User talk:Cczeto

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cczeto, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Michael Levine (author), seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Cczeto. You have new messages at Grayfell's talk page.
Message added 23:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Grayfell (talk) 23:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Cczeto. You have new messages at Grayfell's talk page.
Message added 01:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Grayfell (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just needing understanding[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi there, I have been trying to edit Michael Levine (author) page and still get errors. I have read all the documentations and I still can't seem to get it right. So, I would like get this article or page in the right standing with Wikipedia. All I am asking is: What is wrong with the current page? What do I need to do to make sure the content is right? Or the link? I don't want it to be a promotional plug and I know I've made that mistake before.

I was using these pages as a guideline (while reading the documentation - those documentations are kinda hard to follow)Kim Westwood and Erica Wagner just to make sure I am doing this right.

So please help me out with a clear understanding.

Thank you so much for you work and service Wikipedia is a wonderful source, cczeto Cczeto (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content should be based on reliable sources that are independent of the subject, such as newspaper articles about Levine or published reviews of his books. Of the article's current sources, the first two are his publishers, who have a commercial interest in promoting his work. The third is an interview with Levine, and Levine is not an independent source for infomration about himself. The fourth is a press release, not subject to any editorial oversight and not reliable. For comparison, while the articles you picked as examples aren't quite as good as could be desired (you may want to check out our Good Articles instead), the Kim Westwood article cites The Canberra Times, the Sydney Morning Herald and ABC Radio's Book Show, among others. Huon (talk) 19:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Huon Huon (talk)I am not sure how to respond so I hope I am doing this right. Cczeto (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Help desk[edit]

Just so you know, I've answered your question over at the help desk. Hopefully it will be of some assistance to you.

Good luck. :-) Kurtis ^(talk) 20:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Levine/Fagan[edit]

Hello again. I've removed your recent addition to Michael Levine (author) because it had a significant statement about a living person, but did not include a source. If David T. Fagan went into default, that needs to be clearly explained and verifiable (WP:V). More information about this can be found at WP:BLP. As an additional note, the Wikipedia manual of style (WP:MOS) recommends against using Mr., Mrs., or Ms.. There are exceptions, (WP:LASTNAME) but this doesn't look like one of them. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]