User talk:Caleb Jones Safley

Caleb Jones Safley, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Caleb Jones Safley! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Awe thanks :3 Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 03:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021: Your Teahouse question[edit]

I see that your question at the Teahouse does not actually make sense in English. But please see WP:NOT anyway.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My bad it was supposed to be thanking host bot for a invitation/invite for going to a teahouse. Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 05:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to answer questions or add comments at Teahouse until you become more experienced. There is a group of question-answering Teahouse hosts who have been editors for years. David notMD (talk) 06:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aoght my bad dawg, No offense was intended so genuinely mean this as an apology for answering with lacking exp/xp. Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legit the fact that whatever the rocket instant? Insta? lunch whoever someone asked about at the teahouse... thus then was subbed to is not meant to backfire via making them misuse wikipedia it is— well they seem to be trynna build a youtube channel so they kinda can be related to... although I do not really feel need to advertise, et alone use an encyclopedia to do so as that would be ineffective at best and lacking at worst with little doubt a big potential of being sued or something. Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 02:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caleb Jones Safley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I understand now attempts of creating disgust is one reason Cordless larry blocked/banned, also— still trying to figure out what the name of each guideline is and what it means as I find it difficult to memorize all the guidelines/procedures for scripting/source? Editing. And that by putting even if it is with the sandbox- anything thatis not appetizing/potentially classifiable by others as gross- it potentially diminished decades of work regarding making wikimedia. To not waste your time to be able to revert vandalism is the reason why the unblock/unban is requested Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And for the "ytp its the great dolemite charlie brown" being on the carpetlice page as it is raunchy. Thus that was not a positive thing for any wiki project. Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 03:06, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tysvm for reading the case with your time even still so as— somehow feels kinda like some form of— "closure"? Dunno exactly what the word for it is. Caleb Jones Safley (talk) 05:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]