User talk:Carbon-16/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Carbon-16. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Signature in an AfD
That has got to be the best laugh I've had at an AfD listing in ages. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 08:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
vandal warnings
I only use warnings #1 through #4 on the vandal warning page. I honestly don't feel the need to be nice to newbies who blatantly vandalize, blank or delete. Desertsky85451 22:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
NPOV
You responded to someone at the help desk that an article on a subject they're involved in could be "ridden with NPOV". I wish it was! NPOV is neutral point of view, which is what we are looking for. You meant to say POV. - Mgm|(talk) 09:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on usertalk page. --Wooty Woot? | contribs 18:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Take-Along Thomas
You can't just blank pages like that. Return the page the way it was! Thank you. BigThomasFan
- Rep. on usertalk page. --Wooty Woot? | contribs 19:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Stubs
Hello,
Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.
Thanks! Ksbrown 22:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Faggot!
Hello, Faggot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --216.164.192.189 19:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- The anon has been left a mild warning. If he continues, I'll block him. – ClockworkSoul 19:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Reference desk comment
I know the question likely wasn't serious, and I know you were just having a bit of fun, but we need to avoid a) insulting users on the reference desk or b) being too chatty there. I think this comment goes too far; would you consider removing it, please? -- SCZenz 20:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Refdesk is serious business. --Wooty Woot? contribs 20:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing it. Yes, I and a number of other users would like the ref desk to be a little more serious than it has been. You may also be interested to know that the user expressed concern about the initial response to his question. -- SCZenz 20:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Point taken, but I doubt the guy was looking for a serious answer. If he was..I don't think he understands what he's asking. --Wooty Woot? contribs 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wooty, your attitude about that guy contrasts WP:AGF. --ElectricEye (talk) 02:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not going to get in an argument with you about "assuming good faith" over an anon asking about how he can get an arranged marriage and then calling me a "faggot" on my talk page. --Wooty Woot? contribs 04:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Point taken, but I doubt the guy was looking for a serious answer. If he was..I don't think he understands what he's asking. --Wooty Woot? contribs 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing it. Yes, I and a number of other users would like the ref desk to be a little more serious than it has been. You may also be interested to know that the user expressed concern about the initial response to his question. -- SCZenz 20:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I reverted the lists as I see no real reason to delete them. However, I put the first section into a table and removed the external links to the photos. Tell me what you think please. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
A message from a banned user
Are you saying that some sort of "assumption of risk" thing wouldn't apply? I mean, its not like I misled her or anything. Pynopoulous 07:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
His familiarity with Wikipedia (posting to the Administrator's Noticeboard on his second edit, leaving a message on Cyde's talk page on his third) and the fact that he seems ask naive yet trollish questions point to him being a sock of a banned user.--§hanel 02:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)