User talk:Cyop

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. In regards to your edit summary here, you must not have looked closely enough, because both "Niche Gamer" and "Dualshockers" are very directly listed as unreliable sources. Additionally, something like "Pastebin" very directly violates WP:USERG.

You've tried to add this info three times now with the same unreliable sources. You need to stop or you'll end up getting your account temporarily blocked for edit warring. If you wish to keep pursuing this, please work through it by discussing on the article's talk page and getting a WP:CONSENSUS to add your content. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 12:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inside-Cap[edit]

Hello, Cyop

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username VickKiang, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Inside-Cap, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inside-Cap is a small Japanese developer now defuncted from the early 2000's that dealt is unlicensed Gameboy Advance software. There isn't many or any what you arbitrarily consider "Reliable sources". And do to shooty internet archiving in the early 200's what every you may have considered "Reliable sources" that were covering inside-cap back then back then may not exist today anymore.

So sorry if I couldn't suddenly materlize these sources in the half hour I spent making the page. I thought I could slowly improve it over time, but I guess the page has to be immediately perfect or else it will get delete.

Thanks, for letting me know where I stand as a contributor to this site. It really put things into perspective Cyop (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies but we actually have a policy for reliable sources, WP:RS, and notability for organisations, WP:NCORP. Could you provide three independent, significant (WP:SIGCOV), reliable sources that demonstrate that this company is notable? in the half hour I spent making the page- this is misleading. You created the page at 16:23, 24 October 2022 but I PRODed at 03:18, 25 October 2022‎, when you haven't improved the article for two hours. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its called exaggeration. Maybe learn it!

Thanks :-) Cyop (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but your exaggeration of the page history is IMHO misleading to others who might view the page. However, instead of your complaints and adding databases and routine listings could it be possible if you could add independent, significant, and reliable sources that demonstrate this is actually notable? VickKiang (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inside-Cap for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inside-Cap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside-Cap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 21:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mystia (Video Game Series)[edit]

I would appreciate if you could provide more refs to demonstrate notability here. WP:GNG requires multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources that constitute as significant coverage. Official sites are not independent (including the two announcements from G-Mode, since the game was distributed by G-Mode), Wikipedia and Twitter are user-generated and also not reliable. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 02:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mystia (Video Game Series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mystia (Video Game Series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystia (Video Game Series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thank you for your improvements, but we can't cite another Wikipedia. You probably know this already but per WP:RSPWP, Wikipedia is not a reliable source because open wikis are self-published sources. This includes articles, non-article pages, The Signpost, non-English Wikipedias, Wikipedia Books, and Wikipedia mirrors; see WP:CIRCULAR for guidance. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 04:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

People are voicing valid concerns, while you're just blindly reverting without explanation. There's few more sure-fire ways to get your account blocked. Last chance to stop. Sergecross73 msg me 14:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 20:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mystia (Video Game Series)[edit]

Hello, Cyop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mystia (Video Game Series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mystia (Video Game Series)[edit]

Hello, Cyop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mystia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]