User talk:Bucks104

Welcome!

Hello, Bucks104, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nathan rooney, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Specs112 t c 15:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nathan rooney

The article Nathan rooney has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Specs112 t c 15:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nathan Rooney

The article Nathan Rooney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG & WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack_Cudworth

Hello, Bucks104. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jack_Cudworth, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jack_Cudworth to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you need help doing so, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ukexpat (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Jack Cudworth does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ukexpat (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Cudworth

A tag has been placed on Jack Cudworth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phil Trainer

The article Phil Trainer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phil Trainer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Trainer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Trainer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 13:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danzelle St Louis Hamilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stoke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Roberts (footballer)

The article Tom Roberts (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not played a full international or in a fully professional league. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danzelle St Louis Hamilton

The article Danzelle St Louis Hamilton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not played a full international or in a fully professional league. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Roberts (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Roberts (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Roberts (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danzelle St Louis Hamilton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danzelle St Louis Hamilton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelle St Louis Hamilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phil Trainer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phil Trainer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Trainer

The original deletion of this article is not based on the content but the subject of the article. In order to have an article on Wikipedia, a subject must meet certain inclusion criteria. This is called notability. For athletes, the relevant criteria are outlined at WP:NSPORT. For footballers, the inclusion criteria are having played in a fully pro league (top four divisions in England) or for his/her country's national team. Mr. Trainer fails both these criteria. Once deleted by discussion, articles on the same subject (i.e. about the same person) may be summarily deleted without discussion, if they are not substantively different to the article previously deleted. Repeated recreation of such articles can be construed as vandalism. I hope this clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryan Young (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Young (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Willmott (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 02:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathan Rooney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Rooney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Rooney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nathan Rooney

Accuracy is not the issue here. As I explained to you about a month ago (see the section on Phil Trainer above), in order for a footballer to have an article on Wikipedia, he must have either received significant coverage, played in a fully professional league, or played for his country's national team. For Mr. Rooney, none of these apply. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But he's played in the conference national why doesn't that count ?

Again, I refer you to my comment on Phil Trainer. Only the top four divisions of English football confer notability under WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Lloyd (Boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryan Young (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Young (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Young (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C 679 18:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates and refernces

Hi, when updating infobox stats could you update the 'pcupdate' or 'club-update' parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made.

Also, could you ensure a reliable source is present that gives the player stats, in the articles you update? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep these in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wes Baynes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wes Baynes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Nathan Baker (footballer). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ciaran Clark, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jay Denny, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The infobox stats you added were unsourced. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lee Vaughan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lee Vaughan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]