User talk:Columnistvivek
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
for add category on article Sadguru_Brahmeshanand_Acharya_Swami
- I'm assuming you want to add an already existing category, simply put [[Category:Name of category]] at the bottom(without the "nowiki" tags I have here to suppress that function). 331dot (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Thakor Laxmanji Punjaji for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakor Laxmanji Punjaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mccapra (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Sudhir S. Mehta moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Sudhir S. Mehta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir Mehta (disambiguation)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sudhir Mehta (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Certes (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Panara Chandrashekhar for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panara Chandrashekhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Oaktree b (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Columnistvivek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As I think our articles made till now and the edits made by us have been in free writing what is the reason for closing my account :I don't know as I see now that I have been implicitly blocked by a user's suppuket policy :maybe we live in the same country and he should :First this block has edited the user's article, if it is wrong to do so, please let us know and we are ready to correct it.
Decline reason:
I don't completely understand what point you are trying to get across, although at least that it takes the form of apparent free verse is a little different. And that may be the real problem here, beyond the sockpuupetry you didn't really address. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Columnistvivek (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Columnistvivek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
sir thank you very much for your answer received as i would like to tell you that i write my article freely and try to put it on wikipedia As I understand after going through suppuket policy carefully I edited some send which seems that I am connected with these people in some way or the other like Rohit Jangid, Panara chandrashekhar both of them But because of editing the article, I am also being taken under suspicion. But I am a resident of Gujarat state of India, I came to know about these two well known personalities from the news media and I also try to give some of my contribution, if it is wrong to do so, please correct me and I will be very happy.
Decline reason:
I'm sorry to say, you lack sufficient ability to communicate in written English for us to consider unblocking you (e.g. "suppuket"). Nor have you properly addressed the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pcmishradigital/Archive. Yamla (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Working through an admin like you and I will not do such mistake in future I assure you for this please activate my account thank you}}
Columnistvivek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
sir i got your reply thank you very much
As I would like to tell you that I freely write my article and try to put it on Wikipedia
As I go through the suppuket policy carefully, I understand that I have edited some pages which appear to be associated with these users in some way or the other.
Like I am also being taken under suspicion because of editing the article on Rohit Jangid But I am a resident of Gujarat state of India, I came to know about these personality through news media and I also tried to give some contribution. If i am doing this is wrong please correct me and I will be more than happy
I assure you that I will not do such mistake in future.
Decline reason:
I too urge you to edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language; you do not have the skill in English needed to edit here. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia- it isn't any more important than other versions. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Columnistvivek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You putting my account in jeopardy makes me suspicious.
I attempted to contribute some articles concerning these accounts. Like Rohit Jangid and 2nd Mistake was Panara Chandrashekhar Notability issues
Yes, I admit I'm mistaken.
But I've been contributing to Wikipedia through free writing, and I have nothing to do with the above account. It's my fault, and I accept it and will not make the same mistake again.please activate my account.... thank you
Decline reason:
Edit the version of Wikipedia in your native language. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
I recieved your email; as you do not have access to this page, you must request unblock via WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- How delightful -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- I also received your e-mail. E-mailing administrators directly is not the way to appeal your block. Please read through the link that 331dot gave you if you have not already done so. Thank you. Girth Summit (blether) 12:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- And, please. before requesting unblocking at UTRS, read the WP:GAB. Please concisely and clearly describe how you merited blocking, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)