Jump to content

User talk:Ch.AhmedRaza23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AsalamuAlaikum to all Muslim Wikipedians and Greetings to others. I am Ahmed Raza, signed as 🜇, I am not aware of wikitools, I am thankful I you guide me :) --🜇's Talk Page

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Ch.AhmedRaza23, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Welson Paints, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:59BB:DC5E:5B97:3F40 (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20 August 2021 reviewedby🜇

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll try my best. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 August 2021 regarding Moonis Elahi

[edit]

Hello Ahmed Raza, you have recently deleted 5 paragraphs of Moonis Elahi, your deletion is not justified. The allegation of "Promotional Content" is also not true. He is a member of parliament and all the information in these paragraphs is related and directly linked to him and absolutely not the promotional content. I request you to revert your edit. If you need any other information/clarification please write me back. Thanks. User:Sheharyarahmad1 (talk) 26 August 2021

28 August 2021 reviewedby🜇

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Choudhry Rahmat Ali a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chuhdary Rahmat Ali. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:BD9A:CCD7:C7BA:DDA6 (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll move it, instead of copy paste Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

29 August 2021 reviewedby🜇

[edit]

Please do not move this page unnecessarily. ... discospinster talk 17:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its not unnecessary, its Disambiguation Page. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 20:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its my humble Request, kindly understand it. Its Disambiguation Page, means its name should be Ahmed Raza (Disambiguation). If you still didn't understand, I can do nothing. Stay Blessed. :) Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not all disambiguation pages have (disambiguation) in the title. ... discospinster talk 21:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2 September 2021 regarding my multiple accounts

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Accounts?? Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are using AReditorPK to interchangeably with this account completely contrary to our policies regarding multiple accounts, especially when you use the sock account to remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was just creating a page of a real person, same page already created in URDU and ARABIC languages, but I am blocked, kindly unblock me Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 18:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you created these pages as translation of other languages, 《《 François Abadie (September 27, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Annick Alane (September 28, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Maurice Bambier (October 5, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Bohdan Ihor Antonych (October 13, 2010) (recreated existing article from scratch) Donald Leifert (October 26, 2010) (recreated existing article from scratch) Colette Renard (November 4, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Jean Boffety (January 24, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Luc-Marie Bayle (December 13, 2011) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) 》》 I created a page translated from [Urdu] and Arabic. Named Nufayl Ibn. Abdul Azza, father of Khattab Ibn. Nufayl, you can check both on WikiData too. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of which has anything whatsoever to do with the block on your account.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm blocked because my edits were also done by other account named User:AReditorPK, but the reason behind edits was this. That I and User:AReditorPK created a page, translation of [[1]], you can check this Urdu Page's [WikiData] too. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

28 August 2021 Sorry by 🜇

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The userpage/useraccount named AReditorPK doesn't belongs to me. Any edits made by mentioned account have no connection with me. Whether the Administration block that account or whatever they feel good.

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppet. Block extended on this account indefinitely. Yamla (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am really sorry for inconvenience, In future there will be no SOCKPUPPETERY done by me, kindly unblock me and guide me about multiple account. I have to use Ch.AhmedRaza23 through my mobile and TanzoMazakh through desktop.

Decline reason:

The lying has pretty much done you in. Read WP:SO, act accordingly, and perhaps you can return to editing here in six months. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you.🜇 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Is this some kind of joke? Well, you've already declined your own unblock request ("this unblock request has been declined"), so I guess that makes my job easier. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NinjaRobotPirate Actually I was asking for

{{2nd Chance}}

. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 08:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

🥺

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Your fourth request and it comes no closer to addressing the reasons for your block than any of your previous attempts. You have wasted enough time already - revoking talk page access. Cabayi (talk) 18:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.