User talk:CrazyAboutBollywood

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CrazyAboutBollywood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 09:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags[edit]

Hi, CrazyAboutBollywood. I noticed that the first edit you did was to remove a speedy deletion tag from the article Bollywood Xplorer, asserting that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, and that you removed the tag again making the same claim. However, this is often a difficult call to make esecially as a brand new editor, and this article certainly does not meet guidelines in its current state: there is no credible claim to significance, and there are no reliable sources in there at present - which is one of the most important foundations of Wikipedia. Please read our policy on reliable sources, and secondary sources, to understand what is required.

Finally, although this account did not create the article, if you have any kind of connection to the website and/or the person who did create the article, you should not under any circumstances remove the speedy deletion tag. Please allow an uninvolved administrator to review the article; if they fing that it meets the requirements they will remove the tag and allow the article to stay. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 09:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidelines.I do not have any connection with the brand or with the creater of the article. I read this notice on template 'If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice' so i removed it and tried to improve the article. It is co-incidence when i logged in i saw this article. Any way bonadea, Thanks --CrazyAboutBollywood 09:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)--CrazyAboutBollywood 09:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you very much for making that clear. Note that there is nothing to prevent you from improving the article while the speedy deletion tag is there - if there are in fact secondary sources that cover the subject, please add them to the article. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 09:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the article is unfortunately going to have to be deleted in its current form, since it's also a copyright violation of http://bollywoodxplorer.com/about-us/. --bonadea contributions talk 09:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs[edit]

Please do not add bold faced votes again and again to AfDs. You've made your point in the opening nomination, please do not keep repeating it add adding "DELETE" again and again. If you wish to respond to any comment, please do so, but adding the same text doesn't help the discussion. —SpacemanSpiff 22:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is Amanrajveer (talk · contribs) your account? —SpacemanSpiff 22:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CrazyAboutBollywood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

some admin has blocked my id saying that i have abused multiple accounts. Is asking any question for help is banned on wikipedia? Is commenting on any deletion request is banned for any user? If not i id should be unlocked. It seems JamesBWatson is favoring some users and creating regime, thats why he has locked my account. so i can not comment or edit wiki anyway if any admin think that i should unlocked, then it is good, and if dont think, it is also good. in that case i dont have any option i will leave wikipedia with a very bad experience CrazyAboutBollywood 08:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you wish to be unblocked you need to address the question of whether or not you abused multiple accounts, rather than making accusations against the blocking admin. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CrazyAboutBollywood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never abused any account. I have only asked for the help. It is not fact that I have any connection with some user Amanrajveer. My account should be unlocked CrazyAboutBollywood 10:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Behaviourial evidence looks compelling. Max Semenik (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SPI opened here (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]