Jump to content

User talk:DMacks/Archive 38

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40Archive 45

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Bro I was not adding any new links, I was actually removing the spam links, but am not able to understand how wikipedia works!!! Lordshivablessed (talk) 17:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Re "authors="

Hi. I was a little surprised to see your edit here at IPCC[, where you collapsed several co-authors into an explicit "et al." Granted, the practice of citation there is pretty bad, but I think we should avoid making it worse. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

This edit? I merely used the data that was there and added template details around it. If there were to have been fuller author data, I would certainly have retained it and used separate fields as usual. Thanks for finding the additional actual authors and listing them. DMacks (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: June 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 6 | June 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue


Featured Topic Academia and Wikipedia: the first Irish conference on Wikipedia in education
From the Community

Ashesi Wiki Club: Charting the cause for Wikipedia Education Program in West Africa

Wikimedia Serbia has received a new accreditation for the Accredited seminars for teachers

Côte d'Ivoire: Wikipedia Classes 2018 are officially up and running

Basque secondary students have now better coverage for main topics thanks to the Education Program

What lecturers think about their first experience in the Basque Education Program

From the Education Team Education Extension scheduled deprecation
In the News

Wikipedia calls for participation to boost content from the continent

Wikipedia in the History Classroom

Wikipedia as a Pedagogical Tool Complicating Writing in the Technical Writing Classroom

When the World Helps Teach Your Class: Using Wikipedia to Teach Controversial Issues

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, you have deleted all the former teachers because they don't satisfy WP:BIO, but my understanding is that is the criteria for whether someone merits their own article on wikipedia, not whether they deserve a brief mention in the text of another article. I'm concerned that you are setting the bar too high. I'm not particularly attached to the list, which I didn't add, but it is not unlike similar lists on other school pages, and I'd like to agree more appropriate criteria for whether a mention is merited or not. The original section heading did not include "Notable" - you added that.

For example, one of the former pupils removed by someone else, Pamela Schwerdt, does not have her own page in Wikipedia, but merited a full length obituary in the Telegraph. Should that be enough?

Rhanbury (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Let's keep this at Talk:Lady Eleanor Holles School, where I responded. DMacks (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your helpful interventions on this article, and I would very much appreciate your assistance again. Since Spintendo's edit removing all text except the last sentence of each paragraph in the history section, and a bunch of other stuff often without explanation (overall 2/3 of the entire article), including section headers, the article is now random and incoherent, and in a worse state than when I started my major rewrite. We have to bear in mind that ultimately Wikipedia is designed for readers who might find the articles interesting or useful, and I think the current version satisfies the letter of the policies whilst missing the spirit of the intention! As a conflicted editor (The headmistress is my wife, although I have no other connection with the school) I have been threatened with a topic ban if I replace any text that someone else has deleted, so I can't do anything to directly fix it. However YOU could, as a clearly neutral party. I am happy to do any preparatory work in any form and place that you would find convenient, up to and including a complete rebuild of the article in some form of sandbox, using whatever referencing style you think is most likely to stick, but someone else will need to do the actual edit on the article. Can you help? Happy for you to respond here, or my talk page, or the article talk page, as you think appropriate, but I didn't think this request was best placed on the article talk page. Rhanbury (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

  • Rhanbury, essentially what you are doing here is WP:CANVASSING, and that is out of policy. Asking Dmacks to return to the article is (sorta) within bounds, although you should invite all recent editors. However making a case for why he should in his talk page is clearly a policy violation. Please confine your arguments to the article's talk page. I don't object to Dmacks returning, just your methodology. John from Idegon (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
    • What I am trying to do is find an editor (and a method) who will help me ADD high quality content to the article to improve it. I know you are not a fan of excessive verbosity, but it is not possible to create a perfect article merely by deleting existing text, and I can't believe you or anyone would consider the article in its current state to be high quality. Any guidance you can offer on how to do this (as opposed to how NOT to do it), especially as I am now effectively barred from adding anything that has ever been in the article previously, would be most gratefully received! For example, how would I invite all previous editors? A note on everyone's individual talk page?Rhanbury (talk) 07:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Incidentally I had already put an open request for help in the section entitled "Deletion of most of the history section" in the article talk page, but haven't yet received any response there. Rhanbury (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

DMacks

Hello, it's Von de Leorde. I made edits in the Wikipedia once again. Sir, if you think I made a mistake, then you can remove it. After that, I will not make anymore edits in that Wikipedia page. I know you are a very kind and caring person. If you want, you can remove the edits. No problem will occur. See you then, Sir. Bye 😊 Von de leorde (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

23:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep (send to commons)

Hi DMacks. When you !vote "Keep (send to commons)", could you please also perform the transfer? IME low-resolution images regularly get DR'd on Commons, so it'd be good to have someone who's already vouched for these images to keep an eye on them. Best, FASTILY 08:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Professor DMacks

Be my friend...Godfather?

I want to be friends with you, but you need to stop making personal insults against me. Thanks. Brian Everlasting (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I comment solely on your edits. DMacks (talk) 13:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

To DMacks

OMG...Is it so? Am i really adding unsourced edits. I didn't knew about it. Okay if you want to stop adding unsourced edits, i will do it. I am sorry, i will not do this again. Sreeveen (talk) 04:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

16:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

ABC Commercial

Thanks for catching the image and putting it back; no intention of removing that. Nate (chatter) 07:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome! Swiss cheese model of cleanup from disruptive other editors:) DMacks (talk) 07:15, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Sir, regarding the reversion of edits in the article Meena Kumari, I just want to say that a reliable reference is added to each of them. Some of them were present even before a fellow editor removed them. I also mentioned this genuine concern in Meena Kumari's talk page before the above discussed edit was again removed, this time by you. I personally don't see any reason for this reversion. Vrishchik (talk) 05:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the talkpage note. You added it in the middle of a sentence that had a different cite, which does not support it. I re-added it and included the correct cite for it where it is written. DMacks (talk) 13:52, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

09:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acyl group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dimer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: July 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 7 | July 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue


Featured Topic

Wikipedia+Education Conference 2019: Community Engagement Survey


From the Community

Young wikipedian: At WikiClub you get knowledge on your own will

Wikipedia in schools project at the "New Technologies in Education" Conference

Basque Education Program: 2017-2018 school year report


In the News

UNESCO ICT in Education Prize call for nominations opens

An educator's overview of Wikimedia (in short videos format)

19:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Stop Clickbait redirect

I have created redirects for StopClickbait and Stop Clickbait, which point to Clickbait#Backlash; with two articles about them in third party reliable sources, there might not be enough for a standalone article, but there is enough for a short paragraph in the Clickbait article. Samboy (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. Can't remember how I'm involved in this though. DMacks (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Michael Everson

What about the biographical information do you find doubtful? Be specific. -- Evertype· 15:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Possibly every uncited claim about education and personal life, but I have not looked at every specific detail. That's not my job. Claims of education, family status, etc. are commonly used for CV-type articles and other PR purposes, attempting to use Wikipedia to portray a certain image other than what WP:SECONDARY supports (WP:NPOV concern). Even if not an overall PR concern, surely basic facts can be verified somewhere, right? As WP:BLP reminds us, "Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy." and "No original research (NOR) We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources." In that context, it is included in the context of "contentious" material.
As the over-arching WP:V policy states "all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources." (full stop; ideas of doubt or npov are only mentioned as possible subcases). And inline citing (or at least after a sentence with a bunch of details) is probably the best (and maybe only) way to demonstrate that the policy is met. That is, it's an overall {{Citation needed}} situation, not {{Dubious}} on every one of the details. DMacks (talk) 15:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
No. List them. Do you doubt that I was born in Norristown? What "proof" would satisfy you? What else is it that you doubt? Do you doubt that I was interested in Tolkien? That I first went to Ireland because Marija asked me to read a paper there? Because that is why I went. There's a link to the paper. There isn't a link to the conversation Marija and I had. This article, or that particular text certainly, has been there a long time. I'm not posting my diplomas. Or my birth certificate. Or my Irish naturalization certificate. What citations satisfy you? This stuff is nothing that anyone could get without actually asking me. By the way I moved from Portlaoise to Dundee in February 2018, and there's no proof of that. But it's true, and there wasn't any proof that I lived in Portlaoise either.
The Wikipedia does not require a citation for every sentence in every article. The things in the lede there are true. Do you doubt me? -- Evertype· 15:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Educational claims are a common potential type of NPOV fluff in biographical articles. Surely, for example, there is a bio sketch of you on your company website or in some other biographical source that has your educational background? It's well established that you know multiple languages and have studied them extensively. And it's cited all over the second paragraph about later advances in your studies. Conversely, Are the exact details of your favorite childhood book that important? But if they were highlighted in, for example, the Dick Gordon interview, that could resolve the WP:V and UNDUE problems. DMacks (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
My favourite childhood book was Where the Wild Things Are. My career began because of Tolkien, and indeed I have published The Hobbit in five different translations. Yes, it is, in fact, relevant. It's also interesting. I'ts also available on io9, if you want to add that citation. The information you say is unsourced came from a page on "my company's" website (I am my company and the text there was of course written by me) and is already cited in note 4. You're complaining about something that was vetted in like 2006. There's a lot on this page that's well out of date, like the books I've published, and there's no mention of the fame (or infamy) that I have due to my involvement in emoji. There's been a number of interviews and articles out there about that. There's a good few things this article could use to improve it. I don't really see the issue with UNDUE though. (Do you care to edit the article? I can give you links and things. I realize you're acting in good faith.) -- Evertype· 16:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm taking a few days semi-unplugged, will put this on my TODO right after... DMacks (talk) 13:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

17:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

DMacks

Sir, I don't understand what you have written writing in my talk page. Plz define it Von de leorde (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Read. The. Blue. Links. DMacks (talk) 10:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

What is your problem

I cite a legitimate resource and study to improve the content and lesson the bias of the IAFF page and you keep removing it. What is your problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbarron1957 (talkcontribs) 04:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Adding WP:SYNTH and additional counter-point non-neutral content does not lessen bias, it makes the whole article even worse. WP:NPOV does not demand that we retain poor content or balance it 50/50 with other insinuations, but that--as you say--we actually solve the original problem. You can see that I have removed altogether some content that seemed promotional, and slapped a huge warning at the top that the article overall is generally problematic. There is probably copyright violation too. DMacks (talk) 04:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

I appreciate your latest additions and agree that they more accurately portray the page. As we've found out, just because it is from the institutions website doesn't mean it is true or non-promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbarron1957 (talkcontribs) 04:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Ambox warning pn.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International Association of Fire Fighters. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbarron1957 (talkcontribs) 04:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

16:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Santhosh Mathevan

I thought Santosh Mathevan was an RS since he works for The News Today. But did you revert his edits because they border on COI? That I agree is one rule he violated. --Kailash29792 (talk) 15:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

I was going solely with the COI refspam (most of the links were to his own website also). I did not look any further than that. DMacks (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Nice one. Enterprisey (talk!) 20:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi! I see that you are an admin. I want to report a vandal IP who has recently vandalised the page iron oxide cycle and other page(s) from where I have not chased him.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Update: I see he has been blocked.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, was off-line for a few hours. Thanks for tracking it and glad that it is solved. DMacks (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks re: this. Didn't know that! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome (and thanks generally for cleaning up so many film articles!) It's fairly new. I think there's a bot or AWB gradually removing them (and especially fixed number of columns). DMacks (talk) 20:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Boranes

I think that I screwed something up yesterday, cut and pasted when I should have "moved" something. Moving to a pre-owned title requires admin help, which is a nuisance. I just forgot the rules, and the mess that ensues when things are pasted around. If there is some repair work needed, let me know. --Smokefoot (talk) 22:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

@Smokefoot: All fixed. I am one of several chemists-who-are-admins on en and/or commons so if you ever need help just ping. DMacks (talk) 03:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

16:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Boranes

Please be more constructive. Some kind of redirect is needed as the article title is generic. There need to links to the individual compounds which may not be mentioned in the article body. Petergans (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

What you were doing is well outside the guideline and intent of hatnotes, but instead hits multiple ideas of Wikipedia:Hatnote#Examples of improper use. Write some actual content like "Examples include..." (maybe in the section on different structural classes or nomenclature?) or a list of them in the SeeAlso. Or observe that they are all in the "Binary compounds of hydrogen" navbox at the bottom of the article. DMacks (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry to say that this is not a constructive response to a real issue. The article is about a class of compounds, not the individual members of the class. Boranes are a special case because the stoichiometry of members of the class does not follow one rule as do hydrocarbons. That is why there should be a link to the article on each individual member of the class for which an individual page exists, not just a mention in the body of the text. It is further complicated by the fact that if a user searches for "borane" he will be directed to the article borane. Is the general issue something that should be handled by using a disambiguation page? Petergans (talk) 10:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi! Dmacks! It's Roj S..

I looked at your account a lot and liked to be an administrator.

Can you help me to be an Administrator? If yes, I will join you to the ST. But if no, I won't add you to the ST.

ST means Secret Thought. It is just the name it is more useful if you join it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roj2006 (talkcontribs) 17:04, 31 August 2018(UTC)

@Roj2006: see Wikipedia:Becoming an administrator. Sorry, I have no interest in being in your club regardless. DMacks (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: August 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 8 | August 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue
From the Community

The reconnection of Wikimedia Projects in Brazil

Christ (DU) students enrolls for 3rd Wikipedia certificate course

Educational wiki-master-classes at International "Selet" forum

54 students help enrich the digital Arabic content

From the Education Team

Mapping education in the Wikimedia Movement

To DMacks!

I know you are an admin but, could you please unblock my friends account: User:Roj Serbest. HE CAN'T EVEN EDIT HIS TALK PAGE! Will you unblock it? Humanroj (talk) 10:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

WP:VANDALISM is not welcome. I 100% support the block. Tell your friend to go find some other website as a playground. We have serious work to do here. DMacks (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

16:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Culture of Baltimore

I took a look at sourcing some of the culture of Baltimore stuff and decided it was too late in the evening, but boy does it need some work. Thanks for the tweaks. I stopped for some pit beef on Saturday (a Lions Club stand by the road) and realized that it had no article. You're right about the headers - clearly I need to wrap it up for the evening. Acroterion (talk) 03:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

No worries:) DMacks (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marshmallow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

I want to create own ID and edit

Hi!

I want to create my own ID edit wikipedia, contribute in it. Add few photos as well. Kindly respond me here only what will make you allow me to make new ID from this IP only. I assure it would be used by myself. You blocked my previous ID twice due to few of my social media team. Now, we stop sharing our internet to them. my id was @YogeshGosaviFilmmaker now i dont have id. (103.51.153.82 (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC))

Sockpuppet, block evasion. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
We won't be needing your services. It is very clear that you are only here to promote your own corporate projects and abuse other of our account and use policies as well. DMacks (talk) 20:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Pyrimidine dimers

I probably had a drawing in that article that you found wanting. You also might check Spore photoproduct lyase. If you can point to a good source, I will go back and redo these graphics.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

22:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Request for deletion

I just need to request you that please delete two pages - User talk:Ram The Editor and User talk:Misser Boss as the reason of criteria G6. We don't need those pages any more. Thank you. 171.79.30.97 (talk) 17:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)