User talk:Dallasmayor

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Progress Party (Norway). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Prolog (talk) 18:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continued blankings

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Prolog (talk) 18:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are one revert away from losing your editing priviledges. Your continued unexplained blankings of well-referenced content (in favour of The Truth?) could also be considered a form of vandalism. Given your extremely disruptive editing pattern, you certainly will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you do not stop. Prolog (talk) 18:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at Progress Party (Norway). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 21:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Progress Party (Norway). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Progress Party (Norway). You were previously blocked for edit-warring after removing sourced information from this article, and were reverted by a number of editors, yet your first edit after the block expired was to make exactly the same edit again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Black Kite (t) (c) 19:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dallasmayor for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. VQuakr (talk) 07:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]