User talk:Cbratbyrudd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
I noticed you've made one or more edits to women's biographies. Should you be interested in helping to redress the balance of articles about women, you might wish to consider joining our Women in Red project. Less than 18% of biographies here are about women - and you could help us increase this!
Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) This automatically inserts your name and the date. If you get stuck, please see our help pages. If you can't find what you are looking for there, feel free to ask at the Teahouse or at the Women in Red project's Talk Page. Alternatively, contact me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help you. Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 09:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Tisa Bryant (July 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 01:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cbratbyrudd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 01:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tisa Bryant (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 05:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tressie Mcmillan Cottom (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TJH2018 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TJH2018talk 16:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamara Winfrey Harris (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TJH2018 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TJH2018talk 16:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tressie Mcmillan Cottom has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tressie Mcmillan Cottom. Thanks! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tressie McMillan Cottom (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariame Kaba (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:54, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nia Wilson (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 16:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nia Wilson (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Tressie McMillan Cottom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copy of Draft:Tressie McMilla Cottom that hs been declined due to lack of independent references to establish notabiltiy. It is an abuse of the draft system to ignore it and just copy into mainspace when the article is declined. You are free to continue editing the draft to get it into an acceptable state.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 11:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just letting you know I removed a couple of the categories you added to the Katharina Paulus article because they are not categories that go in mainspace articles. I'm referring to the ones about importance level, and needing an infobox. They are maintenance categories, and I left an edit summary saying I would move the infobox one to the talk page, but when I looked at talk page, I'm not sure how to go about doing that. It's not added directly like category in article. It looks like it needs the wikiproject women template, and can be added to the template but I'm really not sure. I shouldn't have said I would move it before actually checking first, but I figured it would be added the same, so I'm sorry I can't fix the problem, but leaving a maintenance category in the article is not the solution. Cmr08 (talk) 20:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cbratbyrudd. Thanks for your work on Hanne Nielsen -- I've merged it into Havarti (somewhat hastily -- thought I was going from the back of the queue), as it doesn't look like there's a significant amount of RS biographical info available on her (da:Hanne Nielsen is also brief). If there is only going to be a max of a para or so, I believe that she should continue to be redirected and covered at Havarti. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 21:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Desmond Napoles for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desmond Napoles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond Napoles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nia Wilson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 02:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tressie McMillan Cottom for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tressie McMillan Cottom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tressie McMillan Cottom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 02:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC) == Proposed deletion of Nia Wilson == [reply]

Notice

The article Nia Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

prod is better

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JC7V-constructive zone 04:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

I suggest you move Nia Wilson into draft space before it gets speedied. I see Nia Wilson was rejected twice recently by AFC. Move it to draft space, if she doesn't get enough stand alone long term coverage in the next few weeks, you should merge it into an existing article as stated by another editor. I appreciate the hard work your doing . JC7V-constructive zone 04:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Murder of Nia Wilson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Murder of Nia Wilson. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nia Wilson. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nia Wilson. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 05:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's a pretty awful template message. Speedied because renames should be done via pagemove to preserve history rather than via cut and paste. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 05:51, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article[edit]

Your Nia Wilson article is coming along nicely. If you need any help on your article, don't hestitate to ask me. Good luck JC7V-constructive zone 02:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

Hi, yes I know a fellow editor who is much more experienced than I who can give you a lot of good pointers about your Nia Wilson article. EricEnfermero .I fight vandalism with him on recent change patrol and he is a member of the WikiProject_Crime_and_Criminal_Biography. You can go to his talk page and ask him what you asked me on my talk page and he will help you out. Good luck. JC7V-constructive zone 06:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ebony Flowers[edit]

Please stop reverting this article to add her in parent categories. She is ALREADY IN THESE CATEGORIES. The category Category:African-American women writers is a SUBSET of parent categories Category:Writers, Category:Women writers, and Category:American writers. The same way Category:1955 births is a subset of Category:1950s births, Category:20th-century births and Category:Births. Do you see what I am saying? There is a reason we create specific categories. Thank you. МандичкаYO 😜 17:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the below citations calling out the issues with using subsets: https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2013/04/29/wikipedia-women-problem/ https://theconversation.com/why-wikipedia-often-overlooks-stories-of-women-in-history-92555 https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/why-wikipedia-often-overlooks-stories-of-women-in-history cbratbyruddYO 😜 17:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you have a problem with how Wikipedia categorizes then that is truly your issue. Do not edit against policy to make a point. You are not accomplishing anything with your protest categorization and you are certainly not improving Wikipedia. Spend your time doing something constructive like creating new biographies and adding sources to those at risk of being deleted. You're going to get yourself banned very quickly. МандичкаYO 😜 22:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Мандичка: – Please note that Category:African-American women writers is declared a non-diffusing subcategory of Category:American writers, meaning that it includes writers that can also be found in the parent category.  --Lambiam 08:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
also its not good form to copy another user's sig JC7V-constructive zone 17:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

to Cbr, I suggest you use the talk page of the Wikiproject for women's writers to come up with a consensus about this. It is a big issue. Edit warring will solve nothing. JC7V-constructive zone 17:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ebony Flowers, you may be blocked from editing. I have explained to you directly why this is not correct. Please learn about how WP:Categories work and stop your disruptive editing.

Reply[edit]

to Cbratbyrudd, Some ways people deal with edit disputes are: Article talk page, if that doesn't work there is always Dispute Resolution, there is also edit warring noticeboards. JC7V-constructive zone 22:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest you drop the stick with the editor you are warring against right now and not edit war them. Use the talk page of the article in question to seek consensus, seek out other editors opinions who belong to WikiProject Women's writers to discuss your purpose changes. Don't personally attack the warring editor (even if you are right). Rosie was a Wikimedia person of the year a few years ago and a project member of for Women's Writers, she can help you in your edit warring issue.JC7V-constructive zone 23:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment! I haven’t done any edits since you posted the first edit warring thing. Not sure why the other editor posted it again.

I also left a message for Rosie on her talk page about the issue!

A page you started (Katharine A. Morey) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Katharine A. Morey, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Katharine A. Morey. Note that there is an error with footnote #2. Meanwhile, you might consider expanding the article with more information on her life story, date of birth, date of death etc. if such info is available. Good luck!

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amanda Daflos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda Daflos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Daflos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WiR Monthly achievements[edit]

Hi there, Cbratbyrudd, and thanks for adding so many new biographies to our Monthly achievements listings. As you may have noticed, I've been through several of them, adding categories and Defaultsort. Defaultsort allows you to set a person's family name as the basis for category sorting, etc. You'll find it in the Wiki markup options at the bottom of pages in edit mode. Maybe you could also add a WiR tag such as {{WIR-00-2018}} to your article talk pages. This will ensure that any pages tagged for deletion will be displayed on the WiR main page. I've added it on Talk:Amanda Daflos. Keep up the good work. You are doing very well.--Ipigott (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Chiyo Miyako[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chiyo Miyako. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Andrew D. (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Writer's Barnstar
For not only creating great articles but creating articles about notable women writers which this site hasn't had an excess of. Keep up the great work. JC7V-constructive zone 19:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Dalfos 2 Suggestion[edit]

Hey Cb, if your Amanda Dalfos article is to be merged into the Los Angeles Innovation team article, I have taken the liberty of creating a draft for the Los Angeles Innovation team for you. I am in the process of merging some of the Amanda Dalfos info into the draft and you can take over if you want. Here is the link to the draft: Draft:Los_Angeles_Innovation_Team. You are doing such a great job with your articles and I actually enjoy reading them because they are well written, fun to read and interesting. You should really get into DYKs.JC7V-constructive zone 17:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


[[User:JC7V7DC5768 thanks for letting me know! Can you let me know what DYKs are and how I get involved?

User:cbratbyrudd[[User talk:cbratbyrudd| 17:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you can find out about Did You Knows in this link: Wikipedia:Did_you_know. That link can tell you more than I could. BTW, if you want to 'ping' a user, follow this advice: follow the advice here. I am getting the hang of pings too and it's so confusing. JC7V-constructive zone 18:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cbratbyrudd, I've been doing DYKs for awhile. You can ask me for help or to review one for you once you get into it. I'm a Women in Red editor. I also just did some work on your Pat North Ommert article to try to help improve it. I'm having a tough time finding additional sources in Internet searches. I have access to newspapers.com and the newspapers archive sites through Wikipedia so I'll try searching there next. I think she may be notable just due to the Hall of Fame induction, though. Also, you should sign your comments at the end. Use four tildas to do so. You can do it manually, but there's actually a button underneath this editing window that will do it when you click it. I do mostly rodeo editing but have been known to do other things do. Happy Trails! dawnleelynn(talk) 23:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hallie Lieberman) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hallie Lieberman, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Hallie Lieberman.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Brittany Ashley[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Brittany Ashley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Ashley .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Natureium (talk) 01:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for you[edit]

Hey Cbratbyrudd, I found a source from Variety for your Brittany Ashley article (google the term 'why i left buzzfeed","brittany"). You can also use this reliable source search engine to help you in the future with your articles. for that reliable source search enginge, you type your article subject into the box and then you click the blue button (with the magnfying glass on it) and you'll be able to find reliable sources for whatever subject you want. Good luck Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).JC7V-constructive zone 17:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi JC7V-constructive zone Thanks for this information!

Notable poetry[edit]

The fact that a performance of a poem is available at Button Poetry does not in-and-of-itself make that poem notable. The inclusion of that in multiple bios (Imani Cezanne, Desireé Dallagiacomo, Javon Johnson (poet)) feels very promotional for Button Poetry. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi power~enwiki thanks for your message. I do not have any connection to Button Poetry other than being a MFA in Creative Writing and a self-proclaimed poetry nerd. Everything is cited. I am merely creating poetry articles for notable poets/poetry organizations whose work I have come across in my own studies. Most of these folks are quite famous in the poetry world (it's honestly a little shocking they don't already have pages) cbratbyrudd 20:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Aziza Barnes) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Aziza Barnes, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have just reviewed your article. Is it possible to get Aziza's year of birth? Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Not A Cult requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Not A Cult shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toddst1 thanks for your comment--not trying to edit war at all. The revert requested some more sourcing, I added the sourcing per the request. Please see the editing history. cbratbyrudd1 (cbratbyrudd) 19:09, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lacy M. Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scribner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018 at Women in Red[edit]

September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!



New: Women currently in academics Women + Law Geofocus: Hispanic countries

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Check it out: Monthly achievement initiative

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in September.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Maxine McCormick for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maxine McCormick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxine McCormick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:37, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note you use the singular they in Skyler Cooper. While some genderqueer persons prefer it, it seems a bit clunky in this article, and seems contrary to how the subject is written about and self identifies: most of this sources use "her", while Cooper notes he has used both "he" and "she" pronouns in the past, but now identifies as "he" and with masculine pronouns. Thus, unless there is compelling reason not to, per MOS:GENDERID masculine pronouns should be used as consistently as possible, avoiding the potential grammatical confusion of "they", "zhe", etc. What do you think? --Animalparty! (talk) 05:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi --Animalparty! thank you so much for this note! I was struggling while writing for this exact reason. My first idea was to maybe just avoid the pronoun and specifically use the name? It was unclear to me which pronoun Cooper uses and so I went with "they" due to the variant pronouns in the articles. I would appreciate any feedback. I didn't want to misgender so went for neutral. cbratbyrudd (talk) 05:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For expert advice and style guidance, you might solicit opinions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. Unless there is more recent evidence to the contrary, I think "he/him" would be acceptable, with a simple in-text note explaining alternate or previous usages for clarity and context. One issue might involve deprecated pronouns in direct quotes: in this case a stylistic fix like Smith wrote that "[his] performance was superb" might be used if the original quote used "her". --Animalparty! (talk) 06:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, just FYI, you can ping users simply by using the {{reply}} or {{ping}} template and the plain unformatted username, e.g. @Cbratbyrudd: or @Animalparty:. Cheers! --Animalparty! (talk) 06:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Juanita Tomayo Lott[edit]

Hi, I'm Rosguill. Cbratbyrudd, thanks for creating Juanita Tomayo Lott!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've marked it as reviewed so that the page gets indexed by search engines, but I've also identified some things that could be improved about the article. In particular, the article's lead needs to be rewritten, and it needs more citations to secondary-sources mentioning Lott. You may also want to consider adding a section listing Lott's notable published works.

Thanks for helping improve wikipedia!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Rosguilltalk 19:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in study[edit]

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 19:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sophia Hall[edit]

Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Cbratbyrudd, thanks for creating Sophia Hall!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. For a statement like "she ran for retention in 2016," particularly for a BLP, it's better to have a more reliable source than a wiki that can be edited by anyone. Also, it would be nice if the article could be placed in some categories. Besides that, it's looking really great!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 16:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citations in lists of publications[edit]

Hi Cbratbyrudd, thanks for all the work you're doing. I came across your article Rebecca Nagle. One quick suggestion: in the list of publications, it might be better to use e.g. {{cite book}} directly rather than to list the work and add a reference at the end. It makes the links and detail that little bit more accessible and it has the handy side-effect of not making the list of references look so primary. I got the same advice about an article I wrote a while back and I think was an improvement. All the best, › Mortee talk 21:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mortee! Thanks for this information! I have been away for a bit and will try to make this update!Cbratbyrudd (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thank you. Welcome back! › Mortee talk 13:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Carolyn Baxter) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Carolyn Baxter, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Due to this being a BLP, could you source the "Baxter is a member of the United Federation for Teachers. She played the conga and bass" statement with an inline citation?

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 23:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rebecca Nagle) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Rebecca Nagle, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Rebecca Nagle. Note that another editors has called for some crucial improvements, particularly more citations to verify statements about Nagle's life. See WP:BLP for pointers. Good luck.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hailie Sahar) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hailie Sahar, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Hailie Sahar. I recommended finding more material (with sources) on her activities outside of acting, as other occupations are introduced in the lead section. Good luck.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Britteney Black Rose Kapri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandy Ho (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanhe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zanhe (talk) 21:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vilissa Thompson (September 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alyesha Wise) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Alyesha Wise, Cbratbyrudd!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Alyesha Wise.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018 at Women in Red[edit]

Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!



New: Clubs Science fiction + fantasy STEM The Mediterranean

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sandy Ho has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandy Ho. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tressie McMillan Cottom (October 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 09:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get ready for November with Women in Red![edit]

Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives



New: Religion Deceased politicians Asia

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamalika Chanda (October 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marisa Franco has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marisa Franco. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 14:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marisa Franco has been accepted[edit]

Marisa Franco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamara Winfrey Harris has been accepted[edit]

Tamara Winfrey Harris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SportingFlyer talk 09:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: The Months of African Cinema Continues….[edit]

Greetings!

Thank you very much for signing up to participate in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 200 articles created in over seven (7) languages! The figures soars to up to a thousand, if Wikidata entries are included. Furthermore, there have been about 5 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians in different countries across the world to create articles about African(a) cinema!

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

  • Article suggestions can be found here. You can also add to this list.
  • Some notable reliable sources for African cinema can be found here. Again, this list needs expansion.
  • Interested in Wikidata translation? check out the Occupation Drive, which is being led by Wiki Loves Women, in support of the contest and the project!
  • Please remember to list articles you have created or improved in the Article Achievements section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked.

Thank you once again for being part of this global event!

Kind regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018 at Women in Red[edit]

The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.



New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I'

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
[reply]

Deletion discussion about Matias Viegener[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Matias Viegener should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matias Viegener .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

scope_creepTalk 13:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Kees[edit]

Hello! I just noticed that the article you created at Mary Kees is superfluous, as it duplicated the material in the much larger article Mary Dixon Kies. it seems like a redirect from Mary Kees to Mary Dixon Kies is in oreder; do you know how to do that?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 13:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I figured out how to do it and placed the redirect.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 13:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108


Happy New Year from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

January events: Women of War and Peace Play!

January geofocus: Caucasus

New, year-long initiative: Suffrage

Continuing global initiative: #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list
Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list
Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0)

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfroCine: Thank You![edit]

Greetings!

The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon was concluded on 30 November 2018, and we've had amazing results. Over 570 articles were created across 8 language-Wikipedias. 7 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians were organized across different parts of the world.

All our winners have been recognized and you can check the complete list here.

For a pilot event, all our expectations were surpassed and we have you to thank for that. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! Thank you for helping to fix African content gaps on Wikipedia! We hope to see more of your participation in future AfroCine events and activities. Please remember to signup on the main WikiProject participants page, in order to get updated with these activities.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111


Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

February events: Social Workers Black Women

February geofocus: Ancient World

Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

Join the conversations on our talkpage:


Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

March 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113


Happy Women's History Month from Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:
March: Art+Feminism & #VisibleWikiWomen
Geofocus: Francophone Women
Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman


Other ways you can participate:
Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage
Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tisa Bryant[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tisa Bryant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 12:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muriel Leung[edit]

I see you are adding many references to Muriel Leung, but the article needs to show independent, secondary coverage of the type that would demonstrate a pass of WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Announcements of her readings, or her student bio, don't actually count toward establishing notability. When I tagged the article for notability I also opened a discussion on the article talk page, so I hope that you are willing to work collaboratively there. Bakazaka (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bakazaka (talk), Thanks for your message! I am currently working on it and trying to add sources, seems like we were maybe editing at the same time and some things got deleted? I added two more interviews with the author and am adding more as we speak. Any suggestions are welcome! thanks for your help. Cbratbyrudd (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vilissa Thompson[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vilissa Thompson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117


Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Notice

The article Daniel Andrew Gross and Steven Goldstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:1E/WP:BIO1E the marriage itself is not notable, the notable event is the change in the column title and practices of the New York Times, and that isn't notable outside of the New York Times, so a low notability event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is done as a courtesy; I did not propose the deletion of the aforementioned article. Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 03:53, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May you join this month's editathons from WiR![edit]

May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121


Hello and welcome to the May events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Notice

The article Edwin Bodney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient evidence for notability as a writer or otherwise

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June events with WIR[edit]

June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125


Check out what's happening in June at Women in Red:

Virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

July events from Women in Red![edit]

July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128


Check out what's happening in July at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Initiatives we support:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amanda Daflos[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amanda Daflos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131


Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135


Check out what's happening in September at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sandy Ho[edit]

Hello, Cbratbyrudd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandy Ho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October Events from Women in Red[edit]

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140


Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October![edit]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019 at Women in Red[edit]

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143


Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December events with WIR[edit]

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147


Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

January 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

February with Women in Red[edit]

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

May 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166


May offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

July 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

August 2020 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September Women in Red edithons[edit]

Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

October editathons from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest![edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November![edit]

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December with Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A New Year With Women in Red![edit]

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

August Editathons at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

October 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211


Online events:


Special event:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest![edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

November 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November![edit]

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

January 2022 Women in Red[edit]

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

February with Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

March editathons[edit]

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

May Women in Red events[edit]

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June events from Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in July 2022[edit]

Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in August 2022[edit]

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022[edit]

Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241


Online events:


Request for help:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2022[edit]

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red November 2022[edit]

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red December 2022[edit]

WiR Women who died in 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
    like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red January 2023[edit]

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023[edit]

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2023[edit]

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2023[edit]

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2023[edit]

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023[edit]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red July 2023[edit]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2023[edit]

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Something to keep in mind when you create new articles[edit]

Thank you for your work on the Koko Da Doll article!

However, the way that you attempted to add it to the Women in Red and LGBT Studies WikiProjects (there is no "LGBT" project, all LGBT-related articles just go under LGBT Studies) did not successfully alert either project. Next time you create an article, you can add it to the LGBT and WiR projects by:

1: Clicking "Edit source" in the top right corner of the article's talk page

2: Placing the text {{WikiProject LGBT Studies}} or {{WikiProject Women in Red}} at the top of the talk page. Do not sign this by adding four tildes in a row. QuietCicada (talk) 00:11, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women In Red[edit]

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2023[edit]

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Koko Da Doll for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Koko Da Doll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koko Da Doll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SparklyNights 19:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023[edit]

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red December 2023[edit]

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024[edit]

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

Women in Red February 2024[edit]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024[edit]

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2024[edit]

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2024[edit]

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]