User talk:Bnnnperdue

Hello world!

August 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Martin City, Missouri has been reverted.
Your edit here to Martin City, Missouri was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.martincity.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bnnnperdue, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bnnnperdue! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Bnnnperdue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Sorry that you got a warning slapped on your user talk page as the first message for what was obviously a good-faith edit. You know, you can just delete such warning messages. Happy editing! — Sebastian 06:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Nancy Pfister.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nancy Pfister.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Carmen Blandin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Carmen Blandin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carmen Blandin Tarleton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carmen Blandin Tarleton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Blandin Tarleton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 06:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Margaret Hamilton (actress), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 11:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daggett, Michigan with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 17:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so angry at me, User:NottNott? I'm not trying to vandalize, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I just wanted to upload a picture of a notable statue on my town's page. If you could tell me how to do this, that would be great. Thanks -Bnnnperdue

If this is what you're trying to add, it's more of a joke than something that has any real value. Sorry. If you have any questions please ask them on my talk page however. Thanks ~ NottNott talk|contrib 18:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mississippi Falls, Wisconsin

The article Mississippi Falls, Wisconsin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any sources to verify the existence of this place; GNIS, USGS and WisDOT maps, Google, and Google Books all turned up nothing. The two listed references don't say anything about this place either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 22:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your new articles

I've been reviewing some of your new articles, and I'm concerned that they aren't meeting Wikipedia's standards of verifiability and factual information. I couldn't find any sources to verify that Mississippi Falls, Wisconsin exists, and while Nettle Creek, Illinois is a real place, most of the information in that article was copied from other articles. If you need help with adding sources and starting new articles, I can help you, but if not, then you should know that adding hoaxes and incorrect information to articles is against Wikipedia policies and will result in the loss of your editing privileges. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 16:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hoarders episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Survived..., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Survived..., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pine Mountain, Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BigTexConlen.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:BigTexConlen.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lake Harmony, Pennsylvania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source

Bnnnperdue, do you have a web site or other reliable source showing that Kim Davis (county clerk) was born in Jackson, KY? As you know, all facts in Wikipedia need to be cited to a reliable source. There is one already showing that she was born in Breathitt County. —Prhart com♥ 15:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Danada, Illinois

Hi, I'm Pmaccabe. Bnnnperdue, thanks for creating Danada, Illinois!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references that support the information provided in it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Phil (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ted DeVita.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ted DeVita.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Fitnr. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Clearing, Chicago, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You moved this page and made a major change without a source. Please remember to include a source for all changes, especially major ones like page moves. Fitnr 02:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danada, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danada, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danada, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fitnr 02:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North Glen Ellyn, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Glen Ellyn, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Glen Ellyn, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fitnr 18:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Elmhurst, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Elmhurst, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Elmhurst, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Innisbrook, Florida for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Innisbrook, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innisbrook, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bertha, Florida for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bertha, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertha, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 17:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Belmont, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belmont, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belmont, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fullersburg, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fullersburg, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fullersburg, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mammoth Springs, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mammoth Springs, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mammoth Springs, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nettle Creek, Illinois for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nettle Creek, Illinois is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nettle Creek, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smartyllama (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your persistent creation of subtle hoaxes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 00:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:DuPage County Illinois incorporated and unincorporated areas North Glen Ellyn higlighted.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DuPage County Illinois incorporated and unincorporated areas North Glen Ellyn higlighted.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 13:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:LocationOfNaperville.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LocationOfNaperville.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:WestonIllinois.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WestonIllinois.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 14:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:DanadaCDPmap.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DanadaCDPmap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cook County Illinois incorporated and unincorporated areas Clearing highlighted.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cook County Illinois incorporated and unincorporated areas Clearing highlighted.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:BerthaFlorida.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BerthaFlorida.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:DuPage County Illinois incorporated and unincorporated areas North Glen Ellyn highlighted.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DuPage County Illinois incorporated and unincorporated areas North Glen Ellyn highlighted.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 14:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:WIMap-doton-Mississippi-Falls.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WIMap-doton-Mississippi-Falls.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dual Freq (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paradise, Clinton County, Missouri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paradise, Clinton County, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise, Clinton County, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bnnnperdue. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:OHMap-doton-Unionport.png

The file File:OHMap-doton-Unionport.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This map is inaccurate to the coordinates given on the article, which are taken from GNIS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NCMap-doton-Barnardesville.png

The file File:NCMap-doton-Barnardesville.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NCMap-doton-Barnardsville.png

The file File:NCMap-doton-Barnardsville.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]