User talk:Bulklana

This is Bulklana's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justinian Caire (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Any Wikipedia article should start with a lead that gives a summary of why the subject is notable. In this case, I can't find any statement anywhere in the article that tells me why this subject is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justinian Caire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bulklana! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justinian Caire has been accepted

Justinian Caire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludwig Brieger has been accepted

Ludwig Brieger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madeleine Wade

The article Madeleine Wade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actress with no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madeleine Wade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeleine Wade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine Wade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 22:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kraiburg TPE

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kraiburg TPE, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help with page

Looking for standard template. JosephBenning (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph. Editing a page in the visual editor, click insert - template Bulklana (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can search for the template you need here: Category:Wikipedia templates Bulklana (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. JosephBenning (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Bulklana,

I noticed that you tagged W.i.S.H. for a Proposed deletion 17 minutes after the article was created! 17 minutes is not enough time for an editor to create and develop an article, much less reference it properly. I just deleted another article that you tagged about 40 minutes after it was created. I understand you are not a new page patroller, but the rule of thumb for patrollers is that they should allow at least an hour after a page creator has stopped editing a brand new article before tagging it for any type of deletion, CSD, PROD or AFD. I'm sure if you had just created an article, you would not appreciate an editor quickly tagging it for deletion while you were still working on it.

Thank you for your consideration for your fellow content creators! If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia or its deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll try to be more careful in the future.Bulklana (talk) 08:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bulklana. Thank you for your work on Ilan Strauss. Alalch E., while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for contributing the new article. Please identify souces among the sources used in the article that meet all three following criteria: (1) reliable secondary source, (2) independent of the subject, (3) contains significant coverage. Please refer to WP:RS if you are unsure about answering this question, and you may also ask about this on the article's talk page, your talk page, or at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Sincerely

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 09:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alalch E.: Hello, thank you for your attention. I will definitely continue working on this article and will improve it and supplement it with links Bulklana (talk) 09:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. But do kindly list the sources that meet the aforementioned criteria, or I might convert the article to a draft for improvement (after which you will be able to follow the WP:AFC process for it to be accepted as an article). —Alalch E. 09:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dnepr Kherson

Hello, Bulklana. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dnepr Kherson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dnepr Kherson

Hello, Bulklana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dnepr Kherson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Guinea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Francisco Guinea, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jdcomix (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Franco Nori

Hello, Bulklana,

Thank you for creating Franco Nori.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Was Franco Nori born in Venezuela, per the text, or born in Genoa, per the infobox? Neither have reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goki Eda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goki Eda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goki Eda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Xegma(talk) 09:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your edit to Draft:Jaffer Khan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bulklana. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Jaffer Khan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bulklana. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bulklana|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]