User talk:Bmstephany

Image copyright problem with Image:Reeves Field.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Reeves Field.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Northwood Hall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Northwood Hall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva images[edit]

I have reverted your changes and addition of new pictures: not because I own the page, but because (1) you removed existing pictures without explanation or anything else, and (2) because your pictures tend to have copyright problems. If you'd like to restore them, please explain on the Geneva College talk page or on my talk page. Nyttend 22:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is more Wikipedia than I am, unless you mean (1) Jimbo, or (2) an administrator. If you want, an administrator will be called. Do you want an administrator? Nyttend 03:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for using your own pictures — it's always easier when you take them yourself :-) By the way, you need to check your camera: the pictures both say that they were taken in January of 2003 in the information at the bottom, so your camera's internal calendar and/or clock must be off. Nyttend 19:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Northwood Hall.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Northwood Hall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nyttend 03:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Johnston Gym.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Johnston Gym.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nyttend 03:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Old main.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Old main.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nyttend 03:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Reeves Field.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Reeves Field.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nyttend 03:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva College[edit]

If the two people you're adding to this article really are notable, why not create articles about them? Make sure you've carefully read the notability criteria first, so you know what kinds of sources are required by Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Notability again. It has the following sections for people who are inherently notable: Nyttend 00:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Politicians: Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislatures.
- Athletes: Competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming or tennis.

And besides, the notability guidelines are not actually required for mentioning something in an article (as the main notability guidelines specifically state). Rather, notability is with regards to whether something should have its own article. If a politician is notable enough to have their own article, they're surely automatically worth noting as someone who is linked with a school/college/university. Also, Bmstephany, please remember to stay civil when dealing other editors. Comments such as this one contain personal remarks, and potentially personal attacks. Thanks. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 01:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, in your Johnston Gym picture: is the little white bit on Eastvale Hill a part of the G? Nyttend 03:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: because you're taking your own pictures and uploading them with free licenses, I'd recommend that you create an account on the Wikimedia Commons. It's just as easy as creating an account on Wikipedia, and it means that your pictures would be much more widely available than they are on Wikipedia only. Nyttend 04:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people[edit]

My point of view is this: judging by the notability guidelines and by the existence of a vast number of biographical articles, precedent exists for state senators and MLB players being notable without question. As a result, we can list their names, even if there isn't an article, because it's obvious that the person is notable. The only way really to prove this is to attempt to delete an article on a relatively minor state legislator or professional sportsman, which I would judge a violation of this guideline. However, authors and nonprofit organisational heads are not inherently notable. How can notability be proven? Only an article can prove notability properly, since the point of having the notable alumni list is to give the names and a explanation of who the person is, not to demonstrate the person's notability. Moreover, the descriptions that you gave don't prove notability, and the Mueller one sounds rather POV as well. This is my judgement: that the only names that belong on any "notable people" list are those who (1) are inherently notable, such as the state senators and MLB players, or (2) otherwise notable and have an article about them.

Please remember that I'm not saying that these two men aren't notable — it's simply that I don't have reason to believe that they are either notable or non-notable. Create articles on them, demonstrating their notability by the guidelines that you've already read, and their names will deserve mention on the college page. Nyttend 01:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the in-person meeting: I'd not be automatically unwilling to see you, but I'd rather not discuss this one-on-one. Wikipedia works by building consensus, and as a result it's better to allow others to be able to see the results of this discussion. I've made my decisions because I believe that they follow policy — and I assume that you've done likewise — and our work should be visible to the community. A face-to-face meeting will mean that it's just the two of us, without any possibility of direct input from the community at large better to inform us of our obviously non-compliant understandings of Wikipedia policy. Nyttend 01:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest notice[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Geneva College, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bmstephany, I am not an administrator, just an editor here (like everyone). My understanding of COI policy is that for substantial Geneva College edits (besides reverting vandalism, and other minor changes) you should suggest all of them on the talk page first, and if other, neutral editors are OK with them, then they will implement your changes. Please see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance. Please note this is not the same as discussing changes afterwards on other user's talk pages. Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images deleted[edit]

Hello, I have deleted following images as possible copyright violations:

You have said that you have the right to release these images under a free licence. Please confirm this as described at Wikipedia:Copyright problems#Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia. The images can be undeleted after the confirmation. Conscious 16:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva enrolment[edit]

Answers:

Question 1: a reference to a published (either book or online) resource; if it's only available to people like you that work for the college administration, or if we can only get it on the college intranet, it doesn't count
Question 2: you're right, and therefore I have tagged them. Nyttend 23:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva enrolment[edit]

Answers:

Question 1: a reference to a published (either book or online) resource; if it's only available to people like you that work for the college administration, or if we can only get it on the college intranet, it doesn't count
Question 2: you're right, and therefore I have tagged them. Nyttend 23:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Castle High School[edit]

That's fine. To be honest, you make a good point. I would probably say, make a redlink to all of the schools. That way, it leaves open the possibility for the page to be created since more high school pages seem to be created as of late. I mostly redlinked New Castle because the main New Castle, Pennsylvania page had half the page listed with "Notable New Castle High School Graduates", which I don't think was necessary on the page to begin with. I ended up cutting it down to just "Notable Residents" like most pages have, and only those that have some noterity nationally, as most of those people were only known in New Castle, and even then it was debatable. That redlink was for whoever wanted to create the page if they wanted to relist those people again. Jgera5 03:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! :-) Welcome to WikiProject Universities![edit]

Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Universities! Our goals are to standardize the structure and content of all college and university articles, improve Wikipedia's coverage of these articles (hopefully propelling them to featured article status), and serve as the central resource for all discussions and information related to colleges and universities on Wikipedia.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The university infobox is one way we hope to standardize our coverage of university articles. All university pages should have this infobox, and relevant fields should be filled in and sourced.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has a few expanding departments, which handle article quality assessment, member recruitment and project awareness and article improvement collaborations.
We have a Student Affairs task force that focuses on Student affairs-specific articles.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
Check out our to do list to get started!

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask one of the project participants or post a question on the talk page. We'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! —- Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Colleges[edit]

Hi, I noticed you tagged St Ambrose College for WP:UNI. I'm afraid this isn't right, in Britain, there are colleges such as sixth form colleges for 16-18 year olds. So a college isn't necessarily a university. I thought I should warn you in case you go around spending a lot of time tagging articles, it would be best to double check what the article describes the college as. Happy editing. Nev1 (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Color Geneva College logo -Converted-.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Color Geneva College logo -Converted-.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cornel West[edit]

Hi Bmstephany. In September 2007, you wrote the following on the talk page of Cornel West:

"Would it make sense to add anything about Dr. West's personal life to this page? He has a wife, Elleni, and a son, Clifton Louis West."

I think it would make a lot of sense to add such information. There doesn't seem to be much in that area about him in the article right now. If you have some appropriate sources, then please feel free to add that information :) Take care. WDavis1911 (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VIII (April 2008)[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on 21:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop at CMU (Aug 15)[edit]

Since you are one of the editors in the Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Pittsburgh, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course (WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed[edit]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.