Jump to content

User talk:Bilby/Archive 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
  • Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
  • The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a [p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 2 • February 2023

In This Issue

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Removal of information

Why are you removing information that has source of reference?. 1keyhole (talk) 11:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Ossy, I thought that was clear by the edit summaries. If you are interpreting sources to come up with a new conclusion not contined in either, you are performing original research. So when you wrote "What's notable about the article is that it emphasizes that CEDU was not working with addicts or delinquents" you are editorialising, especially given that the article did not emphasis that at all. In regard to the second claim, "The original CEDU program did not believe in the use of medicine.", I could find no mention in the source of "medicine", nor a claim that they didn't belive in it. - Bilby (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: March 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 3 • March 2023

In This Issue

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Technology acceptance model

Hello, Bilby,

Thank you so much for fixing this article. I don't know how I missed that it was a 20 year old article and shouldn't be moved to Draft space. I just looked at state of the article and it looked like so many of the recent student projects that are getting put prematurely into main space at this time of the school year. Thank you for correcting my error. It's appreciated! Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

No worries! I have it on my watchlist and thought we had a difficult set of circumstances - a student project that broke the article, coupled with an unnecessary page move, with some text that just didn't hang together. I absoltutely understood where you were comming from, but thought that reverting the student changes with a page move would solve the problem. If it wasn't a topic I was very familiar with I would probably have gone the same way. So all is good!
Just as a matter of odd coincidences, I was going over a lecture I'm supposed to give tomorrow and saw that it started with TAM, so strangely this all works together. :) - Bilby (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: April 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 4 • April 2023

In This Issue

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Dinoz1 (chat?) (he/him) 15:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Olya Zueva

Hello there, and happy adminship anniversary! Since a template was put by you on the respective page saying it might have been created against undisclosed payments, I am afraid if if my account is at risk. MrAnmol (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request of Reunited7777

I'm reviewing an unblock request for this editor. It looks like they were blocked for socking, but I don't see any record of them at SPI or who the master is in the block log, and I'm not immediately familiar with the sockmaster. Could you clarify who you blocked them as a sock of? Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry, I should have added the SP tag - I'll fix that. The suspected master is User:Expertwikiguy, SPI [1]. Blocked on behavioural evidence, but you can see the standard paid editor model that the user employs: one edit to the user page with something innoculous to stop it being a redlink; edit in general for a short while to avoid looking like an SPA, then create the paid article in mainspace. - Bilby (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, definitely lines up once I know that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: June 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 5 • June 2023

In This Issue

Professor article

For Hans Bosse, I'm surprised that a dead social sciences researcher could be paid content. What's the evidence that it was paid?

I think we can try to clean it up if that's really the case.

He recently died, and it was pretty big news for ethnologists/anthropologists working in certain areas of social psychology. Noelicneon (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

It can only be cleaned up by someone independent of the subject, otherwise it simply compunds the issue. - Bilby (talk) 23:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
I'm independent of the subject, but you seem to think that whoever created it probably isn't. I don't know who created it, and I have just asked him to address these issues. How did you figure out that the article creator got paid for it? Social sciences researchers, to be frank, are generally not known for being rich people who can afford to throw money at self-promotional pages. Noelicneon (talk) 23:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:Beans I think it best that I don’t go into details, but I’ll pass it on to a functionary if need be. It may well be worth an SPI. - Bilby (talk) 00:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stoked On Fishing

Hello Bilby,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stoked On Fishing for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Stoked On Fishing to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 11:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on CEDU

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page CEDU, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Contemporary fantasy

Hi, you reverted my edit on this page. If you'd like to discuss the page, please could you do so at Talk:Contemporary fantasy. Looking forward to hearing from you. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Contemporary fantasy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Contemporary fantasy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary fantasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CohenTheBohemian (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Bryan Scott (quarterback)

Hi, you reverted an edit of mine that I had done as requested by an editor on the article talk page. Your edit summary was "needs to be added by someone independent of the subject". Was that aimed at me or at the editor who had made the request? Equine-man (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi! That was aimed at you - because of the ongoing issue with paid editors on that page, the text should really be added by someone independent. - Bilby (talk) 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Erm, I’m not paid, wish I was I’d be rich. I saw the edit request and checked the link and the edit request looked like what was said in the reference, I don’t understand the sport, so if the edit request was not in line with the reference or sourced properly, let me know. Equine-man (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, but I've been provided with evidence to the contrary. - Bilby (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Good. I don't like paid editors. I should have checked page history before doing an edit. Thanks for reverting. Equine-man (talk) 09:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: July 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 7 • July 2023

In This Issue

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Placement of COI banners on articles

Moved from Talk:Edward Forman § Paid editing
@Bilby:, I do appreciate your message on my Talk page, as well as what you're trying to do. However, you simply cannot place that tag unilaterally with no evidence, especially when it amounts to an unsupported accusation against an editor and appears to be an assumption of bad faith. Your allegations so far are just that—allegations made by you, and nothing else. Please self-revert and remove this tag, or else provide specific evidence for it. Please do not ignore this message. Mathglot (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm a bit lost as to what you expect. There is a clear ad to edit this article on upwork; a contractor was hired to edit the article; that contractor was paid for their edits to this article; and a known and admitted paid editor was the only editor who made changes to the article from the time the ad was placed and the contractor was paid. It seems pretty clear to me. - Bilby (talk) 23:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if you're giving me the runaround, or what. I expect you to place your evidence here, directly under this comment. I plan to take you to a noticeboard if you fail to remove the banner without providing evidence. The safe route is to just remove it for now, add your evidence, and then gain consensus for it. Mathglot (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
This isn't a matter of saying that the article was edited by a paid editor - the tag only says that there is reasonable suspicion of such. I have reasonable supicion of such. But I'll address this another way. I'll see what the edtor has to say, and based on that I'll take it to the next step - the obvious next step is a link to the job ad, although I don't like doing that due to a risk of outing, but that is better done at COIN than here. - Bilby (talk) 07:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I've raised the issue at WP:COIN#Edward Forman. - Bilby (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
This is not even a living person, not sure where the COI comes from. I have been reading George Pendle’s Strange Angel and all my edit is based on that (Parsons and Malina pages were more complete, I started with Forman). And I believe I made some improvement, although I am still working on his works after the GALCIT period. Sabih omar 14:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
COIN is a good start; to avoid outing, you can email any admin by using the email link in the tools in the left sidebar (legacy 2010 editor); not sure where the link is in the current editor. Mathglot (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I think I see the key point to this disagreement: we are arguing at cross-purposes. The nucleus of it is here:

the tag only says that there is reasonable suspicion of such. I have reasonable supicion of such.

You are arguing about whether there is paid editing, but I'm not. I am arguing whether you have the right to unilaterally place a banner of this nature, without consensus. To me, you may be right about the paid editing, or you may be wrong, but that is beside the point. You, as an individual editor, have no right to place a banner on an article visible to everyone on the internet, based on your sole suspicion about some other editor; that is a complete no-go. That tag implies that *there is a consensus* at Wikipedia that there is paid editing on the article, not that one editor among 140,000 a active editors suspects that there is. That goes double, when some other editor has expressed their reservations by removing the tag, and you've doubled down and tripled down to reinsert it, in the face of opposition. In my opinion, you are in violation of several policies consensus and AGF prime among them, and while the discussion here or at COIN is going on, you should observe policy and remove the banner. It's fine to put it back afterward, if that's what the consensus is. Mathglot (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

I realized that the discussion formerly at Talk:Edward Forman wasn't really appropriate at that venue, as it is a behavior/policy issue about placement of banners, and not really anything to do with improving the article itself; hence, it belongs here, and not on the article Talk page. Apologies for the wrong venue. As far as your issue, concerning the COIN discussion, I'll monitor it with interest. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Just noticed your comment at WP:COIN that you are an admin. That raised an eyebrow; per WP:ADMINCOND, you are held to a higher standard. How is triply inserting a template on an article page in the face of two reverts and Talk page opposition commensurate with that? Maybe there's something deep down in some guideline that gives admins wider latitude in placing templates of this sort; if so, please drop a link, and I'll stop bothering you. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Looks like the COIN issue is settled, due to Sabih's disclosure at the noticeboard. Afaic, that settles it: the banner stays, and I'm happy to move on. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 02:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Bilby. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Sent a follow-up email. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

YOU ROCK!!! Keep on editing :]

Babysharkboss2 was here!! 15:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Conektr Tech

Hello dear Bilby, I came across with a tag of undisclosed payment in one of the articles I created which is totally against the truth. I kindly ask you to review my previous contributions before claiming this! Thanks in advance! Worldviewfrom (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, I have done so, which is why it has been tageed. - Bilby (talk) 10:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Together Price

Hi @Bilby! I noticed that you recently deleted Draft:Together Price, and I understand that it was due to my failure to comply with the necessary actions. I have already disclosed it on my user page using the PAID template. I've been away for a few weeks and just returned, so I wasn't able to disclose it sooner. I though that after submission, it would take four months for a review and didn't check afterward. I sincerely apologize for this. I'm hoping you could assist me in recovering the draft since I would like to work on it further. If it is not possible, could I still recreate the same page using AfC? Moving forward, I will ensure to disclose any paid contributions. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your response.~~~~ Sydneycindy (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I stuffed up. I meant to block your account at the same time, but it looks like that didn't go through. I'll take care of it now. - Bilby (talk) 08:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: September 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 7 • September 2023

In This Issue

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Ad verecundiam fallacy

Hello. Why do you keep deleting my changes? My version might not be perfect but it certainly is 1000 times better than the current one since at least it is truthful. You haven't fixed the article that states lies in months, and seem to defend it from saying the truth whenerver I try. Feel free to add sources; but only the last section I added is "uncited", since I could only cite examples. Besides, citebombing is useless and stupid. Adding multiple citations from cringe sources such as philosophy.org or something like that can never be better than quoting Locke. My article is definitely not "completely unsourced" at all; I just didn't abuse of it like the previous version that has 5 citations on each word.

Whatever change is for better should be kept even if it momentarily lacks of citations. Adolphitus (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: October 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 8 • October 2023

In This Issue

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppet and COI complaint

Hi, I am complaining about the freelancer continuously publishing spams in return of payments. She is from Dubai and below is her Upwork profile where you can find the evidence:

https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01bfb4d3cfe85e7304

Below are the pages, she published in return of payments:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transkriptor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Penn

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webz.io

Also, you can see the feedback on her profile which means she is continuously violating Wikipedia TOS. Also, she is created many accounts for publishing spams. 39.48.3.223 (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@JJMC89, Girth Summit, and MER-C: (as others left messages by the IP). I've looked over the recent jobs by this user but I don't see anything that can links them to these jobs. Agree that they smell of UPE however! SmartSE (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
I can confirm Transkriptor, as I was able to identify the job. I'd also add Draft:Simon Gillett to the list. I cannot confirm either Linda Penn nor Webz.io, but they don't seem impossible. I guess I should pass this on to en-paid. - Bilby (talk) 09:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Bilby. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha.
Message added 12:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

About suspicious accounts

Regarding the account you've been asking about paid contributions, I had already come close to blocking it as a duck before the explicit claim that it is the only account of that editor, per the suspicious overlap in the history at Tom Malloy and at the deleted history of Jonathan Melton. In the case of Tom Malloy, the currently active account added a headshot and apparently also e-mailed VRT about it after the previous editor added a since-deleted headshot. There is also overlap in the style of talk page messages (grammatically rare use of the word "detail" in several instances). This could be taken to SPI if necessary or to look for sleepers, but I think it could also just be acted upon if you see the same things I see.

I was also bemused by the characterization of Quentin Bryce as uncited and of questionable notability.... Dekimasuよ! 13:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Cf. this and this with the two accounts editing in succession, which I only discovered after writing the previous message. Dekimasuよ! 13:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
They also overlap on multiple pages with [2], already blocked for undisclosed paid editing. Dekimasuよ! 13:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I missed that you had added Leojuan, but I came across them independently, so that does seem likely if we both came to the same conclusion. I have a couple more acounts I could add, one of which I am certain of. I passed on the two accounts that I knew of to paid-en, so at this stage I think it might be best to sit on it, and then add any they might miss. The problem is that they seem backlogged, so I don't know how long until they are able to get to it. To be clear, though, I have no doubt about the UPE, and I think we can now add at least 4 socks to the list. - Bilby (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: November 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 9 • November 2023

In This Issue

Happy Holidays!


Colman2000 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Colman2000 (talk) 07:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Merry Christmas, Bilby!
Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity.

RV (talk) 07:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Season's greetings


Christmas postcard featuring Santa Claus using a zeppelin to deliver gifts, by Ellen Clapsaddle, 1909
~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~
Hello Bilby: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Spread the love; use {{subst:User:Dustfreeworld/Xmas1}} to send this message.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2024!

Happy New Year!
Hello Bilby:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Joseph Phua

I have a conflict of interest for this article on Wikipedia and have been hired to request edits so that it meets all rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. The history shows you as the highest ranking person who edited the article. I was told by client that previous editors have attempted but did not disclose an affiliation so I am wondering if you can confirm that I did the proper disclosure. I made it to my userpage per the rules in PAYDISCLOSE. I am wondering if the article itself can be removed from Wikipedia and put into my sandbox space so that I can make improvements necessary for the Wikipedia community to review. GrantFortyNine (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I am surprised that someone without prior Wikidpedia-editing experience was hired. Yes, the disclosure is correct, so thank you for doing that. No, unfortunately the article cannot be moved into a sandbox, but you can develop a new version in your sandbox at User:GrantFortyNine/Sandbox if you wish to do so, and then you can easily request people to check it through the discussion page at Talk:Joseph Phua. - Bilby (talk) 12:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

I played around with Wikipedia when it first launched but that was more than 20 years ago. From what I see, it has developed quite a bit since then so will take me a minute to get acquainted. Also to be fair, I am not technically being paid (per se). I am working on another marketing project for client and when this was mentioned I told him that I would see what I could do to assist. If I read the terms of use correctly, I would still be considered a paid editor since I am being compensated overall. Thank you for the advice on the sandbox. I will start there and see how to move forward. --GrantFortyNine (talk) 03:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Am I allowed to edit Wikipedia outside of the Joseph Phua article? If there is something you recommend to help me get a better feel for editing I would appreciate the advice. --GrantFortyNine (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

I have requested the replacement of the current article with the one I edited in my sandbox. I think I did it correctly. Hopefully. Feedback is appreciated. --GrantFortyNine (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

This Month in Education: January 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 1 • January 2024

In This Issue

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

James Baillieu

I am a colleague of James Bailleau and noticed that

had been added to the article.

Noting that there has been no edits since September 2023, I wondered why this has been added four months later.

It detracts from what is otherwise an interesting and well designed article.

What is needed to have it reverted?

CutiePieFYA (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The tag is needed because the article was created and edited by multiple undisclosed paid editors and it has not subsequently been independently verified. The tag highlights the issue to allow independent editors to know of and address the concerns. - Bilby (talk) 02:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your quick response. How is the article independently verified? Is this something as an independent editor that I could help with? I'm am quite willing to spend the time to assist James to resolve this issue.
Do I attempt to find these undisclosed paid editors? Is there a tool that can help me?
CutiePieFYA (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Please respond to my message of 13 days ago.
CutiePieFYA (talk) 22:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It needs to be checked by someone who is not connected to the article. It has been flagged to allow editors to know that there is a concern, and at some point an independent editor will check the article and remove the tag if apparopriate. - Bilby (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Reversion of source addition on Ross Coulthart page

Hi Bilby, regarding your revert on my source addition. Can we come to a compromise? I believe the source I included added context to the original source for that sentence. The original only cited the Australian Skeptics as the source for the claim that Coulthart believed that governments around the world including the Vatican had suppressed information regarding UAPs. My source confirms that he believes that certain governments are suppressing UAP knowledge and, in my interpretation, he appears to support the claim that the Vatican was involved too. At the very least he didn't push back on his interviewee and carefully reiterated the interviewee's claim regarding the Vatican later on. True, it doesn't support anything regarding the bent spoon but it does help add context to the second half of the sentence. What do you think, is there room for compromise here? OneUpOnUs (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

The source failed validation. It needed to a) mention the bent spoon award, b) include the quote, or c) show that he actually belives that the Vatican is supressing claims about UFOs, rather than simply interviewing someone and saying "if they are correct". We need to be very clear with BLPs to avoid harming the subjects. - Bilby (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Understood, thanks for your time OneUpOnUs (talk) 02:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Adem Somyurek

Hi Bilby, They're back at it again, removing sourced material from the article with no explanation and no prior discussion. See Special:Diff/1208676162.

Regards, TarnishedPathtalk 13:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Saw that. I think a block is warranted - thanks for letting me know! - Bilby (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Bugger me you were fast. Your block notice showed up at the same instant I left them a message. TarnishedPathtalk 13:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I saw the edits and was considering what to do. Your comments made it easier. I hate using WP:NOTHERE, as I think that is the most misused block rationale. But in this case I think it very much applies. - Bilby (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I think it was pretty clear they were an SPA, and the project needs those like I need a hole in the head (not at all). TarnishedPathtalk 13:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I completely agree. :) - Bilby (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Zygmunt Łanowski (d. 1989) and Alf Tergel (d. 2007)

You've tagged both of these articles as "undisclosed paid", based on the record of the now-blocked creator/editor. However, they are both close translations of the pre-existing articles (on the Polish and Swedish Wikipedias respectively), and they would not be much different, if at all, if an unpaid editor had translated / created them. What needs to be done to remove the tags? Thanks, Ingratis (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Quite often I find that one person is hired to do both languages, or someone was hired to do one language in the past and now someone else is being hired to translate it. That said, if you go over the articles and think they are fine, I have no problem at all with the tags being removed. - Bilby (talk) 06:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
OK, thanks - it just seemed unlikely to me that anyone, even their publishing houses, would think it worth paying for articles on dead translators. I'll check them carefully before de-tagging. Ingratis (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
I suspect that this is the case, but at the same time I've seen a lot of articles about surprising subjects advertised online. Often by relatives, which I guess makes sense. - Bilby (talk) 10:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Right - I overlooked that! but I think these two are prob notable anyway - I'll take care that the references are strong enough. Ingratis (talk) 10:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
No problem at all. Thanks for taking care of it. - Bilby (talk) 10:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Susan Gerbic

Hello, Bilby. Thank you for your recent edits to this article. I would like to draw your attention to this edit, where Jamesthepilot has posted similar material again. It looks like a POV rant to me, but I won't edit the article myself, because as a member of GSoW my judgement may not be impartial. I would be grateful if you take a look at it, and use your own judgement about what you think is appropriate. Gronk Oz (talk) 23:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know - sorry that I missed that. Fortunately it has been taken care of. :) - Bilby (talk) 23:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Howdy!

Could you check out @Adarshalphons9's edit to Adarsh Alphons? He removed a COI template you added, and I'd just like your opinion. Cheers! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for opening this discussion. Unless there's a provable conflict, it would not be fair to go about marking random wiki pages with these conflict templates. The person marking templates as such should also address the larger question - are the contributions made up/ fabricated or are the contents independently verifiable? I would assert that all content mentioned can be corroborated via a legitimate publications. Please feel free to search on any search engine you prefer. Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I will not comment on article content, however another user seems to have been in contact with you way back in 2018. That implies at the very least an instance of COI editing, regardless of factual accuracy. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I have continued the discussion on @Adarshalphons9's page. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out! Very interesting. I have no idea who this is. When I click on their profile, it goes to a blank page. Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Whom are you referring to? 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Shaheba Sultana Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Ah. See User_talk:Shaheba_Sultana#October_2018_2 specifically "So what can I do now? I gave much information whatever I know to verify this article! And Adarsh himself gave me his all information to make this page. People want this article in google so that they can search easily! Help me please! Thank you Shaheba Sultana (talk) 12:51 pm, 25 October 2018, Thursday (UTC−4)" 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 2 • February 2024

In This Issue
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bilby/Archive_18&oldid=1219913616"