User talk:Chrisclear

Welcome!

Hello, Chrisclear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Paddles (cat)

Hello, Chrisclear,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Paddles (cat) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddles (cat) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 03:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paddles (cat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paddles (cat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddles (cat) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. groig (talk) 17:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ontology (cryptocurrency)

Hello, Chrisclear. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ontology (cryptocurrency), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ontology (cryptocurrency)

Hello, Chrisclear,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ontology (cryptocurrency) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontology (cryptocurrency) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Diptanshu 💬 02:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Chrisclear/Bitcoin Gold

Hello, Chrisclear. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bitcoin Gold".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 05:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect

Hello, Chrisclear. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bitconnect".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 05:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect

User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Chrisclear/Bitconnect during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 10^Eleventeen 19:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ontology (disambiguation)

The article Ontology (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page disambiguating only a primary topic and one other; see WP:ONEOTHER for the relevant guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --ais523 20:46, 19 June 2018 (U T C)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chrisclear. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chrisclear/ontology/

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Chrisclear/ontology/, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 20:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Women's National Cricket League season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Sydney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ivan Milat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Milat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Milat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 01:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why North Melbourne are eliminated.

Sorry that the edit history may not be a good enough explanation, but I will explain myself more thoroughly here. Let's start with the current ladder, ignoring 1st-7th and 18th (Adelaide) as 1st-7th cannot be caught by North, and Adelaide cannot play finals.

8th FOOT 28pts 9th ESS 26pts 10th MELB 24pts 11th CARL 24pts 12th GWS 24pts 13th FREM 20pts 14th GC 18pts 15th HAW 16pts 16th SYD 16pts 17th NM 12pts

For the purposes of proving North are eliminated, we must assume North win all tiebreakers.

First, let's give North 4 wins.

8th NM 28pts 9th FOOT 28pts 10th ESS 26pts 11th MELB 24pts 12th CARL 24pts 13th GWS 24pts 14th FREM 20pts 15th GC 18pts 16th HAW 16pts 17th SYD 16pts

Now, Footscray must lose their remaining 4 matches, this in turn gives Hawthorn and Fremantle wins.

8th NM 28pts 9th FOOT 28pts 10th ESS 26pts 11th CARL 24pts — FREM 24pts — GWS 24pts — MELB 24pts 15th HAW 20pts 16th GC 18pts 17th SYD 16pts

Now, FREM, GWS and MELB all play each other once, as there are 12 points at stake, each team must receive 4 each as to not overtake North Melbourne.

8th NM 28pts 9th FOOT 28pts — FREM 28pts — GWS 28pts — MELB 28pts 13th ESS 26pts 14th CARL 24pts 15th HAW 20pts 16th GC 18pts 17th SYD 16pts

Finally, as ESS play MELB, one of these teams will get at least 30pts, thus eliminating North Melbourne. Barring points deductions (unlikely), North Melbourne are eliminated. RoryK8 (talk) 02:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Review

Hey! I find some draft articles about crypto mooving. So I am regarding for the possible help and reviewing! Halakievsk (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Final

I think you're following 2021 test wtc final. This is not a one-off final to mention squads, this is played by a tournament team and it was mentioned as standalone squads page. Thanks. Kirubar (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons why it's better to be Canadian

Here are 151. I don't vouch for all of them and don't expect you to take any of them too seriously. But some of that 2018 "truth" might still be applicable to why we make better COVID protestors, too. Besides the presence of trucks, I mean. I stand by what I said earlier about their vast and objective physical superiorities over all puny Earthlings, together or not. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need help claims that Jim McKelvey is an employee of Block

I'm having a problem trying to deal with how one user claimed that Jim McKelvey is "not" an employee of Block, Inc. despite the face he was also the founder of the company. The editor basically removed it from the category despite telling him that he is the founder just like Jack. It would be appreciated if you can help me out on it. 20chances (talk) 01:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pre-election pendulum for the 2022 Australian federal election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pre-election pendulum for the 2022 Australian federal election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre-election pendulum for the 2022 Australian federal election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Chrisclear. Thank you for your work on Bradfield, New South Wales (1924–1977). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]