User talk:Caneoffire

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Caneoffire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 16:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have a question for you. Unless my article was created from my WP:YFA, can I deceive it without risk of deletion? Caneoffire (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All articles, regardless of how they are created, can be nominated for speedy deletion if they satisfy any of the criteria for speedy deletion (though in practice this is more commonly used for newly-created articles). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bigen One Push[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Bigen One Push requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bigen One Push[edit]

The article Bigen One Push has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable product lacking coverage in reliable sources. Only reference in the article is a Wordpress website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lego: The Adventures of Andre and Wally B.[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lego: The Adventures of Andre and Wally B., is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trivialist (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bigen One Push for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bigen One Push is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigen One Push until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rogue Robot[edit]

Hello Caneoffire,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rogue Robot for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 00:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on your articles[edit]

Hello, thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia!

Unfortunately, Wikipedia only takes articles on topics that are notable, meaning covered extensively in reliable sources. The article you've created don't really do this, because it is on the niche topic of a brief moment of a film. You might do better moving this to Pixar Wiki, or adding sources to improve articles that already exist on Wikipedia. Blythwood (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canderemy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canderemy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 07:20, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:MONGO may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Mongo is not an administrator. In any event, you should not be editing another user's page without a clear reason. Cahk (talk) 07:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics[edit]

Lyrics are copyrighted, and unless the lyrics were written and published before, say, 1923, they may not be reproduced on Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vince Miller[edit]

The article Vince Miller has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JTtheOG (talk) 04:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vince Miller[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Vince Miller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DAJF (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bigen One Push. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vince Miller. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 06:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Vince Miller, you may be blocked from editing. DAJF (talk) 07:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. I ignore that article. Caneoffire (talk) 07:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vince Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A quote for you[edit]

We used all of your Mouseketools, everybody say SUPER CHEERS. 203.111.224.33 (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block all bots[edit]

I too, become all blocks their messages. Caneoffire (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP!!! Article is insulting[edit]

Uh oh, the article was in their trouble. My article seems disgrace but I don't take care of this, please help me this article due to WP:AIV invasion. User talk:Caneoffire 11:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Synthelabobabe21 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]