Jump to content

User talk:Chat2023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Chat2023, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Am not interested in your opinion. Try something better! Chat2023 (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-

S0091 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Chat2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If your so experienced why not fix the article yourself? You don't have experience, your just working for the media and the money. YOU ARE MUTED! Chat2023 (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pison Peak (February 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not much improvement since previous AFC review. Needs external news sources that cover the company in detail.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which external news sources paid you to demand for publication on their platform? Send your account details so I can start paying you first! Chat2023 (talk) 15:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pison Peak (February 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are not Reliable yourself. How can a non-reliable editor determine what is reliable. How reliable have you being in solving Global issues in your life? Chat2023 (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pison Peak (February 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deepfriedokra was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pison Peak has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pison Peak. Thanks! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Its not important....Try something New! Chat2023 (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Please stop moving pages around -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The AfC reviewers are doing their jobs. It is your not your job to move pages to mainspace that have not been accepted by reviewers. Further disruption and WP:INCIVILITY may result in you being blocked from editing without further warning. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hate Speech is a hate crime. The features I have on my page I mine to use. Chat2023 (talk) 12:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your ''Ligkpen'' would be BLOCKED Chat2023 (talk) 15:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So has your life problems been resolved yet? Your not a reviewer, your a BLOCKED Addict! Chat2023 (talk) 15:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please mind your business Chat2023 (talk) 12:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pison Peak has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pison Peak. Thanks! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Am not interested! Chat2023 (talk) 12:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pison Peak has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pison Peak. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing there to suggest means you lack research skills. This is not the Last Edit. Non Professional group of reviewers all over This page at the moment. Get a Job. I can offer you. Chat2023 (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are Muted Chat2023 (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A job offer? We are all unpaid volunteers here. The implication (along with the promise to sockpuppet is that you are part of a ring of WP:UPE. If you are paid to edit Wikipedia, please read and heed WPCOI and WP:PAID. Paid editing is not forbidden, only doing so without declaring it. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because your a Volunteer doesn't mean you should lie about a review. Why on earth would you say the information is not reliable. How reliable is it to pay bills with a volunteer Job? Chat2023 (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
www.pisonpeak.com.ng is a primary source so cannot be used to establish notability, Linkedin.com and Facebook are not independent or reliable, nigeria24. is just a directory listing. Not sure what you think we are lying about? Theroadislong (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately you forgot to include https://search.cac.gov.ng/home which is a Federal government domain. A corporate Affairs Commission of a country as stated that it was registered in 2013. You didn't include that because it wont validate your lies. If you have personal grievance with the country why throw it at my article? Chat2023 (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
that source has no visible content about the topic? Theroadislong (talk) 16:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That source require you to search it's database. e.g. type in search; Pison Peak Nigerian Limited or simply Pison Peak, if you won't get details like the RC, Address etc. To go further you will have to pay to get other details. That is how it works. Every Company registered in that country has that domain as the reliable source to verify that its registered with a government. I understand you value CNN and BBC, Aljazeera and the likes. But believing that anything from those media and Journals of its like are the only reliable sources your can consider, is a FALLACY. Chat2023 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why we need to "verify that it's registered with a government" see WP:NCORP for what is actually required. Theroadislong (talk) 16:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I had to read it WP:NCORP; But still don't see how it validates your bias. If I tell you that your opinion constitute and promotes the contrary view of the Policy and does not support diversity and inclusion of the global community. However, a reflection is important at this point. I can assure you that this platform require reform or transformation.
NOTED IN QOUTE
''Wikipedia bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources
unrelated to the organization or product.
Notability requires only that these necessary sources have been published—even if these sources are not actually listed in the article yet (though in most cases it probably would improve the article to add them).
A source is where the material comes from. For example, a source could be a book or a webpage.
A source can be reliable or unreliable for the material it is meant to support. Some sources, such as unpublished texts and an editor's own personal experience, are prohibited.
When editors talk about sources that are being cited on Wikipedia, they might be referring to any one of these three concepts:
The piece of work itself (the article, book)
The creator of the work (the writer, journalist)
The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press)
Any of the three can affect reliability. Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process,
authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both. These qualifications should be demonstrable to other people.'' Chat2023 (talk) 17:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pison Peak[edit]

Hello, Chat2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pison Peak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chat2023&oldid=1197809701"