User talk:Chicago20092016

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fengqi You (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Phrases such as "expert" and "considered as one of the top scientists" with no references seem promotional, not encyclopedic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fengqi You and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fengqi You, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chicago20092016! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coder196, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fengqi You has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fengqi You. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 01:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chicago20092016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not own the account of Coder196. It is own by my roommate. We are both new to Wiki. Coder196 tried to create the page Draft:Fengqi You, but it was unfortunately blocked permanently due to copyright violations (he simply copy from Prof. You's university webpage, which is incorrect). We feel that we should help Prof. Fengqi You to have a wiki page, as he is a good teacher and we appreciated his work - see below:

His research group recently created an interactive map to visualize the spread of COVID-19 pandemic in New York (state).^[1]

This is the reason that I came in, and continue to edit the page for Draft:Fengqi You. Neither of us is professional editors in Wiki. I tried to edit other pages as well, such as process engineering and Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos, which are topics that I am familiar with.

This has nothing to do with so-called sockpuppet, and I hope the Clerk could take a second look and unblock me. The review comments of the previous submission are easy to address, and we can make an easy edit to finalize this first Wiki article, hopefully. Thank you for your consideration!!!

Decline reason:

What you describe is called meatpuppetry. We have no way to know who is sitting at the computer making edits, and as such we must treat two accounts doing the same thing as one person. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chicago20092016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear administrators: I am new to Wiki, and not familiar with many policies here. As I mentioned before, Coder196 is my roommate, we are simply different people. Shall we take a photo and share with you? I cannot think of any way to prove to you that we are two different persons. Since my account is blocked forever, what shall I do next? My roommate's account is also blocked forever. Is everyone from our building banned from editing Wiki forever? Any advice would be greatly appreciated! I tried to explain the situation and clarify any concerns. I'll be happy to do anything that you would suggest to clarify the relationship of my account and Coder196. As you can see from the history of my account, I did not do any editing in bad faith, and did not violate any Wiki policy in editing. I greatly hope that your dear administrator could please give me a second consideration on the request. Your advice to help me prove that we are two persons would be greatly appreciated as well. Many thanks! Chicago20092016 (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Roommate or not, this is a case of WP:MEAT. You have been operating from the same IP address, editing the same draft article. Sorry, but this is the end of the line here. It was deeply inappropriate to set up a new account to continue editing the same draft article, after the original account was blocked. Yamla (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chicago20092016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear administrators: We cannot change the fact that we share the same IP, as it is a shared IP for the building. In fact, everyone in this building has the same IP. I am very sorry about "It was deeply inappropriate to set up a new account to continue editing the same draft article, after the original account was blocked." This is not the motivation, and it is not about after the previous one was blocked. We plan to set up the accounts nearly the same time. Somehow Coder196 was able to sign up, but the system blocked my IP when I was going to sign up, so I had to wait for the 2nd day. As I mentioned before, neither of us is professional editors in Wiki. I tried to edit other pages than the same one, such as process engineering and Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos, which are topics that I am familiar with. With regard to the common page that we are editing, the reason is that we both know the person and respect him. We are motivated by the fact the the article COVID-19 pandemic in New York (state) was edited by some one (definitely not us!) to include the COVID-19 mapping project. Thus, we want to create a page for Prof. Fengqi You to have a wiki page, as he is a good teacher and we appreciated his work on COVID-19: His research group recently created an interactive map to visualize the spread of COVID-19 pandemic in New York (state).[2] Now that this account is blocked forever, is there any chance that I could edit any wiki page in the future? Any advice would be greatly appreciated! Sorry again for the inconvenience. We are indeed different persons, and would be happy to prove. Also, we are not 'targeting' for the same page, as mentioned above. Thank you! Chicago20092016 (talk) 13:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no way that you can "prove" you are two people; a photo only proves that you possess a photo. Even if you could, it doesn't matter. Probably the standard offer is your only pathway back to editing. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Website charts COVID-19 spread across NY state". Cornell Chronicle. April 22, 2020. Archived from the original on April 26, 2020. Retrieved 2020-05-07.

[1] "Website charts COVID-19 spread across NY state". Cornell Chronicle. April 22, 2020. Archived from the original on April 26, 2020. Retrieved 2020-05-07.

[1]