Jump to content

User talk:Crackalack7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sam (orangutan), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Sam (orangutan). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Sam (orangutan). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Darkwind (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Sam (orangutan). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. --Darkwind (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Sam (orangutan)[edit]

The facts you're adding to the article appear dubious - i.e. it looks like you're just making it up. Now, if I'm wrong about that, please forgive me -- but remember you need to cite your sources for the info you add, else it looks like vandalism. --Darkwind (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits[edit]

I have seen your comment at User talk:Darkwind, in which you ask what you have done wrong, and deny that you have been vandalizing. This edit may perhaps have been made with good intentions, but it adds a claim without giving any source or evidence to support the claim. This edit may just possible have been intended well, but at best it adds a personal opinion, not a verifiable fact. However, this edit and this one can only possibly have been intended as vandalism, and to pretend you don't know that is not constructive. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]