User talk:Darknesswolfs

ATTENTION[edit]

Need info about Hqur. If you find any info tell me on this page.

...[edit]

Just in case you didn't know, you have to sign with 4 tildes (~~~~). Just checking, since you never seem to do it.

7h3 3L173 (talk) 05:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the advice! i never knew. im going to tell all my friends too! Darknesswolfs (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hate foxcow[edit]

i feel so bad for you, (and myself because your making me try to straighten this out) is that how you spell straighten? i dont think so. anyway ill tell foxcow in school your mad. your friend Shadowwolfs (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darknesswolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Foxcow made a user called rangerarecool1234, which, (on purpose) sounds like my friends account, rangersarecool. now that i let him make his account on my computor, BAM! im blocked. check the ip address, fooxcow and rangerarecool1234 are the same. if you ask me foxcow should be blocked.

Decline reason:

That is a rather confused request, but we tend not to believe excuses of the "my friend did it" sort. Go play somewhere else, please. — Sandstein 20:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darknesswolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i cant believe you dont believe me! foxcow got rangerarecool1234 out of block by just saying "ill never do it again and can i get a second chance?" oh yeah but when i come along and say that i have two reasons, no you decline. im going to state my old reason, and new reason.

1. foxcow's ip address and rangerarecool1234's ip address are the same.

2. sockpuppets dont go to administrators and say "gues what, im a sockpuppet of rangersarecool" the point of sockpuppets is to cause vandalism without enyone knowing.

i also tried up the hole maya, or mayan thing because i saw in my textbook that it was saying "maya" now look over my reasons and answer.

Decline reason:

So you are sying that you and your friend edit though the same computer using a varity of usernames? That is what we mean by sockpuppetry. We have no way of telling whose fingers are on the keyboard. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 22:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darknesswolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

foxcow has a different ip address than darknesswolfs but foxcow has the same ip address as rangerarecool1234 plus, what kind of sockpuppet would want them to know there a sockpuppet. foxcow told me he told irp he was a sockpuppet of rangersarecool.

Decline reason:

I'm having difficulty understanding this request, however it seems to have very little to do with you. See WP:NOTTHEM. Unless you can come up with a request that directly relates to your actions, your user talk page may be protected from editing. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darknesswolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WHAT DID I DO!!!! Ive tried to make contributations, like mayas and trying to help track down a vandalizer. also i now get that when you say that if rangerarecool1234 is foxcow's than its also mine, but if thats true, why is foxcow not blocked? it makes no sense. if the believe foxcows my sockpuppet, than why isnt he blocked. if you wont unblock me cant you atleast block foxcow? please? also why did shadowwolfs do? he did nothing in its history accept making an article about a boobk that is not published yet. (written by me) what did he do? please block foxcow because i asked him in class to help and he said to give him my usernm amd pwd and i said no. please block him? please?

Decline reason:

And you should be unblocked why? — Smashville^talk 21:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darknesswolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please can i have another chance? i never did enything wrong. i really am sorry about the rangersarecool and all the vandilism. but after i got blocked he never did enything bad again. i never even got one warning. please. sometimes i try to edit church of wall on foxcows talkpage but then i remember i cant. and my friend, well hes going to make an article called god (or church) of wall. id like to contribute to that to. also i made foxywolves to contribute to knights, which i did but id like to contribute more. but i cant cause you blocked it. please. i really am sorry.

Decline reason:

I'm sure you are, but that time is past. You got two more unblock requests than you deserve. And this was the last one; I will make sure of that. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.