User talk:Carbon-16/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Carbon-16. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Carbon-16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers T 20:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Hangon
I've been putting that tag on there as the bot blanks my stuff sooner than I can write articles for the disputed content. Thanks for your patience. Chris 09:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Jenny Morris
I've noticed that you've marked that page for deletion. Can it be possible to vote to change it to a redirect to the band Innosense? I was actually considering doing that myself. -WarthogDemon 04:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to put it up for AfD, considering the consensus was to delete rather than redirect. Let's see how this goes first. --Wooty Woot? contribs 04:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. One more odd question. Is it poor form to vote on one's own article then? (Though in this case it'd be Redirect or Delete.) -WarthogDemon 04:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it is, but go ahead anyway. I don't think it'll survive (or it'll be redirected), I just didn't want to slap a speedy on it or do anything hasty without getting consensus. Thanks for fixing the AfD. --Wooty Woot? contribs 04:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. And oops I think I misread what you said DIdn't mean to act in poor form there. >_> -WarthogDemon 05:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it is, but go ahead anyway. I don't think it'll survive (or it'll be redirected), I just didn't want to slap a speedy on it or do anything hasty without getting consensus. Thanks for fixing the AfD. --Wooty Woot? contribs 04:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. One more odd question. Is it poor form to vote on one's own article then? (Though in this case it'd be Redirect or Delete.) -WarthogDemon 04:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
BoyChat AFD
The boychat page has been changing very rapidly recently since the pedos got wind of the AFD. Regardless they seem to have improved and added references (I added references too). Would you might taking another look. You had a weak delete but now there are even Canadian govt reports on online pedo activity which dedicate numerous pages to the website.
Oh and thanks for the usertalk message previously --Quirex 19:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
yo
ur pretty young rofl
Blood Sport
This regards your recent edit of my edit on Blood Sport. I'll leave the first phrase alone until I find a less wordy way of putting in the information as I admit your version reads better. But Salt has been dead for about 70 years and he no longer believes anything. He believed all sorts of notions when he was alive. Perhaps you'd be interested in helping correct the gross POV bias in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trilobitealive (talk • contribs)
- Oh, my mistake. I'll be on Wikibreak until sometime in January, but when I get back, I'll gladly help address it. --Wooty Woot? contribs 22:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
81.145.241.44
I'm trying to figure out why that user burst out like that... Do you have any idea what's going on? V-Man737 23:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For people reading, diff diff diff can't get enough. I don't know. User might have been bitten, but it's more likely simple trolling (the "heil hitler" at the end prompted my choice to remove it). --Wooty Woot? contribs 23:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Weird edit
Thanks for bringing that weird edit to my attention. Please review my explanation at my talk and add whatever you want to aid my understanding as to what happened. --hydnjo talk 23:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Give someone more than two hours to correct the situation with the text on the article before you blank the page. Thank you. --Mhking 02:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah. "Replaced" -- I misunderstood the text on WP:C. My apologies. --Mhking 03:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
How can I help?--CJ King 00:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Anything you think is necessary. Right now, I'd like to get the program up and running and noticed by the general community. I've proposed some new guidelines and I'm not sure what the opinion of the community is, so I'm hesitant to add them - feedback would be good. Finally, making the page should perhaps look more official, and the template discussed on the talk page needs to be made. --Wooty Woot? contribs 01:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
RD edit
My comments, which you removed in this edit, were a response to a previous answer. If you feel that something is uncivil, you can post a note on my page or below the response. You don't just delete part of people's answers. BenC7 02:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Calling someone's ideas "laughable" is incivil, and blatantly incivil comments (with no underlying argument, aka "they're uncivil not to make a point") should be deleted. Posting anything in response would simply be starting an inappropriate discussion on the RD. I apologize if you felt slighted by a deletion, if there is a next time I will bring it up on your talkpage. --Wooty Woot? contribs 03:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)