User talk:Darin-0

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Darin-0! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- LittleOldMe 10:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

1,500,000th article

Although I may be wrong, I have determined that Hotel Torni, an article you created, is unofficially the 1,500,000th article on Wikipedia. May I congratulate you on this quiet merriment, and for that, you can share part of my jellybeans (see my talk page). I wish you the best of editing this holiday season! --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 23:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I might have to revoke that. Quarma (talk · contribs · count) already has the victor's spoils with Kanab Ambersnail. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 19:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no prob. Thanks anyways. BTW how can it be verified anyway - haven't seen any counter associated with a article page yet. --Darin-0 09:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra High Definition Video

Thanks for tidying up this article. One thing puzzles me. You changed my link to A review of the NAB 2006 demo to a <ref>. I had thought that references were confined to sources consulted when writing the article. If this is true then the <ref> needs to be put back to a link. Martin.leese 21:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry if I did it wrong. I always though that it was preferable to use that format. Some of my articles have been reformated that style so I thought it was the "right" way. --Darin-0 22:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right or wrong, it's now back to how it was. If it turns out to be have been right then I will redo it. Martin.leese 03:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Darin-0! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 710 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Antti Herlin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Electric circuit basic elements

Template:Electric circuit basic elements has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calendar pages

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danish CO2 ?

Hi Darin, this says 182 g CO2/kWh, whereas the table on Electricity sector in Denmark‎ says 410. I can't find the 410 number in the source given, please supply a more direct link. Source page for 182 Quote: "emissionen per kWh el er reduceret fra 440 g/kWh i 2005 til 182 g/kWh i 2014." The difference could be that the 410 is the straight emission, whereas the 182 includes CO2 from the atmosphere to grow wood fuel. TGCP (talk) 13:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just calculated that figure, kg/MWh the same way it was calculated for the previous years from the stated refs - for 2014: http://energinet.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Engelske%20dokumenter/Klimaogmiljo/Environmental%20report%20for%20Danish%20electricity%20and%20CHP%20-%20Summary%20of%20the%20status%20year%202014.pdf. Granted, there is no direct link to this or the previous environmental reports and maybe there should. Darin-0 (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably WP:OR. I tried to find a good source, but it was surprisingly difficult. TGCP (talk) 15:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just calculated (from your source) 12561796 tonnes CO2 / 30615 GWh = 410, same number you got. But central heating also comes from some of the same fuel that emits the CO2, and that changes the calculation - heating also has responsibility for CO2, and is accounted for in the 125%&200% model. Also, import/export is a debatable aspect. It's an example of why original research is banned from Wikipedia. Please fix the issue you introduced here. TGCP (talk) 15:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I canceled my edit if it's wrong - however I only added years 2013 and 2014, the previous years are calculated the same way. I do see what you mean but I do find it interesting to know how much CO2 is being released per produced kWh - regardless of whether the waste heat is utilized or not and in what extent. It's of relevance for example in comparing electric cars to ICE cars. Also I have found Wikipedia to be full of x=A/B "original research" calculations. But anyway, I'm not interested in arguments so I'll leave it the way you recommend :) No hard feelings or anything :) Darin-0 (talk) 10:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CO2 per kWh is an important number for describing a power system, see [1] or [2] for cars. I just added the 182 number in text, but that source cannot be used for the table, as the method seems different (440 in 2005, where table says 571). TGCP (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for List of Tesla superchargers

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Tesla superchargers—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Darin-0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to cite changes you make to articles

I had to roll back the changes you made to the 'Wind Power in the European Union' article in feburary since you did not provide a citation for the changes. info in the checkin comments is not a citation. 74.46.101.158 (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the same amount of time it took You, dear anonymous person, to undo my 30 minutes of update you could have added said reference instead of vandalising legit information.. but anyway, thank you for your attitude. I have been using too much time to update Wikipedia for others to enjoy anyway, now I'm done. Darin-0 (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Darin-0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darin-0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Darin-0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]