User talk:CageToRattle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CageToRattle! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! StaticVapor message me! 04:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

August 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, SummerSlam (2019), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 19:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This edit is the edit I am referring to [1] StaticVapor message me! 07:41, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Buddy Murphy. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 22:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Christmas Present, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caution about BLPs[edit]

Wikipedia takes its policy on biographies of living people seriously. Controversial content should always be well-sourced, and unsourced controversial content should never be added. This edit you made was unsourced and inappropriate, and your edit that said "Many media outlets have identified him..." was not supported by the source you included. The article on The Wrap does not say what you claimed it did. Please read WP:BLP and be very conscientious of edits that you make to BLP articles. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Christmas Present, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everyday Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained change[edit]

Give me a Good reason as to why you removed the WOR review from TLC. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 09:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Masked Singer (American season 2), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 23:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of American Idol alumni single sales in the United States, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hzh (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications[edit]

Please note that certification does not equal sales, and hasn't been so for many years, since it is now based on sales plus streams. If an artist gets a lot of streams, then the certification will be high even if that artist does not sell a lot. There are many examples of artist who sold less than 200,000 copies and get a platinum certification, so certification now is highly inaccurate for sales. Hzh (talk) 02:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daughtry isn't that big of a stream artist and most of his sales are through sales. - Cage to Rattle 21:07, December 24, 2019 (CST)

Live from Home moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Live from Home, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Arrowverse. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. -- /Alex/21 23:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 WWE Draft[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2020 WWE Draft, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OfficiallyGoodenough (talkcontribs) 03:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cyberpunk 2077, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cyberpunk 2077, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 00:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You keep changing the information to say that the WrestleMania 36 title change has been confirmed for March 26, 2020, but you have yet to provide an actual source to confirm this, despite being asked multiple times in the edit summary. Saying that Strowman confirmed it in his WWE Chronicle is not enough. We need an actual source. The Chronicle itself can be the source, but you would need to actually cite it and provide Strowman's exact quote. However, that doesn't seem possible as OldSkool01 claims that Strowman does not confirm that in the Chronicle. I would need to go back and watch it myself as I did watch one of the WM36 Chronicles with the intent of seeing if any title change date could be confirmed, but none weren't. I remember Strowman being apart of that one, but I don't remember him confirming the date, unless he got a separate Chronicle that I haven't watched. With all of that said, please stop changing this unless you can provide an actual source. If you ignore this message and continue to change it, administrative action will be sought as you have ignored the messages in the edit summaries multiple times now. --JDC808 18:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strowman has one “Chronicle” episode, which covers Mania 36 through SummerSlam 2020. I went through it with a fine comb and nowhere in the episode does it mention the taping days of Mania. Unless the date was mentioned on another “Chronicle” episode, if so then we need to know which episode it was. OldSkool01 (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just finished watching Strowman's Chronicle (WrestleMania–SummerSlam) about an hour ago and also did not hear/see the tape date mentioned (in fact, the "day of" part for WrestleMania had the air date of April 4 across the screen instead of the tape date). But yeah, like OldSkool01 said, if it's mentioned in a different episode, we would need to know which one. --JDC808 06:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And just to make sure, I went back again and watched the “WWE 24” episode on Mania 36. Also no mention at all of the dates the show was taped. So that rules out 2 different documentaries on the Network. OldSkool01 (talk) 10:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what your edit here to the Drake Younger article was all about? This looks like vandalism to me... If I see any more edits like this from you, you will be blocked. Consider this your only warning. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. I didn't mean to save the edit. I pressed 'preview' and screen captured to post on Reddit. Didn't know I actually confirmed the changes.

Disambiguation link notification for August 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WWE 2K22, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Goldberg and Big E.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert users without explanation, and follow WP:USCHARTS[edit]

It is not acceptable to revert an entirely beneficial, constructive improvement to a page without an explanation. I assume your main disagreement with my edit to World on Fire (Daughtry song) is my removal of the rock song charts. As I literally said in my initial edit summary, WP:USCHARTS says that if a song charted on the Rock & Alternative Songs or the Rock & Alternative Airplay chart, we should not include any component charts, including Hard Rock Songs and their digital sales offshoots. USCHARTS is a content guideline that, by including those charts, you are not following. Please do not be disruptive and restore your edits. If this is about the content of the rest of my edit, I can walk you through each and every change I made in it. It was a very considered edit. Thanks. Ss112 13:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you don't like that WP:USCHARTS deems the charts you added to those Daughtry song articles redundant, but I didn't come up with it. Please follow content guidelines that other editors have linked you to. These songs are not special enough to be exceptions to this guideline. Ss112 13:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mainstream Rock is one of the charts that's actually featured on Daughtry's discography wiki-page. I believe that is an actual creditable chart for Daughtry.

If you meant "credible", of course it is. It's published by Billboard. It's just that these charts have been put to discussions in the past and editors have come to the conclusion that Mainstream Rock, Alternative Songs/Airplay, Hard Rock Songs, et al are redundant to include in song articles' chart sections when a song has made it onto a broader chart that takes all these different metrics into account. Ss112 15:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reverted another edit you made to Dearly Beloved (Daughtry album) per WP:BRD since it was already reverted with an edit summary explaining why and you made no edit summary as to why you made it again. Per WP:BADCHARTS, iTunes charts should not be used because they are a single retailer. If you continue to edit war in this way, you could be blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 14:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UBS Arena[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at UBS Arena, you may be blocked from editing. Don't remove sourced information just because you think one sports entertainment circuit is better than the other. We're WP:NEUTRAL here. Nate (chatter) 01:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dearly Beloved Single List[edit]

Did you remove Hunger Strike and Changes are Coming from the single list? They were both played on SiriusXM Octane as singles with Changes Are Coming being the latest one. DaughtryLeave (talk) 19:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While they were played, Hunger Strike was a promotional single -- without even being a main track on Dearly Beloved, same with Lioness. Changes Are Coming could be the next single, there's no confirmation from Daughtry. User:CageToRattle (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then why has SiriusXM Octane been playing Changes are Coming since yesterday and why did they play Daughtry's cover of hunger strike a few konth's ago? DaughtryLeave (talk) 19:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I meant why was his cover of hunger strike played on there a few months ago. DaughtryLeave (talk) 20:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional single, wasn't intended to be a "Dearly Beloved" single. Believe it was to raise money for Hunger for Children. (talk) 22:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That still does not explain Changes are Coming as being played on there. They have this thing where they play music before the songs are aired on other stations. DaughtryLeave (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Hello can you please edit the crown jewel 2021 page because is says that Xavier woods is competing the the queens tournament thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.40.62.24 (talk) 17:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of biggest box-office bombs, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - wolf 18:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wonder Woman 1984 isn't a box office bomb, though? It was released on HBO Max in the US (while in select theaters). There's no way of knowing just how much it made. Therefore should be removed from the list. CageToRattle 20:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Once you've been reverted, you don't continue to make the same edit and argue via edit summaries. You take your concerns to the article talk page and discuss it with other editors. Thank you. - wolf 15:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of biggest box-office bombs, you may be blocked from editing. Betty Logan (talk) 05:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of video games notable for negative reception, you may be blocked from editing. Betty Logan (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Mann Mann (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Bloodline (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing. — Czello 14:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm late, but this seems to be a persistent issue that has reached a point where warnings don't work. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't edited anything this month?? So who's 'biography' did I edit?? CageToRattle (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The block is meant to prevent further violations of the biographies of living persons policy. These could else happen in any article, when you write about living persons – which most of your editing seems to be focused on. Your last editing about living people was at WrestleMania 38 (diff), a few days ago. If you haven't edited anything this month, your account has been compromised – good to know.
You had been warned about issues with your edits to biographical content about living people before, relatively often here on this page, but specifically in Oshwah's message from 03:18, 20 May 2021, to which you had responded that Special:Diff/1024096737 wasn't meant to be published on Wikipedia, but instead as a screenshot on Reddit. That alone already disqualifies you from editing biographical content at all, but you expectably proved this in your edit to the Vladimir Putin article. I'm surprised that you haven't been blocked immediately after this was noticed and reverted, but I have now fixed that oversight. Better late than never.
I'd normally ask you to find a different platform for your editing, as it isn't compatible with Wikipedia, but your treatment of living people displayed here is so far below reasonability that I should instead ask you to stop using the Internet until you've reached the minimum amount of maturity required to do so. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah. The Putin edit. Yeah, I remember doing that now. And I stand by it. Tell you what, unblock me and I'll do it again. More so than last time because Putin is a c*nt. Everyone knows it. And hopefully you do, too.
However the only one who is immature is you. You're defending Putin? 'Treatment of living people'? Putin has killed numerous people in the past month and a half. Yet you think you're some kind of keyboard warrior defending him?? Lmao. What a poor excuse of a life you lead. CageToRattle (talk) 21:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And you are done. Talk page access is revoked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]