User talk:Carbon-16/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Signature in an AfD
That has got to be the best laugh I've had at an AfD listing in ages. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 08:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
vandal warnings
I only use warnings #1 through #4 on the vandal warning page. I honestly don't feel the need to be nice to newbies who blatantly vandalize, blank or delete. Desertsky85451 22:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
NPOV
You responded to someone at the help desk that an article on a subject they're involved in could be "ridden with NPOV". I wish it was! NPOV is neutral point of view, which is what we are looking for. You meant to say POV. - Mgm|(talk) 09:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Take-Along Thomas
You can't just blank pages like that. Return the page the way it was! Thank you. BigThomasFan
Stubs
Hello,
Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.
Thanks! Ksbrown 22:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Faggot!
Hello, Faggot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --216.164.192.189 19:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- The anon has been left a mild warning. If he continues, I'll block him. – ClockworkSoul 19:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Reference desk comment
I know the question likely wasn't serious, and I know you were just having a bit of fun, but we need to avoid a) insulting users on the reference desk or b) being too chatty there. I think this comment goes too far; would you consider removing it, please? -- SCZenz 20:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Refdesk is serious business. --Wooty Woot? contribs 20:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing it. Yes, I and a number of other users would like the ref desk to be a little more serious than it has been. You may also be interested to know that the user expressed concern about the initial response to his question. -- SCZenz 20:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Point taken, but I doubt the guy was looking for a serious answer. If he was..I don't think he understands what he's asking. --Wooty Woot? contribs 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wooty, your attitude about that guy contrasts WP:AGF. --ElectricEye (talk) 02:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not going to get in an argument with you about "assuming good faith" over an anon asking about how he can get an arranged marriage and then calling me a "faggot" on my talk page. --Wooty Woot? contribs 04:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Point taken, but I doubt the guy was looking for a serious answer. If he was..I don't think he understands what he's asking. --Wooty Woot? contribs 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing it. Yes, I and a number of other users would like the ref desk to be a little more serious than it has been. You may also be interested to know that the user expressed concern about the initial response to his question. -- SCZenz 20:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I reverted the lists as I see no real reason to delete them. However, I put the first section into a table and removed the external links to the photos. Tell me what you think please. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
A message from a banned user
Are you saying that some sort of "assumption of risk" thing wouldn't apply? I mean, its not like I misled her or anything. Pynopoulous 07:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
His familiarity with Wikipedia (posting to the Administrator's Noticeboard on his second edit, leaving a message on Cyde's talk page on his third) and the fact that he seems ask naive yet trollish questions point to him being a sock of a banned user.--§hanel 02:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)