User talk:Ckazilek

I am currently working on adding entry pages for two programs, Ask A Biologist and the Paper Project. Both programs have their roots in science as well as art. While I learn how best to participate in the Wikipedia community I look forward to constructive comments and or suggestions.

Possibly unfree File:Bert Hölldobler.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bert Hölldobler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polarlys (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Please see my comments on the discussion page. I have deleted the image, pending a permissions email (like the format in Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries). If you can get this sent from the copyright holder of the image it can be undeleted and restored easily. Please note that the permissions system has a long queue (weeks) due to a lack of volunteers - Peripitus (Talk) 21:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

In fact, this is correct, the Bert Hölldobler.jpg was a work for hire. I was mistaken that the one that was taken by me, (File:Bert_hoelldobler_2010_public.jpg) and used to replace the file tagged for deletion was in question and was being deleted. I believe we are okay with File:Bert Hölldobler.jpg, being deleted. Thanks for the discussion Ckazilek (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC).

Image classification

{{subst:Please link images|File:Bert hoelldobler 2010 public.jpg}}

^^that's the canned response from wikipedia. I don't know why it didn't work. I was also wondering if you uploaded the email permission for it. ALSO: I'm studying to be a Myrmecologist and I'm jealous that you've met the great Bert Hölldobler.--FUNKAMATIC ~talk 18:20, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Funkamatic, I have looked at the classification alert, but have to confess that I am stumped. Mostly it is due to the infrequent nature of my editing and contribution to Wikipedia and Wikimedia. Guidance would be welcome. Regarding being jealous. You should visit ASU in the Springtime and meet Bert. He is a very approachable person. I also won't say anything to you about knowing and interviewing E. O. Wilson. Sorry, I guess I did. Both are amazing scientists and scholars. Ckazilek (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ask a Biologist front page.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ask a Biologist front page.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Paper Project Web Screen Capture.png

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Paper Project Web Screen Capture.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)