User talk:Crookesmoor/Archive
Welcome[edit]
|
Hogging move[edit]
Hi Crookesmoor! I noticed that you moved Hogging to the disambiguated title Hogging (sexual practice). Are you intending to create a new article for another meaning of Hogging? Thanks, DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Yes, I agree that is probably a better main article though it's a little unorthodox to disambiguate when the article titles are not the same. Still, I think it's probably best. I'll add a WP:Hatnote to the Hogging and sagging article. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- He, he. You did it already. Well done! DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Crookesmoor - thanks for creating this article. Given your contributions, you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Sheffield. Best wishes, Warofdreams talk 21:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Little context in Quantity balance method[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Quantity balance method, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Quantity balance method is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Quantity balance method, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Bacobens Rock Top 500[edit]
A tag has been placed on Bacobens Rock Top 500 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bsadowski1 (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Kent Tops Travel[edit]
No problem! It's a pleasure! Arriva436talk/contribs 19:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Open channel flow[edit]
Wikipedia needs an article about OC flow asap, with all the main formualae and some diagrams too.
Articles[edit]
CfD nomination of Category:Locations visible on Google Street View[edit]
I have nominated Category:Locations visible on Google Street View (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jag Kanchana Singh[edit]
A tag has been placed on Jag Kanchana Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jag Kanchana Singh, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jag Kanchana Singh[edit]
The article Jag Kanchana Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Sorry for the lady, but a local eccentric gone missing is not encyclopedia material.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Jag Kanchana Singh[edit]
I have nominated Jag Kanchana Singh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jag Kanchana Singh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThaddeusB (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Railway station DfT categories[edit]
Hi, where did you get the information for this edit? I don't dispute it, but another has. Unfortunately the sources that I have access to don't list very many stations in Scotland - and Edinburgh Waverley is not among them. Do you know where this info came from, please? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
The article Landfill indie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails general notability guidelines.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NYSMtalk page 15:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Arsenal FC league finishing positions since 1947.png[edit]
Please update the file.Lihaas (talk) 07:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
RE: Arsenal[edit]
not sure what your comment means...Lihaas (talk) 12:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
LFC[edit]
The article is a summary of the Liverpool, not a place where every single event that happens is recorded. This event has absolutely no relevance to this article, this article summarises the main events in the club's history, its PR official having a meeting with a fan in a coffee shop is not one of them. NapHit (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Infoboxes on classical music articles[edit]
Hello, I've reverted your edits at Cathy Berberian, because articles about classical music generally do not use infoboxes; see the relevant guideline. Graham87 02:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
SuggestBot[edit]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Julia Mulligan[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Julia Mulligan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §FreeRangeFrog 17:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Richard Rhodes (police commissioner) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. §FreeRangeFrog 17:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Oliver Martins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. §FreeRangeFrog 17:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Ball[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ron Ball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
SuggestBot 2[edit]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Crookesmoor, just wanted to let you know I've nominated Ron Ball for Did you know. The nomination page is at Template:Did you know nominations/Ron Ball. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ron Ball[edit]
 | On 11 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ron Ball, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ron Ball defeated former UK government minister James Plaskitt to become the first Police and Crime Commissioner of Warwickshire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ron Ball. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Mifter (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
The article Landfill indie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article doesn't appear to be encyclopedic and doesn't appear to meet the general notability guidelines. The article is mostly just quotes from sources. It's just a minor phrase/meme that isn't notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NYSMtalk page 00:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Landfill indie for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Landfill indie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landfill indie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NYSMtalk page 00:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Platforms at MK Central[edit]
I think 5 was added later too but Tom is right, we need a citation before it can go in. Fancy crawling through the back issues of the Citizen? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For your great contributions! Way2veers (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Prologis[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Prologis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tolly4bolly 11:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
SuggestBot III[edit]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Premier League[edit]
Hello Crookesmoor. I've just seen that you moved the Premier League article to Men's Premier League. This was an extremely poor decision - this is not the name of the league, and you must have realised that it would be controversial. Could I ask why you thought it was a good idea? Thanks, Number 57 12:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
The Moor: street & quarter[edit]
Hi, and thanks for contributing!
When two articles are merged, there are some non-obvious needs that must be met, and in the case of The Moor and The Moor Quarter, repair is needed. I am not raising any objection to your merge proposal, but implementing it involves steps whose necessity you presumably weren't aware of.
I'm proceeding with replacing your Rdr at The Moor with a Dab page, since this is easily reversible if i'm missing something that you'll be in a position to point out. In addition to that, there will be some attribution issues (arising under our copy-left provisions) to be solved, and if you are willing, i'll be able take care of them more efficiently with some advice and perhaps assistance from you.
If you don't mind, let's keep both sides of our discussion here on your talk page; i'll keep an eye out for your changes to this section so i can still respond promptly.
Fruitful editing,
--Jerzy•t 08:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
June 2013[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Arsenal F.C. does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Airport Live may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[[The Tube (2012 TV series]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
TemplateData is here[edit]
Hey Crookesmoor
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Villa Park[edit]
Hello, and thanks for your explanation in the edit summary. Thing is, Villa Park is a featured article, so there are a few problems with the banner thing. The first is that information must be reliably sourced. Even if the wording were readable from the panorama, which it isn't really, all that photo verifies is that when it was taken, those words were being displayed. It doesn't verify that they're a permanent part of the stadium's structure and facilities or indicate their importance. If they really are significant enough to include, they need a brief explanation for the benefit of the general reader rather than just listing, and if they're really "famous quotes", they ought to be attributed to whoever's being quoted. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, in case you hadn't already spotted it, the text was removed again by another editor who started a discussion on its inclusion at Talk:Villa Park#Banner. Your input welcome. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Megabusplus Logo.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Megabusplus Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Template:Infobox UK housing association has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
The Consulting Association blacklist article[edit]
Hi there,
I hope this is the right / best way to send you a message. I'm doing so because I've just make a fair-sized edit to the Consulting Association article, which we both edited yesterday.
I thought it needed a good clean up to make the article more cohesive and readable - I've tried to maintain and respect your edits, but I ended up writing several hundred words, so they may have got lost in the noise.
I don't really understand why you made the edits you did about it being a "business" not an "organisation" - I'd be really grateful if you could clarify on the talk page if you know more than I do. I've spent several hours last night reading newspaper articles and parliamentary reports, and I have no reason to believe that Kerr "owned" or controlled TCA - it just seems like a legal structure established by McAlpine or all the construction companies in order to mutually fund the blacklisting scheme.
Also, I'm freakin' knackered, but I don't think that the Droitwich location of Kerr's office is so important as to warrant inclusion in the opening paragraph of the article.
Thanks for your help,
Stroller (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Manchester Sport and Leisure Trust, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.manchestersportandleisure.org/about-us.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
The article UTC@MediaCityUK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:TOOSOON - wait until the institution opens. If the institution will not offer the equivalent of a United States "High school diploma" or the equivalent of a bachelor's or higher degree, consider that as grounds to not have the article even after the school opens unless additional evidence of notability is provided.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:48, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of bus routes in Greater Manchester[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of bus routes in Greater Manchester, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 13:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
James Cook station[edit]
According to their blog, James Cook is not just a shortening of it although they are relying on another blog so I might have been rather hasty but here is where I read it. Simply south ...... discombobulating confusing ideas for just 8 years 16:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Btw, what happened to your signature? Simply south ...... discombobulating confusing ideas for just 8 years 16:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of 2014–15 F.C. United of Manchester season for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014–15 F.C. United of Manchester season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 F.C. United of Manchester season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hi Crookesmoor, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi – in due course I'll expand this with further sources I have access to. I have added it to my watchlist. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I'll scan one from my collection and upload. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, good thinking: I will put together an alternative version and run it past you. There are several other articles within the scope of such an infobox but which haven't been created yet; I will include these as redlinks. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 17:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- As I was pondering this last night, it crossed my mind that a general article covering features/data/layout of computer-era tickets might be good. I will reuse an old sandbox, User:Hassocks5489/Phillips, to put together some ideas. I can dig out references. Also will put that new infobox design there. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 11:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- I should have a chance to start some proper work on these articles over the weekend – this week was busier than expected! Regarding the proposal at User:Hassocks5489/Phillips, this may be a slow-burn while I gather sources, but I will continue to tinker with it. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 00:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- As I was pondering this last night, it crossed my mind that a general article covering features/data/layout of computer-era tickets might be good. I will reuse an old sandbox, User:Hassocks5489/Phillips, to put together some ideas. I can dig out references. Also will put that new infobox design there. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 11:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, good thinking: I will put together an alternative version and run it past you. There are several other articles within the scope of such an infobox but which haven't been created yet; I will include these as redlinks. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 17:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
New articles[edit]
You don't just cut a chunk out of an article and start a new one with it. At the very least you should say where it came from. J3Mrs (talk) 14:27, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy Coast UTC, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nuclear energy and Lakes College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Attendance Allowance may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Excluded groups: People under 65. If already claiming Disability Living Allowance]] before the age of 66 it continues. It is not converted to Attendance Allowance. Claimants must be
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tied house, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]
|
This is just to say thank you for your effort to improve Chibok schoolgirls kidnapping. Cheers! Ashish Lohorung (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for October 23[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of television series considered the best, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anglophone and The Defenders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
This edit is not helpful. If you have made any other such unhelpful edits, please go back and correct them. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sweden Sans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Cranbrook railway station (Devon)[edit]
Hi, regarding your move of Cranbrook (Devon) railway station to Cranbrook railway station (Devon): I've added to an existing thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#British station pages moves. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Combined authorities[edit]
I see you've added a proposal for a South East Wales combined authority to the article - however (as far as I'm aware) Wales isn't covered by the combined authority legislation (it only covers England outwith London). Whilst I believe there are proposals for mergers of Welsh councils, these are not the same thing as the combined authorities of England. Could you clarify? Argovian (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Book:Stations Test[edit]
Book:Stations Test, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Stations Test and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Book:Stations Test during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Undateables, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Learning difficulties. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Line of Beauty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lonely hearts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tauheedul Islam Boys' High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free school. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport Focus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watchdog. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Great Haddon[edit]
The article Great Haddon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced crystal-ball-gazing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Stretford Mall for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stretford Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stretford Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010Talk 16:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Coast 500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunrobin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Dulwich Paragon[edit]
Proposed deletion of Dulwich Paragon[edit]
The article Dulwich Paragon has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
September 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. I noticed that you recently removed some content from London Borough of Haringey without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DBaK (talk) 13:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:A4E logo.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:A4E logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi – thanks for the addition. I'm now in a position to add more info with refs, although I won't have time to do so immediately. I may also scan and upload a couple of tickets from the same machine "before and after" to give a side-by-side comparison. (By the way I hadn't realised that any of the S&Bs at Lewisham had been converted yet! I've had reports of about 6–8 Southeastern stations so far.) Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of NME covers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Maccabees. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Football Club involved in Apprentice (UK), Series 11[edit]
Can't include the full detail of this in "Task Review", but maybe you can add it into the first "Notes" point, as a mention of the major contracts that were involved. Just a suggestion. GUtt01 (talk) 16:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Dulwich Hamlet Matter[edit]
Following your decision to report me, I had a rethink about this information. First of all, I never removed the information, I simply shifted the club's name into a point within the episode's "Notes" section. However, after spending a day thinking over this, I decided to revise it back to how you had set it out before, albeit with a minor change in wording as is present with the current revision. The only thing I should point out, is that you may have wanted to have included reference links to prove that was the club's stadium that was featured; I decided to include that as well.
Please accept my apologies for not taking the time to consider if your edits had been okay or not. GUtt01 (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Core (architecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Lead too long at Let Toys Be Toys[edit]
Hi Crookesmoor, thanks for drawing my attention to the excessive lead length over at Let Toys Be Toys - it was one of my first page creations and could do with some improvement! I've shortened the lead now by moving the bulk of the material into a new 'History' section, so its hopefully in slightly better shape now. Best wishes! JezGrove (talk) 12:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of All 4 Games[edit]
Hello Crookesmoor,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged All 4 Games for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 13:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Final Score (2017 film)[edit]
Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Crookesmoor, thanks for creating Final Score (2017 film)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I looked the film up and couldn't find much information on it. Is it truly notable? If so, please add more references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons Talk 17:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
March 2016[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to The Glades (Bromley), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 15:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
UTC Oxfordshire[edit]
Thanks for your recent edit to the UTC Oxfordshire article. It's great to get more information like that into short articles like this one. Where did you come across that info? If you could add a reference into the article showing where it comes from, that would be really helpful. Thanks CalzGuy (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Greater Manchester University Technical College[edit]
The article The Greater Manchester University Technical College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I believe this is a diploma mill or fake school trading off the name of Manchester University and trying to telescope as many search terms into its name as possible. Its official web address is .co.uk which would not be the case for a bona fide educational establishment which tends to have ac.uk or org.uk depending on whether it is provided by the UK government/local authority via the UK domain name registrar (for the first), or administered by the school itself (for the second). It would be unlikely to be .co.uk. More reasons over at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 3#RM, but I am going to kick this off sooner rather than later before I have done much more homework. That it is next to (but not on the campus of Bolton College is also suspicious. Could be genuine but is doing its best not to seem so. It is formally (not formerly) the "The Greater Manchester Sustainable Engineering University Technical College", according to its lede, which packs one more word (Engineering) into the search engine (and Google indeed finds it as top hit). Barely any credible info there and no references, so deleting per WP:SCHOOL is the most likely thing to do, but this seems to me to border on the fraudulent.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Si Trew (talk) 13:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Copa90[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Copa90 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Donnie Park (talk) 22:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Luxborough Tower for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luxborough Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxborough Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 22:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Epping Forest district[edit]
Hi Crookesmoor
I notice that on 31 March you moved Epping Forest District to Epping Forest (district).
While I'm not saying that you were wrong to do so (and please don't feel that you were), I have started a discussion on the article's talk page about whether the "district" in the title should be spelled with a small 'd' and be enclosed within parentheses, or if it should be spelled with a capital 'D' and without parentheses enclosing it.
And I feel that it would be in your best interest to participate in this discussion.
Thanks and regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Ross Greer (politician) has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]
Hello, Crookesmoor. Ross Greer (politician), an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know
. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Ross Greer (politician)[edit]
On 17 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ross Greer (politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2016, Ross Greer became the youngest ever Member of the Scottish Parliament, elected at the age of 21? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ross Greer (politician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ross Greer (politician)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
July 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sidcup has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Moving Sidcup to Sudcip is rather immature and also disruptive, Please don't do it again otherwise you'll end up blocked. –Davey2010Talk 15:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Davey2010 has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 19:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Meridian Crew[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Meridian Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Launchballer 12:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Copa90[edit]
The article Copa90 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Absolutely no indication of notability whatsoever. If producing stuff for Instagram made a firm notable, then surely all Instagram users by extension are also notable. Anyone can produce stuff for their own website - I publish music reviews every week - but that doesn't make them notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Launchballer 12:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Meridian Crew[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Meridian Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 18:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Meridian Crew for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meridian Crew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meridian Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nordic Nightfury 14:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Midlands Engine[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Midlands Engine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
NCR1[edit]
Your entry for Strood on line 157 is fine (but reference please); I am reverting Rochester Bridge as the link does not belong in the lead on line 4, as there is no further explanation in the article, the lead is only a synopsis. Please resubmit in the right place and add the referenced info to a lot more articles. ClemRutter (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Edit summaries[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikiproject![edit]
Hello, Crookesmoor! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Crookesmoor, hope you are well. Apologies but I have very restricted computer access at the moment because of domestic renovation work (I've logged on at work to send this!). I think something like National Rail ticket redesign might be suitably generic. (Incidentally if I get time, I can substantially expand the article now that we're two years down the line with the actual rollout (i.e. beyond the limited Parkeon trial on Northern). I'll put it on my to-do list. Not sure when I will get my home PC back up and running, so this may be some way off yet.) Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Bromley Common[edit]
On 3 January 2017 you placed the {{copyvio}} template onto Bromley Common but didn't add any more detail of the source of the copyvio. So I've removed it. Please fell free to refile with sources. -- WOSlinker (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of London Design and Engineering UTC[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on London Design and Engineering UTC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PUNKMINKIS (TALKYTALK) 15:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of television series considered the best for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of television series considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television series considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The Postal Museum[edit]
Why did you rename this article? It's still called The Postal Museum and even the article says so. I don't see that there was any need to change it, so how can you justify it? Please looks at their website. ww2censor (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, can you please add your source to this article? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Please quote your source.Xx236 (talk) 10:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
What was this edit about? I don't understand the relationship between the score and the composer? Can I suggest using edit summaries - if you don't leave them, people can't understand the intent behind your edits and confusion and disagreement (not to mention reverting) may result. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 49s[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 49s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zocke1r (talk) 11:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
It's not a Wikipedia page.Xx236 (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Peter Taylor (British politician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shirt58 (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Merger Proposal[edit]
Merger Proposal[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing—Public Space Protection Order—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPCW (talk • contribs) 12:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
September 2018[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dorset Council (UK), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 17:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm Bri. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jacobs Engineering Group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TCPA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Town and Country Planning Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I've undone your page move because you moved the talk page without moving the relevant article. Feel free to revert me, but I would recommend discussing on the talk page first.
Thanks so much!
programmingGeek(contribs) { this.timestamp = 21:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Charlie Hedges moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Charlie Hedges, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 20:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Chiltern Academy moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Chiltern Academy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~GMCmc {talk to me} 15:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Charlie Hedges concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charlie Hedges, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
The article The Edge, Salford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No apparent notability, I cannot find any secondary sources to confirm notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019[edit]
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, June Mummery, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Chiltern Academy concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chiltern Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Charlie Hedges concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charlie Hedges, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Charlie Hedges[edit]
Hello, Crookesmoor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlie Hedges".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Chiltern Academy[edit]
Hello, Crookesmoor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chiltern Academy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
1917 (film)[edit]
What’s going on? Changing the article name without any discussion!!! Please use the Talk page. Boscaswell talk 21:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martlesham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Suffolk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Denton Island[edit]
I think it would have been far better for you to make a new page for the junction instead of hijacking an existing redirect that had been stable for over ten years. DuncanHill (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hundred of Hoo Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campaign for Better Transport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Gym Group[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Gym Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 22:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio News Hub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulletin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Clore Duffield Foundation[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Clore Duffield Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.drsallybaker.com/uncategorized/notice-re-discussions-about-this-blog/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TRICS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barnet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
[edit]
|
Hello, Crookesmoor!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
|
[edit]
Don't mind you creating it after AFC failure. But don't say it has sufficient info and delete stuff from other articles. It should have included stuff from the uk pandemic page which I note was one of the reasons why it was declined. I have therefore merged the two together in the article which imo is a big improvement. Games of the world (talk) 11:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:UK Planning[edit]
A tag has been placed on Template:UK Planning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheImaCow (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Motorway services[edit]
Why did you move a bunch of pages from "xxx services" to "xxx MSA"? This breaks loads of incoming links, and should not be done without a requested move. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
UK Internal Market Bill[edit]
Hi there,
Yesterday you created a page for the 2019-21 Internal Market Bill.
However, such a page already exists and is far more detailed. Please see UK Internal Market Bill
I suggest you delete the page?
Cheers JLo-Watson (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Strava cycling screenshot.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Strava cycling screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of GCSE Science for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GCSE Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GCSE Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dominicmgm (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Tozinameran vial Canada.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Tozinameran vial Canada.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)