User talk:Cocohead781/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Cocohead781. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! TonyBallioni (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I looked through your recent contributions and have seen a huge amount of anti-vandalism work. Thank you! It's a huge help and it should not go unappreciated. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! Same to you, as well. Cocohead781 (talk) 23:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse

Hi. Just wanted to let you know I reverted your closure of a thread at Teahouse. With a very very few exceptions, we don't close threads at Teahouse. The only time we do it is when it's purely disruption, and that is best left to the handful of admin that hang out at the Teahouse. The idea I think is to leave it open for further questions from the OP and for further explanation by other hosts. Where some may understand what I say quite well, others may understand someone else's explanation better. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 05:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

help

How do I submit an essay?

For now I've moved it to User:Cocohead781/Attacking yourself. To me it seems a personal essay, using the first person, so your userspace is the appropriate place. Compare WP:USERESSAY. Huon (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi I ask question yesterday you replayed but I can't find where u replay d or read your answer my question was there is a person his info is wrong on Wikipedia page and page is locked how to fix his info on locked page thx Mateenm (talk) 09:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Sterling Ranch, Colorado. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, I had no idea how to format it. Thanks for formatting it. Cocohead781 (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

VG Management - re Vittorio Grigolo

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hi Cocohead781 I have made some amendments to Vittorio's page as per his instructions and you have just reverted them all Please can you explain why? What is the issue? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by VGmanagement (talk • contribs) 21:02, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@VGmanagement Sure. I reverted your edits because they removed a section, Live Appearances, without explaining why. If you believe that the section was error-ful, then I would advise to change the section or explain in your edit summary. While the edit summary is optional, it helps people patrolling for vandalism by explaining what the edit is about. Thanks! Cocohead781 (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Earth Economics Edits

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

I am an employee of this organization and have been tasked with removing material from the wikipedia page that factually misleading and/or inaccurate. I see that my edits have been deemed "vandalism", how can I fix this? Bmelville (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@Bmelville To start, feel free to use the edit summary. This will give people a reasoning on why you are doing the thing you are doing. This can be very helpful. Second, you can fix up the text already there. Be sure to cite your sources. Last, declare you are being paid to edit Wikipedia. Add this template to your user page. Thank you for your openness to learn more about Wikipedia. Good luck on your adventures! Cocohead781 (talk) 22:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Edit made to PlayStation_Vita_system_software because Wikipedia:NOTCHANGELOG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nukleon (talk • contribs) 23:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I will not undo changelog edits again. Cocohead781 (talk) 23:39, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Warning Challenges

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Romeowiki (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you for reviewing the changes I made to Planetromeo. The changes I mad may not seem constructive but they are very accurate. I removed old data since planet romeo has completely changed since the website was updated 4 months ago. Working at planet romeo, it is my duty to keep all published date about our brand and producers accurate.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will remove your warning, as your reasoning seems ok. Thank you again. Cocohead781 (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. We are collecting more accurate data and will be adding this in the future. Thanks for your quick reply. Romeowiki (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Will my changes be visible again shortly or do I have to do them again? Romeowiki (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hi - re the Best Loved Game edit I made, I disagree it was not constructive. That page has some issues, and the section I deleted was one of them. It was purely a (greatly over-simplified) personal reflection on recent changes in cricket and had little if anything to do with the article, which is about a book published in 1978. As such, it has no place on that page. 195.188.42.194 (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I believe that my warning was made in error. I will remove it. But, in the future, I would recommend to create an account. Vandalism happens more over IP's, so they are filtered for review more. I apologize, and will remove the warning.
Thanks for removing the warning. I take your point about accounts, but I would also say that I'd left a clear description of the reason for my edit in the edit comments box, which made it clear it wasn't vandalism. Checking what had been deleted against the rest of the article would also have helped you to see it was constructive and not vandalism. Anyway, all sorted now.195.188.42.194 (talk) 12:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


Somalis and Hyena

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

I probably would not have to "vandalize" if you chose to write legitimate facts instead slander. Ohh.... I forgot this is Wikipedia after all, so I probably should not expect many facts.

I reverted your edit because it was unsourced. This is harmful to Wikipedia because we rely on sources. Feel free to redo your edit if you have a source. I am willing to guide you through the citing process if this is so. Thanks! Cocohead781 (talk) 03:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

The source I would like to cite is: http://www.wardheernews.com/umal-and-faisal-clash-of-the-titans/ The information is on the 6/7nth paragraph I do not know how to cite on wikipedia, so I will write out the info and the website source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.13.236.156 (talk) 04:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

@198.13.236.156: If you are in the source editor, then you can use the cite button at the top of your screen. Position your cursor after the relevant data, and then hit Cite. This will open up a text box. Paste your link into there and hit save > Save changes. This should cite your source. Let me know if you have any issues. Cocohead781 (talk) 13:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Semidirect democracy

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hi Cocohead, I think this edit I did is ok [1]. I am reordering the part of semidirect democracy inside direct democracy article, to a new article called semidirect democracy. So, this info now is inside Semidirect democracy article. I just moved, and avoided duplicity of info. What do you think?--Garçongrande (talk) 18:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

@Garçongrande:I have reverted my warning. The page was blanked after my edit, so It's all yours now. Cocohead781 (talk) 18:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Huggle summaries

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

You may want to reset your Huggle software, as it's generating numerous edit summaries that contain nothing except "((HG) (3.3.2))", missing the revert details entirely. Home Lander (talk) 23:00, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Changed settings a couple of days ago. Cocohead781 (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Courier Mail

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hi Cocohead It is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia that content requires SOURCES, which means there must be CITATIONS. It is not a blog where people get to include their own personal opinions. Neither of the items that I removed have citations. One had been marked as 'citation needed' for 5 YEARS. I have removed the content again pending CITATIONS. 2.30.225.13 (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@2.30.255.13: While it is correct stating that it has been marked for 5 years, I see no policy that prohibits citation needed tags after 5 years. Of course, I may be wrong, feel free to correct me. Feel free to add a cite cleanup tag to the page if you want it to have more citations. Thanks! Cocohead781 (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Cocohead781 any content that is uncited can be removed at any time by any user. All content in Wikipedia must be verifiable, and the burden of evidence is on the person restoring the content . This is our most core content policy, and reverting an IP user with it via Huggle and warning them was inappropriate. I'd also like to suggest that you slow down on Huggle and focus on patrolling recent changes for now. You have a fair amount of complaints about your vandal patrolling on this talk page, which suggests you need to slow down, and cutting out the automation to learn how to recognize vandalism manually is in my mind a good way forward. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Ok. I'll take a couple of days off Huggle. Cocohead781 (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Also, as an FYI, while you are free to manage your talk page however you like, it's not typical to close discussions on it. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Hey, schmuckass

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hey, schmuckass, you have problems with people adding FACTS to articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:302:FB9B:0:0:0:E6A (talk) 02:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

@2601:581:302:FB9B:0:0:0:E6A: You are welcome to add facts to articles, as long as you cite your sources. This is what makes Wikipedia great. Since your edit is unsorced, I removed it per WP:BURDEN. If you find a reliable source, you may redo your edit, but please cite your source. Have a great evening (It's late here), Cocohead781 (talk) 02:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!

Hello, Cocohead781, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Review of BMT Fourth Avenue Line

Hi, I see you recently reviewed BMT Fourth Avenue Line and it appeared to be your first review. My only concern is that it seemed to have taken you only 20mins to review then pass immediately, which does concern me. Can you be sure all spelling and grammar is correct, and that you have checked the prose written against every reference to ensure it matches up? Even for an experienced reviewer, it would often take them a fair bit longer on an article of that size, with 80+ references.. certainly alot more than 20 minutes. The very quick turnaround concerns me, as there have been instances before where reviews have been reverted if it's apparent the undertaking was not done thouroughly. As its your first one, you may opt for get a second opinion to ensure your assessment fits with the view of others. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Alex Shih (talk) 05:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes

Hi Cocohead781, I see that you have recently been granted the Pending Changes Reviewer right. Please ensure that you do not accept edits that introduce unsourced material, especially to BLPs, as you did here. It is precisely these type of edits I protected the article to prevent. Thank you,--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:British Jews

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:British Jews. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

A Turkey for You!

 —BLIR Gobble Gobble 🦃 Sign has given you a Turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving!

Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—BLIR Gobble Gobble 🦃 Sign 16:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

A message from Muhammad Anas Younus

Hello Sir, I received your message about my removing content in Parveen Shakir, i am very sorry about the thing i did actually i was pretty new to Wikipedia that's why i had some problems in editing in the article. Whatever happened in that article wasn't deliberated, it was a real mistake.

Thank you,

Regards, Muhammad Anas Younus Muhammad Anas Younus (talk) 07:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Muhammad Anas Younus: Thanks for letting me know. I'm willing to help you out on editing if you feel like it, or the friendly folks over at The Teahouse could also help you. Thanks- Cocohead781 (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emily Beecham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emily Beecham. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cocohead781. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A message from Parkenings

Hello. About my Phillips Holmes edits. I am willing to discuss this matter. You removed to much of my edits & corrections. I have edited the page with great care. Please explain why my edits should be incorrect. Parkenings (talk) 17:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC) Parkenings (talk) 17:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I apologize. When I was reading through your edit, I only saw your change from gay to homosexual (Or it's from a previous edit). I have to work on keeping away tunnel vision. Cocohead781 (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Trondheim Region science direct article

Where is the "science direct article" that you mentioned at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trondheim Region please? (I'll watch this page for an answer.) Batternut (talk) 09:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about, should have linked it earlier. The article can be found [2], but it seems to only be the abstract. Cocohead781 (talk) 14:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flag of Turkey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Flag of Turkey. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

i am new here i made the edit of republica of krajina because it never was a recognized republic of serbs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.252.137.23 (talk) 04:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-50

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

Changes later this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 December. It will be on all wikis from 14 December (calendar).

Meetings

  • You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 12 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
  • You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 13 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kingsman: The Golden Circle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kingsman: The Golden Circle. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-51

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News

  • Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 8 January 2018.

Problems

  • When you import a page from another wiki the usernames of the users who edited the article on the wiki you imported it from are shown in the article history. This should link to the users on the original wiki. A script to fix this caused problems for Wikidata and German Wikipedia. It also created a large number of SUL accounts on wikis where editors had never edited. [8]
  • Some bot owners got email about their bots logging in from a new computer. If this is from one or a couple of wikis, you can turn these messages off in your preferences on those wikis until the problem has been solved. If not, you can report more about the problem in Phabricator.

Changes later this week

  • There is no new MediaWiki version this week. There will be no new MediaWiki version next week either.

Meetings

  • You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 19 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert E. Lee

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert E. Lee. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Reba McEntire

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reba McEntire. Legobot (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

A message from Shane Manning

Hi,

You replied to my request to have access to edit the Wikipedia page on Michael McCormack MP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_McCormack_(Australian_politician)).

You asked me to provide sources to the changes so that the page could be edited.

I've linked a number of sources below, some web pages directly from the Australian Government website as well as a number of news articles from various publications within Australia.


https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Parliamentarian?MPID=219646

https://www.pm.gov.au/hon-michael-mccormack-mp

https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/minister/mccormack

https://www.michaelmccormack.com.au/

http://www.dailyadvertiser.com.au/story/5131214/mccormack-named-veterans-affairs-minister-in-government-reshuffle/

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/malcolm-turnbulls-new-cabinet-and-ministry/news-story/9038a077a777ccb503a39bc0944d902c

I hope these satisfy what is required to be granted access to change Minister McCormack's page.

Thanks,

Shane

Shane Manning (talk) 04:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Strzok

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Strzok. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles, Prince of Wales

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charles, Prince of Wales. Legobot (talk) 04:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

A message from Simonneed

Hi... I'm Lord Clement-Jones' PA... hence I updated his page with his current information.

Simonneed (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
--Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! The problem with your edit is that you are employed by Lord Clement-Jones. I implore you to read WP:COI before editing again. Again, welcome! Cocohead781 (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


Why do you want to leave information on there that is INCORRECT??

Simonneed (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Of course incorrect information is frowned upon. The best way to edit the page (or any page with a COI) is to file a edit request on the article's talk page. You can find the talk page link on the top of the article. Cocohead781 (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


At least change his son's name.... his son isn't called Richard - it's Harry. And if you type House of Lords Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence into Google, you'll find plenty of up to date information on Tim if you do want to take any of my correct edits on board. This short interlude has made me realise that Wikipedia, like many say, is not up to date or based on fact.

Simonneed (talk) 19:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
@Simonneed:It does sound like you have something to add to the English Wikipedia. The wiki only updates when allowed by all of it's policies, and a COI editor can do some really nasty things, so the community as a whole has decided that COI editing should not be allowed. In it's place, a edit request can be posted, requesting that the article be edited. The only requirements for starting an edit request is a summary of changes and a Reliable Source. After that, an editor will come by and make your change you requested on the article, granted he accepts it. If you need help starting a edit request, I am always here to help you. Cocohead781 (talk) 01:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Tech News: 2018-26

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

Problems

  • When a link text was in italics or had other formatting you could sometimes not edit it in the visual editor. This has now been fixed. [9][10]

Changes later this week

  • Content translation users who translate between any two of Arabic, English, French, Japanese and Russian will be asked to be part of a research project. This is to create better tools for translating articles. [11]
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 June. It will be on all wikis from 28 June (calendar).

Meetings

  • Recurrent item You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 26 June at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
  • Recurrent item Advanced item You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 27 June at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cocohead781. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cocohead781. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cocohead781/Archive_1&oldid=991670708"