User talk:Cornelis Dopper

February 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Martin Heidegger that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong, may have been removed? Who are you? Why are you here? And why are you maybe removing my edits? All my edits have been civil, so stop complaining. Cornelis Dopper (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am an unconnected editor. This [1], this [2] and this "notification" are personal attacks and very far from being civil. Theroadislong (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong, can you also react on the fact that this Martin guy is editing the lead section of the article even though there's a discussion going on? Are you also sending Martin a text like this on his talk page? And btw, you won't call it nasty behavior when there's a discussion going on and he's going on to change things anyway? Unbelievable, this. Cornelis Dopper (talk) 15:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are no guidelines that restrict users editing, whilst there is a discussion going on? Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheroadislongWhen a sentence is contested? And when we've just reached consensus about that sentence, he's suddenly changing it? Are you kidding me? That goes against every principle! Cornelis Dopper (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Martin Heidegger. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please be more specific? Which attacks? I've only commented on his remarks and actions. Cornelis Dopper (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This personal attack [3]. Theroadislong (talk) 18:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong, honestly, I don't know what you are talking about! What is personal about that? The man is changing agreements we had, I'm slightly pissed, but where in earth is the personal attack? Honestly, I don't see it. In my opinion, a personal attack is: asshole, dickhead, wanker etc. Now am I saying that? Cornelis Dopper (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's personal. I, for one, would much rather be called an asshole, a dickhead or a wanker than be called untrustworthy. The first three are just meaningless terms of abuse, but "untrustworthy" gets right to the heart of a person's character. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Phil Bridger, if an agreement has been reached on a certain formulation and after a week or so a participant of that discussion is singlehandedly, without any form of discussion, changing the sentence again. How would you call that? Btw, I called him 'untrustworthy in these discussions'. Not simply untrustworthy. Cornelis Dopper (talk) 21:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop opening new ANI threads[edit]

The dispute with Phil Bridger is all part of the same issue. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Cornelis Dopper (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 22:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]