User talk:ChelsiJ2919

September 2022

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Luis Fonsi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't add unreferenced height stats. Binksternet (talk) 17:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to John Singer Sargent. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia is not a reliable source and should not be cited in articles. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Lone-078. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ted Bundy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jadon Sancho, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Vivek Jawali moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Dr. Vivek Jawali. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ajita Chakraborty moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajita Chakraborty, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 16:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Houses of the Holy, you may be blocked from editing. Tkbrett (✉) 14:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Paul J. Crutzen. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi and thanks for your edits. Please note that simply saying your edit is done with a relevant source is not a helpful edit summary (all edits should be done in accordance with relevant sources so this should always be implied). Rather, see WP:ES which suggests it should provide a reason for the edit as well as "what it's all about" - a quick description of what you have included and why is far better than the cut and paste references you have been including. Please also note that references in infoboxes are generally not needed as the information should be referenced within the article - see WP:INFOBOXCITE. Thank you Melcous (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parents in infoboxes

Please stop adding parents to infoboxes. As Template:Infobox person says "Names of parents; include only if they are independently notable or particularly relevant". Also the source you are using, www.thefamouspeople.com, is not what we regard as a reliable source and so cannot be used for referencing on Wikipedia. DuncanHill (talk) 15:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi - I have just discovered four different accounts that you created recently, but did not declare on any of your user pages - this is not appropriate, and I have blocked the accounts. This is discussed at WP:SOCK. If you need to have an alternative account, please declare the connection on your userpage, and that of the other account. Note too that blocks apply to individuals, not just to accounts. Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChelsiJ2919. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given Girth Summit's comments above, at this point you should know better than to use multiple accounts without declaring them and with explaining why you need multiple accounts. If you continue to do this, the next will likely be indefinite. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. Vivek Jawali

Hello, ChelsiJ2919. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. Vivek Jawali, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ajita Chakraborty

Hello, ChelsiJ2919. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ajita Chakraborty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. Vivek Jawali

Hello, ChelsiJ2919. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dr. Vivek Jawali".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]