User talk:Dalmatinska
May 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Đorđe Nemanjić have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
June 2023[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced or remove sourced content, as you did at Valtazar Bogisic, and several other pages, you may be blocked from editing. Also using multiple ip is considered sock puppetry Theonewithreason Theonewithreason (talk) 17:45 26 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Hello, Dalmatinska
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Edward-Woodrow, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Bleiburg genocide, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
--Joy (talk) 17:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Bleiburg genocide[edit]
The article Bleiburg genocide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Recreation- Blatant POV pushing, content fork of Bleiburg repatriations, based on one opinion piece, completely unencyclopedic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 22:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023[edit]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bleiburg genocide. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 22:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Bleiburg genocide. I've applied WP:CSD#A10 twice now on this. The onus is on you to explain what you're trying to do and why it can't be done at Talk:Bleiburg repatriations. -- Joy (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Yugoslav Partisans genocide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is almost entirely unsourced and essentially duplicates the Bleiburg repatriations article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 14:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Bleiburg genocide/Yugoslav Partisans genocide[edit]
You seem to be on some kind of crusade here. What do hope to accomplish? Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Yugoslav Partisans genocide[edit]
Yugoslav Partisans genocide, which has the same content as the twice-deleted Bleiburg genocide, has been tagged for speedy deletion as duplicating and not expanding on, the content of Bleiburg repatriations.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Joy (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Dalmatinska (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
“Yugoslav Partisans genocide” - this page was deleted in a tendentious and malicious manner. AFTER THE END OF THE WORLD WAR II began the massacre / genocide of the unarmed members of the army that surrendered at Bleiburg, their family members and the civilians who were on the run, against all international law of war and all international conventions. The way in which this crime is downplayed on Wikipedia by some authors is pathetic. The number of victims is estimated by many respectable historians and scientist at over 200,000, but no less than 100,000 civilians and prisoners of war. The exact number cannot even be determined when no trials were conducted, no records were kept, but the victims were directly taken to one of the numerous execution grounds, mostly in Slovenia. Therefore, the tendentious behavior of occasional "editors" on Wikipedia about deleting articles, blocking Wikipedia accounts, etc. is POLITICS - and not objective writing and editing of articles. The fact that the Genocide of the Yugoslav Partisans after Bleiburg extradition by the English army wants to be reduced here to downplaying the crime and reducing it to the euphemism of "repatriation", and still the same Belgrade - London axis can be observed according to the this editorial policy. That the data on the specified deleted page is correct is confirmed by Encyclopaedia Britannica on events post World War Two in Yugoslavia: “British commanders refused to accept their surrender and handed them over to the Partisans, who took a merciless revenge. Tens of thousands, including many civilians, were subsequently slaughtered on forced marches and in death camps.” Events of “repatriation” to Yugoslavia ( i.e. forced death marches, massacres and genocide), the European Public Hearing on “Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes" stated: * The victims of these events were estimate to be over 100 000. * Over 580 mass graves. * There were a large number of civilians. * Many of the victims were also women. * There were a large number of regular POW army units. * Concentration camps and labour camps were established in Slovenia and in Croatia (a former Yugoslav republics) under communist rule after the end of the World War Two in Slovenia. On the deleted page it was written: “Nazi Germany capitulated on May 8, 1945. Over 500,000 Croatian civilians and disarmed soldiers of the “Independent State of Croatia ” were on the run to the Austian borders from Yugoslav partisans. The British army hands over captured Croatian civilians and disarmed soldiers in Bleiburg field to Yugoslav partisans. “Every day we executed between 5 and 6 full trains of prisoners of war on the Kočevski Rog”, this was acknowledged by the then 22-year-old partisan Simo Dubajić, who in 2006 published a book about his crimes in Slovenia, committed after the end of the Second World War. He admitted that only his unit executed about 30,000 prisoners of war. And such execution sites in Slovenia were countless. 200,000 Croatian civilians and war prisoners were executed by Yugoslav partisans in the most brutal way in May and June 1945. In this way, after the end of the Second World War, about 5 percent of the population of Croatia was killed. Most of the victims were Croats, although Croats were the most numerous in the partisan anti-fascist movement from the very beginning of World War II. Most of the executors were Serbs. Most of the partisans sent by Tito into executions in Bleiburg were Serbs, who were previously Chetniks (Nazi collaborators). The Yugoslav partisans and their leader Josip Broz Tito never held a criminal response to these crimes. On the contrary, many executors later held significant political functions in Yugoslavia - such as prime minister Milka Planinc. In socialist Yugoslavia, these crimes were a forbidden topic that could not be talked about or written about. Croatian government is mainly represented by the children of partisans and former communists, this is the reason why this genocide against Croats is still taboo. The events of May 1945 in Austria and Slovenia have all the characteristics of genocide. It was the most massive massacre in Europe since the end of World War II to the present day.” Please revoke the authority of Wikipedia editors such as Josip Rodin (alias Joy), Edward Woodrow, Elder Zamza, Peacemaker67, and similar, due to tendentious and malicious editorial policy. Bleiburg genocide or Genocide against Croats in 1945 in Bleiburg (Austria)
Decline reason:
Please see WP:GAB to understand how to craft an unblock request with a possibility of success. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.