Jump to content

User talk:Coco353

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coco353, You specified in most recent edits to CK article, Krusi's age when abused (6-11 yrs old). My question is that sources who see the statement of findings say SIL investigation reported abuse starting at age 3. This would conflict with Krusi's book and statements. Do you have thoughts or comments from CK? I am not sure how much this effects article, but it is curious.SolaryVeritas (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will email her right away and find out and will let you know as soon as I get the reply. Thank you for help. SolaryVeritas, yesterday Krusi mentioned that the quote from Kevin/SIL was actually from the SR1 documentary so I will be changing its reference/text a bit. Coco353 (talk) 17:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Robinson and order of Wycliffe statements

[edit]

Coco353, Most of the edits are good. Thx for improving my English. You did happen to leave out last line of Robinson statement which, in my opinion, is important - "But SIL does not have matching statements that something really happened". This gives balance to opposing views. Critical.

Also, in last paragraph you edit, I think we have introduced confusion during edits between Wycliffe.ch first response to Krusi's book and second response to SRF1-DOK. These need clearer communication/separation. Notice only after movie does Wycliffe make statement of formal apology. I am certain there is no instance of this to public before, so good to keep order in line. Interesting note - Do you see Wycliffe changes term for "Ritual child murder" to "Ritual infanticide"? Also, they first say Krusi's story about sacrifice was unknown, but now appears that it was but not included with mutual agreement by those reporting. This is a change of position. I find very interesting. SolaryVeritas (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


SolaryVeritas: I went over all my notes for this page and past talk info. I feel you deserve an apology in a sense because I have not taken the time to communicate with you about concerns with your edits and overall approach to krusi's book/documentary. I will try to do so in the future. Somethings are bothersome and I will put more talk questions to you later in the week. Thanks for patience. Coco353 (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coco353 - Apology accepted. I'll watch for your questions.SolaryVeritas (talk) 23:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. VVikingTalkEdits 13:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]