User talk:Shadowwolfs

Shadowwolfs (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC) hi[reply]

Reply to this post[edit]

Hi, see WP:Barnstar. -- IRP ☎ 22:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gemquest book1 The Ruins of the Remains[edit]

A tag has been placed on Gemquest book1 The Ruins of the Remains requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page userfied[edit]

I have moved this page into your userspace, where you can edit it to show that it meets the guidelines for inclusion. See User:Shadowwolfs/Gemquest book1 The Ruins of the Remains. The page will not be speedily deleted from that location. -- IRP ☎ 22:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have flagged the userfied page for deletion, as I have no tolerance for sock puppetry. -- IRP ☎ 23:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry or block evasion by Darknesswolfs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sandstein 22:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadowwolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what did i do!!!!!

Decline reason:

Read the template just above this. As a blocked or banned user, you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia during the duration of your block. Please see WP:SOCK for more information. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadowwolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE THAT IM A SOCK OF DARKNESSWOLFS!!!!!

Decline reason:

Well, in the first place, some of your very first edits make it clear that you are that user, or are editing on their behalf. I've just checkusered your account, as well, and you're editing from the same IP address as Darknesswolfs (talk · contribs), Rangersarecool (talk · contribs), and Foxywolves (talk · contribs). – Luna Santin (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadowwolfs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please can i have another chance? i never did enything wrong. i really am sorry about the rangersarecool and all the vandilism. but after i got blocked he never did enything bad again. i never even got one warning. please. sometimes i try to edit church of wall on foxcows talkpage but then i remember i cant. and my friend, well hes going to make an article called god (or church) of wall. id like to contribute to that to. also i made foxywolves to contribute to knights, which i did but id like to contribute more. but i cant cause you blocked it. please. i really am sorry.

Decline reason:

We don't unblock sockpuppet accounts. If you want to be unblocked, you must petition it from your main acccount. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.