User talk:Comrade John

Welcome!

Hello, Comrade John, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

moving ship pages

Please stop moving ship pages. For the cases I've looked at, these pages, at one time, had hull number disambiguators but were moved to new titles without the hull number disambiguator because there are no other ships of the same name and so, no need for a disambiguator.

Please restore the pages that you have moved.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships)#Naming articles about military ships.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Trappist the monk § About moving ship pages

Hello , Trappist the monk:

Saw your message.

Not good at English , so i ask another way to you , with the issue i had.

Before I moved those ship articles with adding hull number.

I already saw some ship article with hull number , which are no need for disambiguator in it as well.

I wanted to ask , is there any problem of it ? Am i violate guideline that you posted ?

Also , the main thing , Is my movement , affect your search of those article ?

Not trying to be rude to you but please understand i'm not good at English.

-- Comrade John (talk) 14:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One conversation in one place, please.

The basic rule is: do not use disambiguation unless it is needed. Too many ship articles were created with disambiguation. We have slowly been fixing those. You are undoing our hard work.

Yes, moving articles that do not need disambiguation to titles with disambiguation does violate the guideline. Because of redirects, finding these articles is not a problem.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Like i said , i'm not moving those articles with disambiguation such as USS Wickes and it's disambiguator USS Wickes (DD-75) and USS Wickes (DD-578).

I'm moving those articles with putting hull numbers is because , for the way i see it , the US ship title without hull number is incomplete , the readers don't know what type of ship is about when they see the title , especially to those unique ship article such as USS Cassin Young (DD-793).

In short , I just wanted it tidy.

If i'm undoing your fixing , i apologize. -- Comrade John (talk) 15:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

USS Wickes is a ship index page; it does not need to be disambiguated. USS Wickes (DD-75) and USS Wickes (DD-578) share the name Wickes so must be disambiguated. There was only one USS Cassin Young so it does not need and should not be disambiguated. The guideline Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships)#Naming articles about military ships refers to the policy Wikipedia:Article titles#Precision and disambiguation (policy > guideline). The policy says that the article title should be USS Cassin Young not ~~USS Cassin Young (DD-793)~~.

I understand why you would have all US warship article titles include the hull number. Unfortunately, doing that, is against en.wiki policy.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up - I've gone through and reverted all of these page moves. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of periscope photo from Gato-class article

I noticed that you removed a periscope photo of a sinking Japanese ship from the Gato-class article. I put these photos in most of the WWII submarine class articles to illustrate the extensive combat operations of WWII US submarines. This primarily involved sinking Japanese ships. I think it is definitely related to the article. RobDuch (talk) 18:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes, including Commencement Bay class

Could you please start providing sources for your changes here, or at least leave an Edit summary to explain them? Britmax (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

US subs

I see you're adding the laid down and struck dates to a lot of US subs in the infobox and/or the lede. Firstly the stuff in the infobox should be taken from the text of the article and secondly anything in the text should be cited. I've noticed you just adding the laid down date into the lede and leaving the cite as DANFs which doesn't give a laid down date. You need to cite it all with your source. Great to see someone working on the little ships. On your query on the project page I use (although they are now quite dated) the Ian Allen series titled xxxxxxx Warships of World War I or II. Heres an example Austro-Hungarian Warships of World War I Hardcover – 15 Apr 1976 by Rene Greger (Author) - price currently is ridiculous, normally under £20 Lyndaship (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:CITING SOURCES which explains things. Btw if someone posts on your talk page its best to reply on that page to save fragmented conversations Lyndaship (talk) 07:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - ^theWOLFchild 01:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Comrade John. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template:Costa Rican elections

Hi. The Central American Federal Republic was a very loose connection of states, each of it with its own constitution and congresses, like the US although probably with even more internal autonomy, thus even as member of the Federation it (and all other countries) held elections for their own respective state congress (and in theory for the Federal Congress too, tho this wasn't always done).

About the other thing, as far as I can tell almost always that there was presidential election there were also elections to Congress, exceptions may exist but I'll had to check the Electoral Court's historical government used for each case which you can check [here]. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 09:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German submarine U-1107, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2033

Moved from my tp

RE:October 2023

I don't understand , am I making editing errors and making edit conflicts with others ?

If you refer to those U-boat articles' infobox parameters fixing , I know what I'm doing , I don't even need to preview those changes before saving and I didn't vandalise any of it.

Please understand the whole story before you send this kind of messages , thank you. Comrade John (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I, like most editors here, like to keep talk page dicussions in one place, (and as also noted in WP:CROSS-POST). As such, it should remain here, where it began.

What first caught my attention were the multiple edits to Lyndaships's tp, for just one small post. Even your post on my tp took two edits. And your history shows the same issue on other articles, as well as talk pages. We all make mistakes, but using the preview function every time, for every edit, helps to cut down on those mistakes, and the need for follow up edits to correct them, which in turn helps to avoid leaving errors in articles, (ones that aren't corrected), and helps to cut down on the number of edits that clog up page histories and blow up watch lists. This was just a simple reminder that you could either pursue and make an issue of, or just quietly take it on board and move on. Up to you, but either way, have a nice day - wolf 07:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Comrade John!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]