User talk:Abnormalcy333

Welcome

Hello, DD1997DD, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

DD1997DD, good luck, and have fun. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Macedonian Bloody Wedding.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Macedonian Bloody Wedding.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2929

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partially blocked from Macedonian Blood Wedding

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week from certain areas of the encyclopedia for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 09:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justifying tags

Hi, DD1997DD. Please, try and justify the tags you are adding to some articles on their talk-pages. Nothing is self-evident and I really don't know what you mean with most of them. Why do you think there is an original research in the article when most of it is properly sourced? It does not look like it contains any OR whatsoever. What is biased there, etc. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 04:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pirej.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pirej.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Pirej (novel) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and some of them have been removed. For example you insist that the poem Taga za Yug was dedicated to the hometown of the author Ohrid in North Macedonia, baseed on dubious local source. However the author himself mentions several other towns, then in Ottoman Empire, and today in several countries. Moreover there are cited a lot of secondary academic English sources with absolutely different explanation about author's homeland understanding. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, do not use unreliable sources such as publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources. John Shea is in fact a medical doctor with scarcely any books to his name even in medical matters, not a historian. Dr John Shea of the University of Newcastle, Australia is in fact an expert into psychology. Wolf Oschlies is a German political scientist. Not a historian and his publication is from the times of Communist Yugoslavia and the DDR. Please check the essay Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history). Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, part of the content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. In many historical topics, scholarship is divided, so several scholarly positions should be relied upon. To determine scholarly opinions about a historical topic, use recent scholarly books and chapters on the historiography of the topic. Please avoid old then 30 years sources and fringe view shoolars as John Shea. Nobody use him here. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macedonian language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Veles and Demir Hisar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Macedonian language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --StanProg (talk) 16:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Way forward

I will not comment on that talk page as it has become a hairball, hopefully not something I helped happen. I'm reading your sandbox version. I do have other responsibilities (real life, yes), but if you want I can work with you on the sandbox version, and if we can reach a version I am confident could get through, we can start an RfC. I'm fairly confident Jingiby trusts me to ensure that NPOV issues are handled (in a way that will not devolve into national identity debates) -- but if not he can respond to that ping. This way, even if we fail, we can spare everyone a lot of talk page ugliness, I think. Let me know. Cheers, --Calthinus (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Calthinus:, thank you very much for your offer and all the help thus far! I widely used your comments to add information to the political views section. Please feel free to modify as much as you want and by that I mean add/delete/highlight etc. At the moment, I'm going to focus on the grammar section (although I'll also be somewhat busier next week so idk how far I'll get with it). DD1997DD (talk) 16:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm now done working on the History section. What do you think? --Calthinus (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The one thing I think is still missing in the Standardization section is that, aside from the Bulgarianish issue, the codification of Macedonian was also done according to the ideology that there should be a phonetic alphabet that could express best the synchronic spoken language (unlike Bulgarian or even more so Greek, which have diachronic 'fossils' in the orthography). --Calthinus (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, although the subsections look kind of small to be separate headings in my opinion. And I think you might be able to find something about it in this article here. DD1997DD (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have access :(. I added back the Joseph blurb plus Sussex's view (which is pretty common as I've experienced it among Western linguists -- the view that Bulgarians had opportunity to make a pluralistic language that would encompass Macedonian, but wasted it). Would you prefer I merge the sections back together?--Calthinus (talk) 20:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no, it's much better now that you added that paragraph. Also, maybe try reading it from Sci Hub (Wiki doesn't let me paste the link here here). And just a general tip in life: any scientific article you cannot find online can be found on the Sci-hub website, although Idk if it's legal to use it in all countries of the world lol. I have decided not to focus on the history section anymore and spend time expanding the relevant linguistic features of the language. DD1997DD (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some remark on the talk page, please read them and change the current text in the historical section, as it is contradicting and biased to some extend. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would protest -- on an unrelated note -- this deletion [[1]]. As someone who doesn't speak Macedonian (but with passive knowledge of Russian), I actually found that example very enlightening. And didn't think it was OR. --Calthinus (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really? But 1. the source is very unreliable (misirkov.org) 2. doesn't exist anymore 3. doesn't mention what was written down in the text 4. is not very relevant when there are 5 more examples of Russian words that were replaced a bit further down the text? DD1997DD (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fair enough. --Calthinus (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macedonian Blood Wedding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Language

@DD1997DD:, I'm supposing that you haven't noticed, but I moved the Grammar, Dialects, and Phonology sections to Macedonian language yesterday. The RfC was focused on History and Politics so I didn't move those yet subject to the WP:CONSENSUS that is being established there. I noticed that you made a number of changes to the Sandbox in those sections. You can probably make those edits directly on the Macedonian language page now. As long as we keep the noncontroversial grammar material separate from the History, Politics, and Lead, there should be no objections. --TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TaivoLinguist: Oh, I didn't notice that. Thank you for doing it! There are still several things that can be added to the grammar section (like numbers and adjectives), but I'm not sure if I should do that before the consensus is reached as the article might become long and difficult to navigate. After the consensus, my original plan was to bring it to a good article status. Do you think the sandbox version is anywhere near that stage, despite occasional grammar mistakes/not very professional terminology? DD1997DD (talk) 15:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert on "Good Article" status. It's never interested me, so I have nothing to say about it. Sorry. --TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Language massive changes again

Hi DD1997DD, could you please show me where is the voting for replacing the article content with the one from your sandbox? I see a RFC only on "which version of the article is better". If there's no actual voting, plese, revert your changes. We've already did changes with the other editors, based on discussion and consensus, which you've overriden. Regards! --StanProg (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The voting was to use the sandbox article for the current page. The version from the sandbox is superior to the current one in terms of 1. linguistic content 2. section and lede lenght 3. improved and consistent referencing 4. relevant content. If more editors cast their votes on the talk page and say version 1, then I am willing to change my edits. For now, the majority has agreed that the sandbox version is much better. DD1997DD (talk) 13:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lie. You have explicitly state what the RfC is for: "Therefore, I am inviting you to vote on which version of the article is better". Please, revert you change as there's no actual voting on replacing the content with your sandbox. We're already discussing sections of the article and coming to consensus and changes. Your actions are disrupting the progress. --StanProg (talk) 13:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Honeyland

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Honeyland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transcriptome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diversification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Honeyland

The article Honeyland you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Honeyland for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Third Half, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Before the Rain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justifying tags

Please, instead of putting tags to death, try and justify the tags you are constantly adding to the articles. Nothing is self-evident and I really don't know what you mean with most of them. Why do you think there is original research in the article when most of it is properly sourced? It does not look like it contains any OR whatsoever. There isn't even a section without references. Please, read carefully how to use properly the templates. Jingiby (talk) 16:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honeyland

Hello, Abnormalcy333. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Honeyland at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 22:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DD1997DD: I finished the comments there - not much now! Kingsif (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Honeyland

The article Honeyland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Honeyland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jelena Rozga

added links pointing to Grand Prix and Split

LYPD6B

added a link pointing to NCBI

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jelena Rozga, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bosnian and Istra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jelena Rozga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jelena Rozga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 24 sata.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marina Tucaković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dnevnik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marina Tucaković, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Severina, Bajaga and Bora.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:JelenaRozga-2 by John Pavlish.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JelenaRozga-2 by John Pavlish.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jelena Rozga 2022 by John Pavlish.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jelena Rozga 2022 by John Pavlish.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moderna Žena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cirkus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Abnormalcy333

Thank you for creating Visočka pečenica.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bižuterija Tour

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bižuterija Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bižuterija Tour

The article The Bižuterija Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Bižuterija Tour for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You started to respond to this a couple of weeks ago but have left no comments since; any updates now? --K. Peake 07:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bižuterija Tour

The article The Bižuterija Tour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bižuterija Tour for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suze Biserne moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Suze Biserne, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 00:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Styyx:, thank you for your comment. I will make sure to continue working on it there and hopefully find more sources to expand it further.

Ljubojna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ljubojna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chalgia Sound System moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chalgia Sound System, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia CEE Spring 2022 prize

Dear Abnormalcy333,

Congratulations! You won the fourth prize in the main category of Wikimedia CEE Spring 2022. In order to claim your voucher worth €15, please contact Manfred Werner.

Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:44, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me @Kiril Simeonovski, I will make sure to contact him. Best, Abnormalcy333 (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ljubojna

Hello, Abnormalcy333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ljubojna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chalgia Sound System

Hello, Abnormalcy333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chalgia Sound System, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suze Biserne (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majash2020 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suze Biserne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majash2020 (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abnormalcy333! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Majash2020 (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Suze Biserne

Hello, Abnormalcy333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suze Biserne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minut Srca Mog Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republika.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ProQR logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ProQR logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karolina Gočeva discography moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Karolina Gočeva discography. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Izbirljivo i namjerno moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Izbirljivo i namjerno. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 12:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petar Grašo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanal 5.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pismo-Glava

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pismo-Glava you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IanTEB -- IanTEB (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pismo-Glava

The article Pismo-Glava you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pismo-Glava and Talk:Pismo-Glava/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IanTEB -- IanTEB (talk) 22:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pismo-Glava

The article Pismo-Glava you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pismo-Glava for comments about the article, and Talk:Pismo-Glava/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IanTEB -- IanTEB (talk) 11:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noémi Orvos-Tóth

Hello Abnormalcy333,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Noémi Orvos-Tóth for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Izbirljivo i namjerno

Hello, Abnormalcy333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Izbirljivo i namjerno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]