want to ask you a question. I expect that you answer truthfully. The question is:

Have you written the text in Draft:Ram_Setu_controversy yourself?

I can look deeper when I got an answer from you. It may take me up to 24 hours for me to notice a response.

Notice from Edit conflict message: The aparent source URL was given at leats for the third time, this one. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok just noticed the second copyright violation message. Excuse me but this is my first page submission. So why was this second copyright violation pointed out at the first go, I mean why two different rejections for two different violations could have sited both violations for correction at the first go itself Bhumi2tandon (talk) 17:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ofcourse I have written the article myself sir. Infact I am personally in contact with the Geologist who first declared the Ram Setu to be a man made structure. Have been researching this topic since almost an year now. Now please let me know can I recreate a new page with the same name and submit the content after removing the copyright violation? Bhumi2tandon (talk) 18:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok Victor I see where the misunderstanding is, because this copyright violation has been pointed out to me only once. First time another link was cited for copyright violation so while I was in the process of removing it within minutes of receiving the violation message the page was deleted.

Second time I have no idea why my page was deleted because no copyright violation was pointed out to me.

Third time now another link has been pointed out as copyright violation

This is my first page submission with wiki so please bear with me but why could the two copyright violations be pointed out the first time itself? Bhumi2tandon (talk) 18:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok am submitting the page again for the fourth time now after removing the copyright violation link. Am in a bit of a hurry wanted to get this work done as soon as possible actually. Got a few things lined up. Bhumi2tandon (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok so my page is now ready for review. Had put in a lot of time and work into finalizing the page before submitting it for the first time so was expecting this to go smoothly. Anyways, now have removed all the possible copyright violations only newsagency citations given now and all reference errors pointed out have also been corrected though the references have been given manually. Somehow the "Review" option is not coming now so here's the link please let me know https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ram_Setu_Controversy Bhumi2tandon (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Setu Controversy (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ram Setu Controversy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ram Setu Controversy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bhumi2tandon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Here you state that you are in contact with "the Geologist who first declared the Ram Setu to be a man made structure" – this is presumably S. Badrinarayanan, whose work has been presented in a less than neutral fashion in the draft. That you have a conflict of interest here means that it is extra important to allow other editors to weigh in, and that uninvolved editors get to decide whether any parts of the draft can be published. bonadea contributions talk 11:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes am aware of the Conflict of interest guidelines. Want to clarify one thing here, I got in contact with Dr Badrinarayan as also with many others who have been giving for and against views on the topic 'while researching' this topic itself. If you read the entire conversation I have mentioned there that I have been researching this matter since almost an year now. If you are finding any unnecessary mention of any one individual in the article that can always be edited but the thing is that Dr Badrinarayan is the person who started the entire academic aspect of the controversy with his startling discovery and so the article cannot be without a mention about him. And the legal aspect of the controvert was started by Dr Subramanian Swamy who is also mentioned in the article so it's not possible to ignore these two people while covering the topic bhumi2tandon

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Setu Controversy (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphimblade was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ram Setu Controversy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ram Setu Controversy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Respected sir Thank you very much for your warning telling me not resubmit the article without addressing the issue pointed out by the previous reviewer. Actually I had posted a message on the page itself in order to ensure the reviewer understands the tricky situation I was in with respect to resolving the issue but someone deleted it.

Please go through my coversation below with the previous reviewer and you will understand why I was in no position to fix the problem.

Copy of my conversation:-

"Please see a copy of my conversation with him below.

"The POV forks have already been fixed please check. Actually this is my first wiki page submission so I guess every place has its own style and language in which content is required to be written. Be it newspaper or websites :))

You cannot "fix" it. The whole thing is a POV fork. The answer was "no", and will remain "no" no matter how many times you repeat the question. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

You are entitled to your opinion and I respect that but a gentler tone would be appreciated. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 14:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Mr Seraphimblade At 14:20 I objected to a high toned message from you and requested you to use a gentler tone and within 20 minutes of my message you went ahead and declined my draft page submission and arbitrarily closed a discussion that was posted on the page with respect to the merger of the page which was started today morning only and in which only you had given your opinion so far. The page was supposed to remain open for atleast seven days as per guidelines. I find this act on your behalf highly vindictive and prejudiced. Let me remind you that while Wikipedia grants some discretionary powers such vindictive acts are not covered by that.

Had you deleted my page the first time you went through it and thought it to be a POV fork I would not have objected but the action was done within 20 minutes of my submitting a message respectfully objecting to you high toned message this is clearly a vindictive act and highly objectionable behaviour for a place like wikipedia. Let me remind you no one not even you OWN the Wikipedia and small editors like us are the reason the Wikipedia exists. I would really appreciate if you stay away from the draft page now."

How can I fix the reason for decline when the page was declined vindictively and arbitrarily after removing a discussion posted in the group with respect to its merger that had been opened in morning only and in which only the reviewer had given his opinion so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhumi2tandon (talk • contribs) 00:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Setu Controversy (October 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Snowycats was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The topic is not notable as a separate page. To not further disrupt our AfC process, I have declined this article as it has been clearly stated in the discussion on the talk page what the appropriate merge moves are. This article is not to be re-submitted but rather merged into the appropriate places.

Snowycats (talk) 05:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

No personal attacks

The next time you unreasonably refer to an editor as acting "vindictively", as you did here and here, or make some other similar attack, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Please read our policy No personal attacks and the guideline Assume good faith. Bishonen | tålk 11:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC).

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam's Bridge. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Changing the lead so that it no longer matches the title of the article, particularly when you know that it is at the moment the consensus title, is clearly disruptive. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bhumi2tandon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edit conflict, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Waiting for evidence that I deleted your edit as described on my talk page

Link? Doug Weller talk 18:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ram Setu Controversy

Hello, Bhumi2tandon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ram Setu Controversy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ram Setu Controversy

Hello, Bhumi2tandon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ram Setu Controversy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)