User talk:Catmich2022

License tagging for File:Intuit-logo 230px.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Intuit-logo 230px.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasan Goodarzi (October 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Linkedin.com is never a reliable source please replace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasan Goodarzi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful call out, @Theroadislong. The LinkedIn mentions have been removed. Thank you! Catmich2022 (talk) 22:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NPdigital! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

Hello NPdigital. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NPdigital. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NPdigital|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~~~~ Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Theroadislong. My apologies. The template

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

has been added to our user page. Additionally, the connection between NP digital and Intuit has been sited.

I appreciate your help with this, Theroadislong. After much research, I believe we have made our intentions clear and ensure they align with Wikipedia's paid editors guidelines for publication.

Please let me know if there is anything else we must do. NPdigital (talk) 19:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here.

The new username that you use (either by just creating a new account, or having your current one changed) must represent only yourself as an individual, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Either method that you decide to use in order to use a different username is up to you, but you may prefer to just change your current username to one that complies with our username policy if you've already made contributions using this account. Having your account's username changed means that your past contributions (if any), settings, user pages, scripts, and other items will move with you and over to your new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can check here for a list of already-taken usernames, as well as search through that list to see if the username you'd like to choose is available (just look at the list of users that appear in the results - if the account that is listed on the very top not match your search, it is available to be taken).

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this username block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Catmich2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Catmich2022 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My username implied shared use and was in violation of Wikipedias username policy. This is not a shared account, and my name is now in reflection of that. NPdigital (talk) 19:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have renamed and unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Phil beat me to it :) but I was also going to add that your user page has a template meant for article talk pages, use {{paid}} on your user page. 331dot (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, @331dot and @PhilKnight. I appreciate you both for educating me and helping me through this process. Catmich2022 (talk) 20:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

An article you recently created, StackAdapt, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, first place {{AfC submission|T}} atop the article, publish, then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please note COI articles are recommended to go through the WP:AfC process as well. Thanks, Silikonz💬 17:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WatchBox (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see this guide for adding citations and needs to be rewritten. Things like "Business offerings" is not acceptable and much of this is a list rather than prose.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WatchBox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are notable but the draft needs too comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Right now it is written as if it the company's website rather than an encyclopedia article. Generally the Wikipedia community expects paid editors to already understand Wikipedia's standards and to be able to write and source a draft appropriately. What the company says or wants to say about themselves is not relevant. S0091 (talk) 21:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of StackAdapt[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on StackAdapt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning on paid editing[edit]

Paid editors are required to follow the conflict of interest guidelines. This includes that, rather than directly creating or editing articles for which you have been paid or have other conflicts of interest, you are expected to first have any proposed creations or edits reviewed by a non-conflicted editor. At StackAdapt, you created a paid article directly in mainspace, and then even after a non-conflicted editor moved it to a draft, moved it back to mainspace yourself. You must refrain from doing this again. In the future, instead of doing this, create a draft and request review by articles for creation. If you intend to suggest edits to an existing article, suggest them on the talk page, then add {{request edit}} to flag your proposal for review. Continued violations of these policies are likely to lead to a block from editing without further warning. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medable has been accepted[edit]

Medable, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Newystats (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please improve this article by moving the references to the end of each statement, rather than straight after the year. Newystats (talk) 11:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Connected Contributor[edit]

@Newystats - I would love to. Thank you so much for your thoughtful help. I appreciate you! I will make changes as requested asap. Catmich2022 (talk) 18:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WatchBox (April 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only reference that meets WP:ORGCRIT is Bloomberg (potentially as I did not go beyond the paywall).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WatchBox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Medable for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sasan Goodarzi[edit]

Hello, Catmich2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sasan Goodarzi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sasan Goodarzi[edit]

Hello, Catmich2022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sasan Goodarzi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Hi Catmich2022! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at ChromeOS that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 00:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the clarification. Apologies! I will keep this in mind going forward. Catmich2022 (talk) 14:45, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:StackAdapt[edit]

Hello, Catmich2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:StackAdapt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:StackAdapt[edit]

Hello, Catmich2022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "StackAdapt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:WatchBox[edit]

Hello, Catmich2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:WatchBox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:WatchBox[edit]

Hello, Catmich2022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "WatchBox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]