User talk:Cdg428

Welcome!

Hello, Cdg428, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Parsley Man (talk) 17:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Milonica. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bill Nye Saves the World have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 23:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Nye

Your edits on Bill Nye were reverted, as these reviews on rotten tomato where public reviews and not critic reviews and so are considered to be user generate content, the reasons are stated on the talk page of that article.Pepe.is.great (talk) 01:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Morty C-137

Knock it off. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Cdg428 (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Me being a sock puppet

This section is dedicated to discussion about the fact that I am a sock puppet. Cdg428 (talk) 16:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who's accusing you.Pepe.is.great (talk) 22:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Morty. He has correctly observed that you and I are the same person. Cdg428 (talk) 23:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very good he must be very intelligent to have work that out so quickly.Pepe.is.great (talk) 09:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 00:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cdg428 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah. I'm pretty sure I don't even really need to provide a reason. Surely most people are not so dense as the admin who blocked me. But I guess if I were to provide a reason it would be: Irony. It exists. Cdg428 (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cdg428 (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A fairly cursory glance through my post history prior to this Bill Nye debacle will also debunk the frog out of this admin's completely absurd claim that I am "not here to" blah blah blah.

I thank other admins in advance for seeing basic sense, and I am sorry that you will have been forced to take any time out of your day to deal with such BS. In retrospect, I do suppose I have learned a lesson about just how easy it is to set off some random humorless anal fool admin who might do some nonsense such as this. Going forward therefore I will tread more carefully. Cdg428 (talk) 02:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OHHHHHHH... I get it. I see what happened.

HEY BLACK FLAG:

Number one, you might want to educate yourself on what a pariah Morty had been making of himself in the eyes of several moderators, before you so blindly jump to such an extreme move at that fool's whim.

Secondly, ANOTHER ADMIN HANDLED THE SITUATION LIKE TEN MINUTES AFTER MORTY POSTED ON YOUR PAGE, AND SEVERAL HOURS BEFORE YOUR RIDICULOUS ESCAPADE. YOU CAN SEE THAT ON THIS VERY PAGE.

I'm sorry for yelling, but you don't seem to look too deeply into things so I feel like maybe the caps will help? :-) Cdg428 (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cdg428 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have got to be kidding me. The thing which I was blocked for was already successfully addressed by a non-moron administrator HOURS before I was blocked by a moron one. There is nothing to defend, there is nothing to understand. I beg of thee, next admin, please think about this for more than eleven seconds, because it's complete crap that I'm blocked. Cdg428 (talk) 03:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you are continuing to be abusive, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. Please see WP:UTRS if you wish to make a further appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll leave this for the next admin, but I would caution that you are treading very close to losing access to edit this page with the name calling. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah well whoop-dee-doo, seems to me like it's probably a lost cause anyway because I get the sense that mindless grovelling at the expense of all logic (which is on my side) is what's necessary in these situations, "oh yes master, I'm a sinner, I'm so sorry, never again!" No thanks. (talk) 03:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

I probably shouldn't even reply to your sarcasm, but no one's asking you to grovel. One of the core pillars here is interacting civilly, you know - like adults. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cdg428 has a point about Morty C-137 they accuse most people of random things.Pepe.is.great (talk) 08:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adults can take a verbal punch when it's warranted. What you have here is a sort of cult where you can do whatever you want in a very passive-aggressive holier-than-thou manner, and of course it's easy for you to take the condescendingly civil high road, you're not the one getting fucked over. Cdg428 (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further abuse

Any admin, here or at WP:UTRS, considering unblocking or reinstating talk page access should see this abuse I received at Commons. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:31, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have also blocked User:Pepe.is.great for vandalism of Morty C-137's userpage. Whether they are related, I am unsure. Black Kite (talk) 11:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]