User talk:Dartslady180!

December 2019[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bet Lynch; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Im not the only one that's editing the page, there are honest rumours be Dartslady180! (talk) 11:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be grateful if we can come to an agreement of allowing the rumours to be on the Bet lynch page and should corrie officially deny it then we can take it down Dartslady180! (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not happy[edit]

I'm not happy bet lynch's page is back to how it was. I'm not the only one who's edited the page and there are rumours going round that she could be making one more return please leave it to how I edited it until we know for sure

December 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bet Lynch have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is related.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:34, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too rights its related Dartslady180! (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bet Lynch, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reported in the sun and online Bet could return Dartslady180! (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per this, The Sun is not a reliable source and therefore not to be used on Wikipedia. You will need to find another source that complies with Wikipedias policies or your edits will be reverted. Please read the links you've been provided with, they're there to help you. Also, Wikipedia is not interested in rumours so you would need a source stating she IS returning and not that she COULD return. There's a difference. 5 albert square (talk) 02:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you mean for example if there is a source that confirms she is returning then fair does edit it but as long as i send you a link to prove its valid ? Dartslady180! (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine that will be granted, i agree not to add 2020 until there is a confirmed reeport Dartslady180! (talk) 20:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bet Lynch[edit]

Could we come to an agreement over mentioning Bet Lynchs possible return to corrie. It upset me that they were changed back to the way it was when its been reported in the press. Dartslady180! (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]